Did you open up a call with Microsoft Support accordingly?
Usually issues with patches/SP's are supported for free.
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Guys,
Hope you can shed some light on this for me, here is the scenario;
Domain A: 1 x Domain Controller access by 50 computers (Current CAL
licensing 50 Per Server concurrent connection basis)
New domain B to be added, and trust set up between the two domains.
Domain B: 1 X Domain
IANAL/B/S (lawyer/barrister/soliciter) - and as far as I know, no one else here
is either. I can make some guesses on how I would pursue this, but there is
more information required than you state in your email.
http://microsoft.com/licensing - you'll find telephone numbers for your
locality,
Cheers for that Micheal,
MS said that putting in 10 Device CALS for the computers in Domain B would
be enough. Domain A computers/Users accessing Domain B would not need
additional CAL's as they are accessing SQL Express!
Cheers
Brian
2009/7/9 Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com
A third of my users are doctors. I wonder which group is harder to work with:
engineers or doctors?
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:51:09 -0700
Subject: Re: New IE zero day exploit in the wild
From: kurt.b...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Truth. However, there are also
Subject: RE: New IE zero day exploit in the wild
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:56:01 -0400
From: don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
We're going through something similar right now. Although, not everyone is
a local admin, there are enough of them to cause
Depends on the engineering type. I know Chemical and Nuclear understand
rules and will work inside them with little fuss Metallurgical seem to be
willing if they can't find a loop hole, but they look hard for loop holes to
slip through. Doctors and Chemist ignore rules for the most part until
The best way to do this is to setup your Terminal Server Cals as Enterprise
instead of Domain and make them per user instead of per device.
That way your Terminal Server license server can serve both Domains. If your
TS Cals are not setup this way you have them reissued from
The Microsoft
Doctors: Period, and this is coming from an Engineer. (Yes I have a BSME
from Penn State :-) )
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
From: paul
Installing a new imaging center and the MI Supervisor is asking about fiber
run. We've been running mm, 62.5 throughout the organization.
For those of you with 'fiber' experience, is 62.5 good enough for digital
images or would it be better to go with 50?
I've read that 62.5 is too small
I'm guessing that's EST?
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtualization Webinar July 16
I'm down.
Is there a virtual heckling option for this webinar?
OR EDT?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
I'm guessing that's EST?
--
*From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:48 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE:
Yeah, one of those... :-)
From: Justin Thomas [mailto:jat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualization Webinar July 16
OR EDT?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com
Just released yesterday to YouTube to gauge peoples reaction, kinda weird,
but cute.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PHnRIn74Ag
--
Sherry Abercrombie
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
It is pretty cool. I was one of the early 'beta' folks - not that it's a
normal beta where they pay much attention to feedback.
The only concerns I have is what it's going to cost and if there will ever
be a way to move my phone number to them. I hate to give out the Google
Voice number and later
Currently they are saying it's free. They don't indicate if it will always
be free though:
http://www.google.com/support/voice/bin/answer.py?answer=141993
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Lee Douglas lee.doug...@gmail.com wrote:
It is pretty cool. I was one of the early 'beta' folks - not that
Ok - I just tried that option - and now it wont create the roaming profile at
first log on. Did I do something wrong?
Thanks,
Mike
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
But, there is a monetary Balance section, and a link to add credit
via Google's Checkout service.
--
ME2
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Rob Bonfigliorobbonfig...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently they are saying it's free. They don't indicate if it will always
be free though:
Anyone know when the RC expires? i.e. is it safe to put it out for testing
by a regular user for a few weeks or is it going to expire like the end of
July or something? I don't recall seeing an expiration date on it.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T
But, there is a monetary Balance section, and a link to add credit
via Google's Checkout service.
That's for making international calls. I've been using it since it came out
to talk to my friend in the Peace Corps in South Africa. Pretty good
international rates.
BTW, if you have a Google
July 2010.
Anyone know when the RC expires? i.e. is it safe to put it out for testing by a
regular user for a few weeks or is it going to expire like the end of July or
something? I don't recall seeing an expiration date on it.
~
OK, to get back on the topic, this one has taken a weird twist :
Ran ADPREP /Forestprep ( and /domainprep ) on the Win2000 DC (schema
master) with successful completion messages
but running DCPromo on the Win2003 server against this domain errors out :
The operation failed because:
The RC expires some time in June/May 2010.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Rod Trent rodtr...@myitforum.com wrote:
July 2010.
--
Anyone know when the RC expires? i.e. is it safe to put it out for
testing by a regular user for a few weeks or is it going
So far that's for the cost of International calls, local CONUS calls are
free
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Don't nag screens show up in March, though?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The RC expires some time in June/May 2010.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Rod Trent rodtr...@myitforum.comwrote:
July 2010.
--
Only when I did not give it enough time to replicate but that was years ago
with the 2k server at sub SP2 and the W2k3 at SP0.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, to get back on the topic, this one has taken a weird twist :
Ran ADPREP /Forestprep
I work with one law firm, and they are generally receptive to adapting most
best practices, and sometimes they pay the bill the same day I am there (once I
got a check before they got the invoicehang on let me send you the invoice
for this check���!). It helps to have excellent working
Question:
Is there any software available that will 'show' what is connected on the
network, graphically? Something that looks like Packet Tracer, but self
discovery.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
I can't remember when the Nags start sorry but I may be remembering the
dates they start as the dates the RC is suppose to die.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Don't nag screens show up in March, though?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jon
Kewl.. I might just put it into use for a real workstation then. Thanks
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Windows 7 RC
The RC expires some time in June/May 2010.
Jon
I'd see if an admin account could create a profile. Double check the
permissions on the parent folder, of course. You had been adjusting
permissions before I advised verifying the GPO setting, you might want to
verify the permissions will still allow users to create files and folders...
On Thu,
Ran the ADPrep last nite around 10pm ... gave it an hour and got this error
... so logged out, and tried dcpromo again this morning after a good 8 hours
+ time for replication to finish, and same error. Replication status shows
all success, no errors
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems,
h, thinking maybe to move the schema master, GC and other FSMO roles to
the Exchange/DC and try again ... this one is strange... and I'm definitely
not seeing the problem, that's the problem g
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Jon Harris
Solarwinds had a freeby version of LanSurveyor Express at one time that
would work with Visio 2007.
From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Network Topology Software
Question:
Those kind of problems generally turn out bad for me.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
h, thinking maybe to move the schema master, GC and other FSMO roles
to the Exchange/DC and try again ... this one is strange... and I'm
definitely not
Do you mean to the share? Example, my path is
\\stuctx07\profiles$file://\\stuctx07\profiles$
Profiles$ did not grant write access tot he user... I just changed it. The
strange thing - it was working... I did not change the permissions.
After changing them to allow the users right access... it
Nice find Paul. Downloading it now and they already emailed the serial number
to me. Here is the link to it if anyone else wants it:
http://www.solarwinds.com/register/MoreSoftware.aspx?External=falseProgram=583
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009
This is how you do a bottled water commercial:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiYYDSivdRk
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Evian Ad on YouTube
Just released yesterday to YouTube to gauge peoples
Just takes me to a download page? No option for freeby LSExpress?
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Network Topology Software
Nice find Paul. Downloading it now and they already emailed
I look forward to the chat/comment bar on the side of the
presentation, ala Stephen Colbert's The W0rd segment...
--
ME2
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Andy Shookandy.sh...@peak10.com wrote:
NT list homies,
See below, yours truly is doing stuff….let me know if you have any
questions.
I've deployed a startup script via Group Policy to a couple of machines in a
test OU that successfully sets the killbit for all 45 CLSIDs relevant to this
vulnerability. I'm about ready to link it to our production OUs, but wanted to
ask if anyone has experienced any negative consequences
The only webinar where the QA / heckling lasts longer than the presentation
itself.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualization Webinar July 16
I look
http://www.solarwinds.com/register/registrationform.aspx?Program=583c=7
015000E50d
That's the entry point for it.
You fill in the form and they mail the key / redirect you to the
download page (linked below)
If you go straight to the link below, you just get redirected to the
trial
I pushed the .MSI fix to 300 machines yesterday morning, no death screams yet.
I have one person complaining about some unknown active-x process taking up
CPU, but I haven't even determined if it started yesterday or has been ongoing.
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION
Whoops. My link works for me because I already registered and have the cookie.
Thanks for fixing my error.
From: Hall, Stuart [mailto:sh...@thompson.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Network Topology Software
From what I've seen online in the past- File/Print sharing off (no
server or workstation service) probably most likely culprit. Also seen
it attributed to firewall or other hardening configs.
From- http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/cc184922.aspx MBSA
2.1 Frequently Asked Questions
Doctors are worse for sure. I used to admin at a civil engineering firm. I now
mostly work with doctors, medical staff and a bunch of social workers. Social
workers are the worst of the lot, I swear! ;-)
James
- Original Message -
From: paul chinnery
To: NT System Admin Issues
We ran into something like this with our a/v management console (which
relies on resolution to work properly). Found out ICMP is blocked by
default in W2k8 in those cases and firewall being on in other cases,
that caused the issue.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Paul, the specs for the fiber you use will depend mainly on what
distances you have to cover, what speeds you need to run, and what your
switches or other network devices support. Your switch vendor will have
info about the size, mode (single mode, multimode), distance, etc, and
you can google
(quoting Ken below)
Ken (you dont happen to work at a university do you?)
I did use wireshark, I was using wireshark when it was ethereal, and probably
using it long before most on this list have been working. I HAVE stated the
issue. Windows XP and 2003 clients are experiencing slow
I run into network/firewall folks that love to turn off ICMP but it
wreaks havoc on GPOs. It is a big step forward having NLA in Vista/2008
and removing the requirement on ICMP for GPO processing.
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:27 AM
To: NT
Wow. Way to insult one of the most knowledgeble, and helpful, contributors
to this list.
You keep saying it is DFS, but then you state that connecting to the FQDN or
IP does the same thing. So yes, semantics is important. If you see the
problem via FQDN you are bypassing DFS. So the problem
Just for giggles, what happens if you copy to/from and admin share such
as \\server\c$ file:///\\server\c$ instead of a defined file share?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Does anyone have a decent remote access policy they could share with me?
I'm tasked to create one, in the next couple of weeks, and I'm not sure
of verbage. I'd appreciate any help you guys could offer on this.
Thanks,
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Thanks. Distance is less 200 feet and it'll be plugged into a Cisco 2960. That
switch will then run fiber down to our data center.
Subject: RE: fiber for PACS
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:38:07 -0500
From: k...@colonialsavings.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Paul,
Ok, I have a little chart here that says 62.5 multimode will carry 10Gb
for 35 meters, and 1Gb for 300 meters with an 850nm laser, or 550 meters
with a 1300 nm laser
10Gb for 300 meters would be over 10-Gb fiber at 50/125 (first number is
strand diameter, second is cladding diameter)
I'm getting
Super. Thanks, Kim.
Subject: RE: fiber for PACS
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:44:15 -0500
From: k...@colonialsavings.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Ok, I have a little chart here that says
62.5 multimode will carry 10Gb for 35 meters, and 1Gb for 300 meters with an
Joe,
Replied offline. It's not spectacular, but should point
in the right direction.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
No, I meant NTFS permissions. I noticed in one of your first emails that
you were adjusting ntfs permissions (Security Tab). So, what are the ntfs
permissions on that parent folder? Do you have the Apply to Folders,
subfolders and files enabled?
What happens if you try and create a file
Thanks, Paul.
I knew that someone had mentioned it on this list awhile ago but I couldn't
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:
Solarwinds had a freeby version of LanSurveyor Express at one time that
would work with Visio 2007.
We had a Buffalo Terrastation, which was shared through DFS, performance was
horrible when accessed through DFS, but reasonable when accessed directly.
So...maybe it would be good to know what hardware is serving up the actual
storage?
-Jonathan
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Richard Stovall
Sorry, one is not helpful when the person you are asking help from has o deem
you worthy first. I asked if anyone else has experience this issue. I know
what the root cause is. As I said, there is something going on with the xp and
2003 clients.
It WORKS FINE on vista and windows 7.
What
Wow.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Steph Balog validemai...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, one is not helpful when the person you are asking help from has o
deem you worthy first. I asked if anyone else has experience this issue. I
know what the root cause is. As I said, there is something going
Thanks. I have File/Print sharing on . Now receiving the following
error:
An error occurred while scanning for security updates. (0x80072ee2)
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
I see similar delays with DFS here. Accessing through the server share
directly works fine, going through DFS sees delays up to 4 or 5 seconds.
2008 DCs running on various flavors of IBM x-series servers
The file servers where the shares reside are all IBM blades, dual proc,
4GB of RAM, gigabit
Sorry Steph, all you have described is a small set of symptoms. The
symptoms you describe could have a very large set of possible causes.
Several people have given you suggestions as to things you might want to
look at for a cause and you have done nothing but yell at them. Not a
good way to get
SpiceWorks will do that. It’s free. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Network Topology Software
Question:
Is there any software available that will 'show' what is
What was the last patch you installed on this server?
I went through a similar issue on a Hyper-V guest server I was rebuilding from
scratch, and I was not very far into the build when it happened. I found the
same stuff on google pointing at updates, but no specific solution. So, I
finally
From what I can ascertain so far, Google Voice is the future benchmark
for mobile services integration (call history, voicemail, SMS, etc.)
It is freaking awesome.
Forget Visual Voicemail (VV). What Google has done here is what the
next generation services will be like. And I'm assuming it wont
Since I don't work with doctors in my capacity of IT geek, I don't
know for sure. However, I was married to a critical care nurse for 7
years, and I'll put my money on the doctors.
Heh.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 05:04, paul chinnerypdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
A third of my users are doctors. I
This was not directed at you jon. It was for the other guy sitting there acting
as if Ken was right to sit there marginalizing my issue the way he did.
And the hardware are two dell 2950's. Direct scsi storage. It really is not a
hardware issue at all as I repeat, the vista and windows 7
oooh ok my bad-- I do have the apply to folders and subfolders set.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Server 2008 fail/ My fail?
No, I meant NTFS permissions. I
NetDisco will do this using CDP/LLDP discovery, plus a whole lot more.
But, it requires FreeBSD/Linux to run, and it's more a network
management app than just a network mapper.
I love it though.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 06:40, Daniel Rodriguezdrod...@gmail.com wrote:
Question:
Is there any
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:04 AM, paul chinnerypdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
A third of my users are doctors. I wonder which group is harder to work
with: engineers or doctors?
Doctors. Engineers know they're being arrogant.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
I wasn't suggesting you change those, I was wanting you to verify your
permissions.
You're going to need apply to subfolders otherwise the profile won't be
created correctly. But what permissions are you applying?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Owens, Michael
michael.ow...@dys.ohio.govwrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Mike Semonmse...@ont.com wrote:
The best way to do this is to setup your Terminal Server Cals ...
When did he mention Terminal Server?
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Thanks. I am so forwarding this to our Clincal Analyst; she's a licensed RN
who use to work in CCU.
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:44:54 -0700
Subject: Re: New IE zero day exploit in the wild
From: kurt.b...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Since I don't work with doctors
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Brian
Clarkbrianclark2...@googlemail.com wrote:
MS said that putting in 10 Device CALS for the computers in Domain B would
be enough. Domain A computers/Users accessing Domain B would not need
additional CAL's as they are accessing SQL Express!
I'm a little
They would call it precise.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:04 AM, paul chinnerypdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
A third of my users are doctors. I wonder which group is harder to work
with: engineers or doctors?
Doctors.
You could also, look into using TCPVIEW to look at see if the WU service is
reaching its destination, or a Packet Sniff. But the err.exe tool is killer,
its downloadable at download.microsoft.com just query for the following:
Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up Tool
Z
Edward Ziots
I am beating my TAM and his MGR over the head right now, trying to find
out if the ACTIVE X 0 day is going to be included in next Tuesdays
patches, for his sake he better hope so, or there is going to be some
hate-mail coming his way.
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan
+1 (Agreed)
When you tend to play GOD for a living, which basically Dr's do to a certain
extent ( They have our lives in there capable hands) I guess it can come with
the territory. Not all of them are this way though.
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I,
Hmmm... I have the PCLinusOS Distro installed on my laptop and I am also
running the OSE Virtual Environment with Windows XP Pro... Guess can get the
best of both, perhaps?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
NetDisco will do this using CDP/LLDP discovery, plus
Well, my doctor doesn't have an IT guy on staff (he works in a group
practice) and he doesn't know squat about computers and freely admits it.
:-) I've offered to help him out a time or two, but so far, no nibbles... I
think maybe he's afraid of my fees. ;-)
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:48 AM, paul chinnerypdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
For those of you with 'fiber' experience, is 62.5 good enough for digital
images or would it be better to go with 50?
It depends on the technology. I assume we're talking Ethernet (IEEE
802.3)? If so, it doesn't matter
We are having issues with navigating shares using DFS as well. This is our
situation -- XP clients as we move through the different shares (open
folder, or especially going back and then opening another folder) will just
lock up for 5-30 seconds. A few windows 7 clients we have do not have this
Yeah, well...
In the medical field, right after doctors, I'd put CCU nurses. Heh.
Kurt
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:27, paul chinnerypdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I am so forwarding this to our Clincal Analyst; she's a licensed RN
who use to work in CCU.
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:44:54
Where do your rate Grad School Professors? Below or above Dr's and/or
Lawyers (grin)?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, well...
In the medical field, right after doctors, I'd put CCU nurses. Heh.
Kurt
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:27, paul
No real experience, but you might glean some humor from this:
http://www.phdcomics.com/
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 14:08, Devin Meadedevin.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Where do your rate Grad School Professors? Below or above Dr's and/or
Lawyers (grin)?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Kurt Buff
Thanks to all. I finally got the solution thanks to Bob Free tip about WSUS. I
ended up performing the following on the boxes with this error:
1. validate that your proxy setting is set .
2. Made sure I had current Microsoft Update software.
3. Based on your level of Security you will need to
You do?
Then tell us. Or fix it.
So far you've only shared _symptoms_.
-sc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Steph Balog validemai...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, one is not helpful when the person you are asking help from has o
deem you worthy first. I asked if anyone else has
See also: Alec Baldwin in Malice.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 3:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New IE zero day exploit in the wild
+1 (Agreed)
When you tend to play GOD for a living, which
ok, this one was wierd ... adprep did not process the sch31.ldf file , so it
set the AD at version 30, but 2003r2 requires AD version 31 ...
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009
hmm, makes me wonder if OpenDNS is offering something like this. I think
I'll take a look.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Devin Meade devin.me...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI - If you have Trend Micro Office Scan and are using the web reputation
feature, you are covered:
FYI - If you have Trend Micro Office Scan and are using the web reputation
feature, you are covered:
http://us.trendmicro.com/us/threats/microsoft-mpeg-vulnerability/index.html
Trend Micro products with Web Reputation technology currently block
malicious URLs associated with this exploit.
--
Sorry to pile on late but did you run the ADPREP version from 2003 R2
DISK1?
If so you will get schema version 30, which is just W2K3 without R2.
You want to run the version from DISK 2\ Cmpnents\R2\Adprep that
upgrades the schema directly to version 31 (R2)
From: Erik Goldoff
That is PRECISELY why I recommended he called Microsoft Licensing and document
the call.
As long as Microsoft has given you a documentable answer, you are freed from
penalties. That doesn't mean if they change their mind you don't have to
true up, but you've given a reasonable effort to find
I absolutely hate this thing. I cannot get the Vista driver to work, and the
fact that you have to install a special driver to even see the device is a
little out there. I prefer the NAS Duo actually.
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com]
Sent:
The NV+ NAS has a neat little backup button on the front that will allow you
to plug in a USB drive into the port of the front of the NAS, hit the button and
it copies everything on the NAS to the USB drive.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Are you using a Partner Direct Team or SB partner? You should have access to
the team manager. If your problem is with them, see about contacting their
manager.
From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 4:22 PM
To: NT System Admin
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
