I had to create a specific OU for WebSense systems for the local WebSense
account - however as I recall it only needed to be present on the actual
WebSense server itself, not on any of the Citrix servers.
I just went the easy route and created a Citrix Servers OU with the
Restricted Groups/User
Don't users need admin rights to install software?
2009/5/28 Linda C Jones linda.jone...@gmail.com
I'd like to make it impossible for users to install Safari and Bonjour.
Has anyone done this?
Linda
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Tod�s the last day!
I get way more work done once I get rid of all those pesky teachers and
students. The second month of summer is the best, because 95% of employees are
off that month. Is nice and quiet, and I can do whatever I need without
worrying about impacting people by
I don't think anyone thinks Ex 2010 sucks; it has a number of exciting new
features. I just think that for some (many?) shops, the SIS issue could have a
significant negative impact.
As I mentioned before, we're a 500-mailbox organization. Moving to Ex 2010
would require 500x the storage
We have had users (more than 1) who are just about to leave - export their
mailbox to PST - and send that PST file to their their personal address -
THIS does bring down Exchange.
The fix There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
From: Owens, Michael
FY1,
Sorry I need immediate help from IT guru's
I have a situation running client on a W3K BOX with crystal client running on
one box and trying to communicate to the crystal server for processing to the
other server. The issue at hand is that the client box is unable to communicate
to the
Yes and removing all elevated rights works great to keep the trash off the
machines, by the way Power User is another elevated you want to kill off.
Jon
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:14 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Don't users need admin rights to install software?
2009/5/28
Did you using TCPview on the Win2k3 Box to see if port 6400 is being
opened to the server.
The java Error in IE could be a lot of things. Have you used Fidder
(Http debugger for IE) to capture the error when you click on userid and
password on the webserver? It could be the wrong version of
Hi,
Deploy Sharepoint, and email links instead. :-)
But as Brian has mentioned - it's working checking your actual SIS stats. I
agree with what he has said - many places get a lot less out of SIS than they
think they are.
Cheers
Ken
From: John
Go to
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/current.aspx
Put IIS 6.0 in the product to search, write down the KB articles listed
for IIS 6.0
There is only 2 post Windows 2003 SP1
MS08-006 (KB942830) and MS06-034(KB917537)
Then against your IIS 6.0 servers run the following
BTW
It's a good begineers book for those that aren't familiar with SQL
2008/2005 ( 2005 is just building off 2k5) I bought it, and already
reviewed it in my 2k8 studies and again it's a good begineers, (get your
feet wet book) wait till Kalen Delaney puts out her set of inside SQL
2008 books,
I miss summers working for a school system. I could modify my schedule and
work 4x10, and have three day weekend, for 10 weeks.
One summer, my principal let me do the following in leiu of vacation, I
worked 4x10+1x8 for 8 weeks, took vacation around 4th of July, so I used 1
vacation day for two
Right, forgot about that one.
My mx is 206.18.123.215 but my outgoing for all port 25 is the 221. Thanks.
Got my requests in on all of these.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Richard Stovall
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: My MX
So what is MS' reason for getting rid of SIS? Perhaps another attempt to
convince people to use Sharepoint?
From: br...@briandesmond.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Amusing
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:50:57 +
Almost.
SIS is per database. So
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Subject: RE: Another free Microsoft Press E-Book
BTW
. ( 2005 is just building off 2k5)
So if 2005 is just building off of 2005, how do they ever improve the
product?
Webster
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
Never mind, Brian. (I gotta start reading the entire thread before replying to
any particular post. And thanks for the explanation.
From: pdw1...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Amusing
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:18:59 -0400
So what is MS' reason for
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:21 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Just make sure it's not RAID 5:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162
His point seems to be that if you have a single disk failure, the
system needs to read all the other disks to reconstruct the failed
Telling them that emailing a link is just as easy as sending the attachment
only goes so far - most L-users are so used to sending attachments form their
personal email activity they just can't break the habit plus not everyone that
they communicate with can access that cute wmv file stored in
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
I presume the database takes pains to store these several tables for
each mailbox together on disk?
[Brian Desmond] Yes. Online maintenance has been entirely rethought to ensure
this.
Well, that's certainly a
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
OK so before we go down the Exchange 2010 sucks because I think I
need single instance [attachment] storage route, let's look at some
other new stuff:
I'm not saying Exchange 2010 doesn't bring anything to the
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Deploy Sharepoint, and email links instead. :-)
SharePoint may well be the most overrated product in the history of
Microsoft. I can tell people to email links to files on the file
server just as easily. The problem
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:29 AM, RITA KAUR mchani...@rogers.com wrote:
I need immediate help from IT guru's
If you need immediate help, call Microsoft Support and pay the $250.
The issue at hand is that the client box is unable to
communicate to the crystal server box and it talks at port
This says so much right here... It's a common trap IT people fall into. We tell
people that the way they want to use the technology isn't the right way to use
it.
Huh? Why not? Technology exists to serve humans--not vice versa.
I agree that e-mail is an efficient means of distributing and
I have to agree. What's the harm in leaving in a feature that is working
perfectly well? We see this all the time, working features removed from
upgraded products. They tried to do the same with PF's and we pushed back,
and hopefully PF's will continue for the forseeable future. I guess it's
Obviously your humour detector is broken (there was a smiley). I have a new
name for Sharepoint 2007 - Sharepain 2007, given the number of hours I have
burnt over the past two months working on a MOSS migration project for a large
customer.
Storage and transmission of large files is still an
Sorry 2k8 is building off 2k5,
--- needs more coffee :-)
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
I agree in general.
But I can understand the opposite view - people write the product first and
release it. It then gets used in ways that are unintended. Now, in Microsoft's
case, there are commerical imperatives that stop them from changing the product
to suit actual usage. But on the other
I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf counter you won't see anything near a
10x reduction.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE:
The harm might be increased CPU or memory usage, reduced scalability etc.
Whilst you can quantify some direct benefits (more disks), I assume that most
people will be swapping 9GB SCSI disks for new 1TB SATA2 disks that probably
consume a bunch less power. Additionally the increased
Mine is at 40. (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never thought to look at this particular perfmon counter before this
post.
Id' be interested to see what others are reporting
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:30 AM
To:
We are in the middle of cutting down our reliance on AppSense and as such
have had to come up with new ways of mapping drives, printers, deploying
shortcuts, etc. We have deployed drive mappings via AD group memberships
using a custom AD attribute assigned to the group. However, for our helpdesk
Mine is about 1.7 for 500 users on EX2007
2009/5/29 David Mazzaccaro david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com
Mine is at 40. (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never thought to look at this particular perfmon counter before this
post.
Id' be interested to see what others are reporting
-Original
Instead of using a custom AD attribute, what about GP Preferences? I
rid myself of a logon script completely by using GPP. WS2k3 Domain, XP
clients
Sean Rector, MCSE
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
I thought that was for AD 2008?
2009/5/29 Sean Rector sean.rec...@vaopera.org
Instead of using a custom AD attribute, what about GP Preferences? I rid
myself of a logon script completely by using GPP. WS2k3 Domain, XP clients
Sean Rector, MCSE
*From:* James Rankin
But in this case, we're not talking about a new product--we're talking about a
new version of an existing product. We already know how people use it; many use
it to store or distribute files.
In our case, we're not talking big files. I have a 10 MB limit. But even
relatively small files, when
9GB SCSI disks? I hope they're still stuck on Exchange 2000 as well...
Swapping out 73GB or 150GB SCSI disks hopefully!
As for memory/CPU, does eliminating SIS mean lower RAM or slower CPU
requirements for the product? Doubtful. The thing they're eliminating is a
bunch of tricky code the
If you have one 2008 DC you have preferences, but I have not played with
them yet.
Jon
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:42 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
I thought that was for AD 2008?
2009/5/29 Sean Rector sean.rec...@vaopera.org
Instead of using a custom AD attribute, what
Shame - I can't find the resource to deploy a 2008 DC just yet, what with
our new housing system going live and VDI approaching rapidly over the
horizon
2009/5/29 Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com
If you have one 2008 DC you have preferences, but I have not played with
them yet.
Jon
On Fri,
+1
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
9GB SCSI disks? I hope they're still stuck on Exchange 2000 as well...
Swapping out 73GB or 150GB SCSI disks hopefully!
As for memory/CPU, does eliminating SIS mean lower RAM or slower CPU
requirements for the
The thing they're eliminating is a
bunch of tricky code the programmers don't like and which needs a lot of
regression testing with each new release.
Do you have any actual information from informed sources on this? Or this just
your backside driving?
Maybe the code is shared with RIS
I agree with several others that said just because you can don't make it
right. I have one user whinning that wants to store EVERYTHING in his
Exchange mailbox. His box is 1 GB at the moment and he has been hinting
that he might like to have more. I only get lucky in that we don't control
our
Sorry to go OT but what VDI appliances are you looking at? Pano or something
else? I'm thinking about purchasing the Pano test kit but am looking for a
couple other options to test as well.
-mb
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 6:47 AM
To:
5.25 for roughly 350 users.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Mazzaccaro
david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com wrote:
Mine is at 40. (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never thought to look at this particular perfmon counter before this
post.
Id' be interested to see what others are reporting
We are going to be using our existing Chip PCs (Windows CE with Excalibur)
with VMWare View to complement our existing ESX 3.5 infrastructure
2009/5/29 Matthew Bullock mbull...@root9.com
Sorry to go OT but what VDI appliances are you looking at? Pano or
something else? I’m thinking about
Not true. You only need a 2008/Vista box to edit policies. XP clients with the
proper CSE will get those settings. Deployable via WSUS.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Custom AD attribute question
14.5 for 200 users.
From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:robbonfig...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
5.25 for roughly 350 users.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Mazzaccaro
Who says what's right, though? That brings us back to trying to force humans
to adapt to technology rather than designing technology for the way users work.
I used to fall more into the camp of believing that users needed to adjust
their ways to fit the technology. But as I've worked on my
At my last employer, they did exactly that. I'm not sure which attribute
it was, possibly division? But it was something they wanted the help
desk people to populate that was not shown in ADUC by default. I don't
have the details but I know it can be done.
Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems
Being an EDU Microsoft about gives us the licensees. Lousy pay and
benefits are made up for with the nice extras that companies like Microsoft
and a couple of other give us to work with.
Jon
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Shame - I can't find the
Of course.
--
ME2
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, paul chinnery pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
So what is MS' reason for getting rid of SIS? Perhaps another attempt to
convince people to use Sharepoint?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Take a look at this if you are still interested in modifying the attribute
through ADUC:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727064.aspx
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
If I'm wrong, I welcome an informed source to say so and reveal the complete
and unfiltered decision process for why a working feature with positive
benefits to many was removed. Not that that would ever happen of course,
because an informed source would be prevented from airing anything with
I meant a staff resource :-) We are a non-profit and get our MS kit for
next to nothing. When I first started here I was recommending getting a copy
of System Center Essentials, and I was handed the full SCOM 2007 product
2009/5/29 Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com
Being an EDU Microsoft about
That's the one I was thinking of, cheers!
I'll probably go for Group Policy Preferences when I get the chance (should
be pretty soon), but as I have already fudged a logon script together to map
drives and printers based on AD group membership, I think I'll have a bash
at completing the circle
Only thing I've seen so far was it killed the sound driver on my home PC
and a coworker's computer.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
Has anyone done the Server 2008 SP 2 yet or am I the guinea pig for it?
Jion
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.comwrote:
Only thing I've seen so far was it killed the sound driver on my home PC
and a coworker's computer.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer -
I do not have a 2k8 DC - I have my own Vista workstation, which gives me access
to the pref's. They propagate to the 2k3 DC's and workstations just fine.
Sean Rector, MCSE
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I'm trying to figure out which server is going to be our GP.
J
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
From: Jon Harris
Go for it Jion!
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone done the Server 2008 SP 2 yet or am I the guinea pig for it?
Jion
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.comwrote:
Only thing I've seen so far was it killed the
Looks like I am the GP for this one. Pulling it down now to my first
server.
Jon
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.comwrote:
I’m trying to figure out which server is going to be our GP.
J
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
+1
--
ME2
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.comwrote:
Only thing I've seen so far was it killed the sound driver on my home PC
and a coworker's computer.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W.
I've done it on about 5 servers so far and 1 DC. Straighforward
install, no issues*yet*
***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(: 814.375.3073
*: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org
***
-Original
An older article referring to Exchange 2000 and older I'm assuming the material
still holds true.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;198673
There is a common misconception that the primary benefit of single instance
storage is that it greatly reduces the storage space
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
As for memory/CPU, does eliminating SIS mean lower RAM or slower CPU
requirements for the product? Doubtful.
Someone already explained that Exchange 2010 moves from a single set
of tables for all mailboxes, to a
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jim Mediger j...@holaday.com wrote:
“Disk space savings from single instance storage are transient and drop off
very quickly over time.”
I believe that is misleading at best. It may even be deliberate
propaganda to justify removing SIS. We've had several
Biggest headache for me was waiting 4 hrs for the thing to download...(yay
Clearwire!).
No issues to report on my Vista x64 machine.
- Sean
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote:
I've done it on about 5 servers so far and 1 DC. Straighforward install,
no
Wouldn't it have been nice that MS had done product research and created a
traditional upgrade keeping SIS, and then released a Datacenter Edition
for large scales of server farms/user bases which didn't have SIS?
I wonder what percentage of revenue is the small to medium business market
compared
I'm downloading/installing now. Download via Comcast took ~10-15 minutes.
This will also be for Vista [Ultimate] x64.
--
ME2
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote:
Biggest headache for me was waiting 4 hrs for the thing to download...(yay
Clearwire!).
SIS Ratio = 65 - 2400 mailboxes
- Sean
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jim Mediger j...@holaday.com wrote:
“Disk space savings from single instance storage are transient and drop
off
very quickly over time.”
I
Just found out that our SQL Admin installed on his 64-bit boxes
yesterday, no issues so far.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
Working on an issue with the developer of the vmxnet3 driver at vmware and I
could use some guidance here.
After an upgrade to vSphere, if I delete the e1000 nic from a 2008 server and
add a vmxnet3 nic, all the servers think they only have Local connectivity?
In the Network and Connection
We're using RSA and have for a while. We just changed our systems to use F5
Passage boxes along with the RSA tokens to establish full VPN tunnels from our
own laptop systems. If you're working off a non corporate system, you can
still connect using VPN, but you won't get a full network tunnel,
I just finished on the host for 6 VM's and it seems a bit more responsive
but no problems. I will start on the VM's next week.
Jon
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.comwrote:
Just found out that our SQL Admin installed on his 64-bit boxes
yesterday, no issues
I haven't used vSphere yet. We're still happily chugging along with
3.5u4.
That said, it sounds like the virtual switches might have become mangled
somehow. Can you ping vm to vm on the same host? On different hosts?
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent:
It's not a Host issue, since when I snap the vm's back pre upgrade they work
fine. It's surely something screwey in the OS.
What would cause a Windows Server 2008 to think it has only Local
connectivity? What *smart* service does this monitoring?
Thanks!
jlc
From: Richard Stovall
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
After an upgrade to vSphere, if I delete the e1000 nic from a 2008 server
and add a vmxnet3 nic, all the servers think they only have “Local”
connectivity?
Do they actually have any connectivity? It sounds
Are these 64bit VMs? At least one other person is having similar
trouble.
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/212090
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 Networking Issue
heh, Ritmo2k is me!
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 11:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 Networking Issue
Are these 64bit VMs? At least one other person is having similar trouble.
Do they actually have any connectivity? It sounds just like what
would happen if the vmnet3 driver was broken and so you didn't
actually have any working network cards anymore.
yeah, its odd? Ie cant browse though, but the thing has network access...
I believe it's the Network List Service
I suppose that's what I get for linking to the first Google hit.
Good luck with it.
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 Networking Issue
heh, Ritmo2k is me!
From: Richard
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
yeah, its odd? Ie cant browse though, but the thing has network access...
Odd indeed. Things to try, that might help narrow down what's broken:
Compare ping by name vs by IP address.
Compare web browsing
Odd indeed. Things to try, that might help narrow down what's broken:
Compare ping by name vs by IP address.
Compare web browsing to a web site by name vs by IP address.
Try tracerouting to the outside world (or proxy server, if you have
one of those), by IP address.
I will do this
2.1, for about 250 mailboxes.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:36, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Mine is about 1.7 for 500 users on EX2007
2009/5/29 David Mazzaccaro david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com
Mine is at 40. (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never thought to look at this particular
Anyone have experience with NuVox as your data and voice provider?
Can you share your comments, please?
Thanks...
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes.
~
We just started using their service. They messed everything up in the
begining giving us the wrong equipment and the tech didnt really seem
sure about what was going on. They sent out another tech with the
correct equipment a few weeks later who pulled everything together and
finished the install
I have two voice PRIs with them. No problems. Good support. (surprising for
a 3rd party LEC)
-
Bob Fronk
P Please print only as needed.
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NuVox - Comments?
Anyone have
Unfortunately we are all on thin clients connecting to a Windows Server 2003
published desktop. Workstations are very thin on the ground here. Guess
we'll just have to wait till the big push towards 2008 AD :-)
2009/5/29 Sean Rector sean.rec...@vaopera.org
I do not have a 2k8 DC – I have my
5.5 for 1600 mailboxes.
***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(: 814.375.3073
*: jckel...@drmc.org
***
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 13:46
To: NT
Thanks.
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NuVox - Comments?
I have two voice PRIs with them. No problems. Good
Thanks.
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
From: Chris Orovet [mailto:coro...@atsi-inc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NuVox - Comments?
We just started using their service. They
I found that on my previously flawless, meticulously clean running home
PC:
1. There are now about 5 UAC confirmations that pop up for AutoRun apps
that I have (Weird, since I have UAC disabled)
2. When the PC comes out of sleep, it takes about a minute for the
keyboard and mouse to 'wake up'.
I've installed it on a few servers herea DC and two Hyper-V hosts. None
of them are being used very much though. So far nothing negative to
report.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone done the Server 2008 SP 2 yet or am I the guinea pig for
Anyone know of any examples how to non interactively script the ms ini such
that I can mount a lun on a target to a specific drive letter, then unmount it?
All the examples I see use iscsicli interactively which won't help me...
Thanks!
jlc
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
We have a need for a semi-mobile satellite setup at a remote construction site.
Basically because of theft, we need to lock up the equipment at night (even
then it might get stolen). So we hope we can find some equipment we can setup
each day for internet access, mainly to access our terminal
Anyone got a dead DL380 they wanna sell?
I have almost all the insides of one that had the physical chassis ruined.
I need to locate a server offsite for some backup purposes so it's not mission
critical.
Thanks!
jlc
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
You could use a portable sat like truckers have for internet access,
BUT ...
You're NOT gonna like RDP over VSAT. VSAT is high latency, minimum 600ms or
more as you have to roundtrip 100,000 miles to see the result of a keypress
( sync satellites are 23,000 to 26,000 miles up in orbit )
I
Does any know what features are available with the trial version of Acronis
Disk Director? I believe we plan on purchasing the product but we have an
immediate need to resize the system partition on 7 newly built servers.
There's too much red tape to go through to get the full product purchased
So ATT just rolled out their 3G network up here in Anchorage, AK last
Tuesday. I definitely see a noticeable difference in battery life. However,
I'm still able to get a full day's use out of my iphone before needing to
charge.
- Sean
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Ken Schaefer
I haven't used Acronis but I've used GParted
(http://gparted.sourceforge.net/) on several Windows system partitions
with no problems.
Thanks,
Brad DeHart
Network Administrator
Kern Health Systems
(661)664-5068
br...@khs-net.com
From: Sean Martin
No highspeed mobile internet access, there might dial-up speeds for mobile
internet, we will be testing ATT and Verizon next week (2 laptops, 1st and 2nd
gen iphones). Tempted to try out peersync, or similar solution, across
satellite, for this situation.
Gene Giannamore
Abide International
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
