RE: Windows KMS licensing

2009-12-14 Thread Miller Bonnie L .
Huh? Hadn't heard that, but I also didn't watch the vid. We also have VMs that are using KMS licensing and seem to need to activate just like any other install. Maybe they are referring to the fact that depending on your installed server OS, VMs don't necessarily take a license? For

MS Volume Licensing still down?

2009-12-14 Thread Bob Fronk
I still get the The VLSC site is currently down for maintenance. Friday I was able to start a download of some ISOs, but the downloads failed about half way through. BF ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain

2009-12-14 Thread Ziots, Edward
Edward Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + ezi...@lifespan.org Phone:401-639-3505 Can a DFS root (either Domain, or Stand-alone) be done with a Windows 2008 Machine in a Windows 2003 Domain? Does anyone know? Z ~ Finally, powerful

RE: MS Volume Licensing still down?

2009-12-14 Thread Peter Schwarz
Same here. All weekend long L Peter From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:13 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: MS Volume Licensing still down? I still get the The VLSC site is currently down for maintenance. Friday I was able to start

RE: Vipre Competition

2009-12-14 Thread Steve Kelsay
Our problem with eset was there implosion of tech support. After getting status messages of I don't know how to handle that object and no response from their tech support, we determined them to be non-responsive. They did not let a threat though, but really, how could we tell with status messages

RE: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain

2009-12-14 Thread Sean Rector
Works fine - I'm doing it here. Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain Edward Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan

RE: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain

2009-12-14 Thread Ziots, Edward
Is the root of the Win2k8 DFS (Standalone or Directory Integrated DFS) I have a offsite IT person trying to create it on two of there Win2k8 Servers for fault tolerance, they are a Admin on each of there servers, but do not have any higher level rights in our AD tree. They are claiming its asking

RE: Windows KMS licensing

2009-12-14 Thread Tim Evans
The KMS for Vista/WS08 didn't count VM's towards the total count. The one with Win7/WS08R2 does count them. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows KMS licensing Huh? Hadn't heard that,

RE: Windows KMS licensing

2009-12-14 Thread David Lum
Ah HA!! R2 is the magic answer here then, thanks! From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows KMS licensing The KMS for Vista/WS08 didn't count VM's towards the total count. The one with Win7/WS08R2 does

Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread David Lum
One you extend an AD Schema, is there really any way to roll back? Has anyone ever heard of needing to do so? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain

2009-12-14 Thread Sean Rector
Mine is Standalone, and when I created it, I used a Domain Admin account. I'd guess that they need the AD rights. Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: DFS

Re: Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread James Rankin
I'm pretty sure you can't reverse schema changes. You might be able to use forest recovery or some such like to revert back to the previous version though http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3EDA5A79-C99B-4DF9-823C-933FEBA08CFEdisplaylang=en 2009/12/14 David Lum

test

2009-12-14 Thread Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~

RE: Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
You have to do an authoritative forest restore. To put it simply, it's a non-trivial operation. Therefore: test in a lab and isolate the server where you are doing the schema updates until you are certain they succeeded. There are several times I can remember problems with schema updates:

RE: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain

2009-12-14 Thread Ziots, Edward
That might be the issue. When you create the root, even though it's a stand-alone they still need AD rights. Does the root need the account/password afterwards to work, or just during the first creation? I take it there is a DFS service that runs it, but does that service need to run as the domain

RE: test

2009-12-14 Thread Ziots, Edward
U are good Z Edward Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + ezi...@lifespan.org Phone:401-639-3505 From: Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC [mailto:rick.foga...@us.army.mil] Sent: Monday, December

RE: Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread Ziots, Edward
Actually Quest has tools that allow the restore of the forest and Domains, including Schemas (Recovery Manager) but its not cheap, I think they was quoting at least 6 figures for our implementation, but it was also based on the number of users accordingly. Z Edward Ziots Network Engineer

RE: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain

2009-12-14 Thread Sean Rector
I'm 90% sure that it is only needed during creation. Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: DFS root with Win2k8 Machine in Windows 2003 Domain That might be

RE: Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread David Lum
Thanks. My production environment has 2003 (not R2) Domain functional level and has Exchange 2007 in it. If I VM the production DC that should be enough, correct? Actually my setup is ROOT.PVT and I also have SUB.ROOT.PVT, and all my devices and systems are in SUB.ROOT.PVT, I need to VM a

RE: Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
No, the schema is replicated to ALL DCs in a forest. I generally VM the schema master after ensuring that it's also a GC (or I create a new GC and move the schema master role to it). From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Windows KMS licensing

2009-12-14 Thread Miller Bonnie L .
You beat me to it! Yes, ours is R2 as well-thanks Tim. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows KMS licensing Ah HA!! R2 is the magic answer here then, thanks! From: Tim Evans

RE: test

2009-12-14 Thread Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC
Yeah, appears to be getting here now. Hope it doesn't cause issue to anyone else's mail. Not sure how that happened. -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: test U are good

RE: Microsoft Volume Licensing site - broke

2009-12-14 Thread David Lum
Damn them, I was actually able to get there last week, but not today…. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:30 AM To: NT System Admin

Re: Vipre Competition

2009-12-14 Thread Jon Harris
I agree but you asked which vendor would we look at IF Vipre was not available. I did not want to imply that NOD32 was my first choice either. It is simply on my short list. I have had enough issues with McAfee and Symantec in the past where either they cost me time or allowed bugs through to

Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread RM
My boss wants to add some intellegence to our logon scripts with IFMEMBER. I had planned to use Group Policy user logon scripts. Is IFMEMBER still kosher on modern Windows networks? I know it's pretty old technology... Thx, RM ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

RE: Vipre Competition

2009-12-14 Thread Steve Kelsay
I was hoping you would have said, Yes, they had support problems in the past, but are now rated as the best tech support in the industry! Alas. When I switched, they wanted to know why, which was the first contact I had been able to have with them in two tears that was related to any topic

Re: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread James Rankin
Bin your logon scripts, and use Group Policy Preferences. Vastly easier. You can use net user rather than ifmember if you want to use native Windows commands in logon scripts. I'd still go the Group Policy Preferences route though 2009/12/14 RM r...@richardmay.net My boss wants to add some

Re: Vipre Competition

2009-12-14 Thread Jon Harris
As I was not either. At my former place it all came down to money, who was cheaper. The only influence I had was to choose the competition which did not include McAfee or Symantec. Not the best way to do things but then some places don't think like that mine did/does. Jon On Mon, Dec 14, 2009

RE: Vipre Competition

2009-12-14 Thread John Aldrich
Letting bugs through is why I am getting rid of AVG - it would let adware onto a machine and not warn us. At least Vipre is configurable to quarantine it if it gets through, where AVG wouldn't even notify us. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread James Rankin
As I remember, I used to just do a net user *%username% */domain | find *groupname* and checking for the errorlevel. Pretty crude but always seemed to work. Doubtless the list bods will have some more elegant ways of doing it :-) Group Policy client extension is available as an update via WSUS

Re: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread Tom Miller
I use VB script when I can't use GP Prefs, but really focus on the GP Prefs. There is a recent update for XP machines to get them to read prefs properly, as well. RM r...@richardmay.net 12/14/2009 10:44 AM We haven't rolled out the GP Prefs client. It would take a while to get it out

Re: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread James Rankin
Good pointI never made a habit of nesting groups much when I was in my logonscripting-days though 2009/12/14 Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu The problem with Net User is that it doesn’t do recursive searches. IfMember actually searches the token to see which groups SIDs you have so

RE: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread Erik Goldoff
if you're looking for an old school method, don't forget Kixtart Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security _ From: RM [mailto:r...@richardmay.net] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a

Re: Vipre Competition

2009-12-14 Thread Jon Harris
That seems to be a short coming of many of the older style AV products. The newer ones are better at catching newer vectors as well as other malware which is why Vipre and only a couple of products can do. That said there are others in the market but I look at more than just can the software

RE: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread mse...@ont.com
I have used IFMEMBER in the past and it worked fine. It is easy to use, however, going forward like others have said, GPO is the way to go. If you want to use scripting, look at KIX. It is easy to use and powerfull. Mike Original Message: - From: RM r...@richardmay.net Date: Mon,

RE: Is IFMEMBER still OK to use on a modern network?

2009-12-14 Thread mse...@ont.com
Here is the syntax of an IFMEMBER statement that I have used: ifmember Domain\AD Group copy C:\Folder name\File Name \\Server name\File path Original Message: - From: RM r...@richardmay.net Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:28:57 +0100 To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject:

Win 7 Stealing Focus

2009-12-14 Thread Jeremy Anderson
Anyone know how to keep Windows7 from stealing window focus? For example if I am typing in this email box and another window wants my attention it just blinks instead of taking my input from this box? Thanks? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Len Hammond
Just picked up a new (refurbished) Gateway laptop for a non-profit account I service. It came with Windows Vista Home Premium. The NP has some Open license tickets for XP pro and I want to install XP Pro in this device so that it can join the domain. I made all the Vista disks when I got the

RE: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread John Aldrich
You might have to build an install with SATA drivers. I had to do that for a laptop. Or, tell the system to emulate PATA in the BIOS. Often times there's an option for that in the BIOS John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009

Re: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread MarvinC
Download nLite and the SATA drivers. Use nLite to build a bootable ISO containing those drivers. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Len Hammond lenhammo...@gmail.com wrote: Just picked up a new (refurbished) Gateway laptop for a non-profit account I service. It came with Windows Vista Home

Re: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Rene de Haas
Press F6 and load the sata drivers at the start of the setup. Hth Rene On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Len Hammond lenhammo...@gmail.com wrote: Just picked up a new (refurbished) Gateway laptop for a non-profit account I service. It came with Windows Vista Home Premium. The NP has some Open

RE: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Erik Goldoff
I have a 3 year old Toshiba Satellite laptop with SATA drive that runs XP , matter of fact I upgraded the 320gb drive to a 500gb drive and reinstalled XP just fine. Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security _ From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]

Re: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Stephan Barr
XP works fine on SATA it's more likely a BIOS issue as mentioned. You can emulate PATA operation; check it out. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Len Hammond lenhammo...@gmail.com wrote: Just picked up a new (refurbished) Gateway laptop for a non-profit account I service. It came with Windows

RE: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Some bioses can make the SATA controller emulate IDE. Check to see if the bios has a Compatibility Mode for the SATA controller. Else, you can use the F6 method or the nLite method already mentioned to get the drivers installed on the system. Good luck! --Matt Ross Ephrata School District

RE: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Kennedy, Jim
+1 We have to do that here reasonably often. From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:34 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: newer laptop and Windows xp XP works fine on SATA it's more likely a BIOS issue as mentioned. You can emulate

RE: Microsoft Volume Licensing site - broke

2009-12-14 Thread Bob Fronk
Now the site says …… Media fulfillment isn’t available while the site is undergoing maintenance, however, we are offering to ship media at no cost to our customers as necessary. If you prefer not to wait for VLSC availability, please contact your local Volume Licensing Call Center by

RE: Microsoft Volume Licensing site - broke

2009-12-14 Thread David Lum
I get something quite similar: The Microsoft Volume Licensing Service Center is undergoing maintenance as part of a series of enhancements to improve the licensing management experience for partners and customers. We apologize for any inconvenience and our goal is for the site to be available

RE: Microsoft Volume Licensing site - broke

2009-12-14 Thread Maglinger, Paul
They must have installed Internet Explorer 8 on the servers. J From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 3:11 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Volume Licensing site - broke I get something quite similar: The Microsoft Volume

RE: Extend Schema

2009-12-14 Thread Brian Desmond
Hi- You can however defunct nearly every schema change which basically hides the attributes and classes and allows them to be reused. They're still physically in the database but otherwise inaccessible. Is there a scenario where this is not sufficient? Thanks, Brian Desmond

Re: newer laptop and Windows xp

2009-12-14 Thread Len Hammond
It's new enough to have the IDE emulation setting. Loading XP now. That was too easy! I expect this build to last less than a year, as I hope to take this church to Win7 sometime late next summer. We have to raise some funding for new licensing - shouldn't be too bad with Microsoft's Charity

Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Kurt Buff
All, I'm contemplating getting much more familiar with Xen for my own education, especially now that it's supposed to be able to replicate VMs in realtime for failover. I'm thinking of having someone put together at least one, and perhaps two boxes with a single quad-core CPU and 8 or 16 gbytes

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Rack mountable or not? --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:38:46 -0800 Subject: Hardware question... All, I'm

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Kurt Buff
Not - I'll be putting these in the corner of my office at home. Kurt On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 15:56, Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote: Rack mountable or not? --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] To:

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Matthew W. Ross
I would buy a couple of these... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101272 ...and ad my own processor/memory/supported RAID card. But i'm cheap like that. Want something smaller/quieter? --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff

RE: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Erik Goldoff
I built my own from i7 quad core CPU, gigabyte mobo, ( only ) 6gb RAM , board will hold up to 24gb, and some SATA drives in this Antec case :

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Kurt Buff
I'd rather pay someone to do it - been a while since I've touched hardware. Nice case, though. I'll keep that in mind. Kurt On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 16:13, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote: I built my own from i7 quad core CPU, gigabyte mobo, ( only ) 6gb RAM , board will hold up to 24gb,

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Kurt Buff
Don't need RAID - just a single drive. But that looks like a definite possbility. I can add RAM and a hard drive. I've munged a couple of procs, though, and would rather someone else do that. Kurt On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 16:07, Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote: I would buy a

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread John Cook
Or go to slickdeals.net, pick out the best deal on a Dell T100 and add memory (max 8 gb), probably around $400 delivered and it comes with a warranty. - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Re: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Matthew W. Ross
The beautiful thing about the SuperMicro is that it's all setup for work without CPU, Ram or Hard drives... everything else is all set. The reason I recommended a raid card was because the internal intel raid isn't likely to be supported by Xen. Compared to a similar Dell or HP, the Supermicro

RE: Hardware question...

2009-12-14 Thread Erik Goldoff
Damn near foolproof building a box nowadays, and you can control the costs ... Right now I can get SATA drives around $90 per TB at Fry's so it makes for a good inexpensive desktop server. (I'd rather have a rack and rackmount servers from HP, but this will do nicely for now ) Erik Goldoff