Hi list,
I am in the need of a simple ftp/ftps server for windows. Key criteria is that
the server software
- writes the log into a flat file
- stores the user database in a flat file
We need to be able to easily copy the whole configuration to another host;
therefore any database-driven
Anyone running this and run into an issue? We have found that W2K3
Standard does not support NUMA, and the new HS22 blades have NUMA enabled
by default, which has been causing us some memory issues. Just wanted to
see if anyone else on the list has run into this yet.
Thanks,
Chris
Filzilla should meet all of that. If I recall the user transfer is a tiny bit
more involved...you have to run a little script that comes with it to transfer
users.
http://wiki.filezilla-project.org/Main_Page
-Original Message-
From: Buchenauer Christian [mailto:cbuchena...@gmail.com]
Have you checked out FileZilla ... they have a good FTP server in addition
to just their FTP client ...
http://filezilla-project.org/
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Buchenauer Christian
cbuchena...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi list,
I am in the need of a simple ftp/ftps server for windows. Key
thanks guys, after years of pondering this problem, a solution
arises. Although it doesnt mean much in my present position.
All I need now is a stripped down light weight DC and this mental
problem will be solved.
At 06:10 PM 1/4/2010, you wrote:
Yes - Subnets, Sites, Site link, Drag/drop in
What about ADAM?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: andy afo...@psu.edu
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:43
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: simple gp issue
thanks guys, after years of pondering this problem, a
Is he still locked up in the shed at Texas Tech! (ouch!)
Webster
From: asbz...@gmail.com [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: simple gp issue
What about ADAM?
_
From: andy afo...@psu.edu
Subject: RE: simple gp issue
thanks guys, after years of pondering this
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7873
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Not yet, but I'll say that if all the cobol programs made it thru Y2K
without major issue only to have all the PC stuff crash a decade later,
I'd have to chuckle.
-sc
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Yep. Just got this about Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
Symantec Endpoint Protection Management Server considers any
definition updates dated after December 31, 2009 to be out-of-date.
Any definitions dated in 2010 are being thrown away without being sent
to client computers.
I wonder wether they'll provide a patch also for standalone unmanaged clients
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Inviato: martedì 5 gennaio 2010 16.04
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
Yep. Just got this about Symantec
Anyone?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10423985-56.html
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Ditto. Works like a charm here.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Looking for a simple FTP / FTPs - server
Have you checked out FileZilla ... they have a good FTP server
Well I just tried it and it works.
sc
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Win7 God mode?
Anyone?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10423985-56.html
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST
Worked great here on x64 Win7
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Win7 God mode?
Well I just tried it and it works.
sc
From: David Lum
http://brandonlive.com/2010/01/04/the-so-called-god-mode/
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Win7 God mode?
Worked great here on x64 Win7
From: Steven M. Caesare
+1
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Worked great here on x64 Win7
--
*From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:51 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Win7 God
+1 on 64 bit. Thanks for the info Dave.
Also, I just made one on a server share, then hit a couple of Win 7 machines
with \\servername\sharefile:///\\servername\share then clicked the GodMode
folder I created in the share and it hooks to the local machine.
From: Sam Cayze
Sure! Note the other article Mark sent a link to indicates it's the ID that is
specific, I changed mine from GodMode to DaveMode, lol
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Win7 God mode?
+1 on 64
So much for the intrigue. :)
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership*
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Weber, Mark A mark-a-we...@uiowa.eduwrote:
http://brandonlive.com/2010/01/04/the-so-called-god-mode/
Indeed. :)
Especially since organizations are quite a bit thinner in the IT staffing
area this year than a decade ago.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership*
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Steven M. Caesare
I was just going to say that as a a test I created
Test.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C} and it worked the same.
However, creating a folder with just the ID does nothing but create a
standard folder.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Sure! Note the
My guess would expand a bit on Andrew's to say how much of the code from
Cobol has been ported over to PC's and is still in use? From reading the
article it would appear that some of it has made it through with out the
needed re-writes.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Andrew S. Baker
After reading lots of posts, they say that the problem is only in the SEPM
code. Standalone clients aren't affected. Standalone clients will still get
the 12/31/2009 dated defs as it can cause problems if a client, like my laptop,
gets it defs directly from Symantec, unless it is at work,
Vipre had no issues with the date change..
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu wrote:
After reading lots of posts, “they say” that the problem is only in the
SEPM code. Standalone clients aren’t affected. Standalone clients will
still get the 12/31/2009
Leaked?
Jon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Amazing.
I wonder how someone figured that out.
*From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:43 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Win7 God mode?
+1 on my 64-bit as well.
--
ME2
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote:
+1 on 64 bit. Thanks for the info Dave.
Also, I just made one on a server share, then hit a couple of Win 7
machines with \\servername\share then clicked the GodMode folder I
Oh... It's another link to the story concerning Symantec's products. My
first reaction was that I'd not been out of the house except to work this
year. Then again, there's only been one weekend...
HEY, we've had OT threads here before!
David Lum david@nwea.org wrote on 01/05/2010
WOW. Symantec FTL, again...
--
ME2
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu wrote:
Yep. Just got this about Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
Symantec Endpoint Protection Management Server considers any definition
updates dated after December 31, 2009 to be
Previously reported here - http://www.winvistaclub.com/g31.html (sometime in
2008)
and here - http://smallvoid.com/article/winnt-all-tasks-folder.html (1 Nov 2008)
and here
- http://www.winmatrix.com/forums/index.php?/topic/16029-registry-hack-all-control-panel-setting-tasks-at-one-place/
Agreed but most likely it was either leaked or someone into detail read
something. The second article seems to indicate it is a documented feature
that may get killed at some point.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
That’s just boring.
I’d
I stand corrected, thank you.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Eh…much of this is caused by lack of strong typing.
Binary coded decimal and hexadecimal both have the exact same bit pattern -
binary ‘0001’ - to represent different
I understand that the Chinese found it when they were reverse
engineering Windows so they can insert backdoor rootkits in the kernel
so when they flood the market with cheap pirated copies on ebay their
plan for world domination in the upcoming year will be that much easier.
They'll just fire
LOL, good one SC.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
I understand that the Chinese found it when they were reverse engineering
Windows so they can insert backdoor rootkits in the kernel so when they
flood the market with cheap pirated copies on ebay
But this is an issue also for unmanaged clients and according to Symantec
support a patch will be released in the next days
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Inviato: martedì 5 gennaio 2010 17.18
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: 2010 date problems
Should be the same reason why if you order 1,2,3...10 ten will be ordered
before 2.
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Inviato: martedì 5 gennaio 2010 17.18
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
After reading lots of posts,
That would be ROR.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win7 God mode?
LOL, good one SC.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.commailto:scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
I
Kerio is having an issue with 2010 and it's mail server
running SpamAssassin, some details:
Emails Dated 2010 are being marked as SPAM
Kerio wish to make you aware of a bug that may have been affecting
your email since 1st January 2010.
SpamAssassin 3.2.5 used in Kerio MailServer's Spam
Here's another one
http://bit.ly/8vflew
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Joe User joeu...@chronic.org wrote:
Kerio is having an issue with 2010 and it's mail server
running SpamAssassin, some details:
Emails Dated 2010 are being marked as SPAM
Kerio wish to make you aware of a bug
Vista Business 32 Bit SP2 w/ latest patches.
It works as local admin off the C drive. Also tested as non admin under the
users Documents and it works but the applets are still blocked.
Devin
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Anyone?
*grabbing some popcorn*
2010 could be a lot more interesting than 2000 turned out to be.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
Okay, this is getting to be kind of funny. Y2K wasn't and now Y2K+10 is
having all sorts of problems popping up.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Lee Douglas lee.doug...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's another one
http://bit.ly/8vflew
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Joe User joeu...@chronic.org
I have an old Dell 4400 that I would like to donate to charity, I need to
wipe all the drives, I tried DBAN, it gave me non-fatal error and did not do
anything, I assume it cant deal with the SCSI drives.
Anyone have any suggestions?
--
Stefan Jafs
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that
DBAN should work fine with SCSI drives, but you may need to use a
non-RAID SCSI card.
Stefan Jafs wrote:
I have an old Dell 4400 that I would like to donate to charity, I need
to wipe all the drives, I tried DBAN, it gave me non-fatal error and did
not do anything, I assume it cant deal with
Yes, but this is because of the oft-overlooked fact that lots and lots of
effort went into making Y2K a non-event. It's not that nothing was going to
happen, but rather than much of what could have happened was mitigated. (Yes,
some price gouging also took place, but companies bring that on
It depends on the controller. I'm currently wiping several drives on a perc2
controller. I had to boot with the noverify option to get it to come up. There
are other boot options you can play with too that might help.
...Tim
From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Read Only DC? (Need 2008 for that)
-Mike
From: bounce-8783038-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8783038-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Webster
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: simple gp issue
Is he still
That did the trick, noverify it's wiping now,
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Tim Evans tev...@sparling.com wrote:
It depends on the controller. I’m currently wiping several drives on a
perc2 controller. I had to boot with the noverify option to get it to come
up. There are other
killdisk. http://www.killdisk.com/
free version works well - just boot from CDRom and sit back and wait the 10
hours it takes.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Stefan Jafs stefan.j...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an old Dell 4400 that I would like to donate to charity, I need to
wipe all the
Wouldn't that be ROR?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 08:59, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL, good one SC.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com
wrote:
I understand that the Chinese found it when they were reverse engineering
Windows so they can
Dang - beat me to it...
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 09:24, Bob Fronk b...@btrfronk.com wrote:
That would be ROR.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win7 God mode?
LOL, good one SC.
On Tue,
That's because we don't code in COBOL.
Alex
Running and ducking at the same time
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 date problems anyone?
Vipre had no issues with the date change..
On
Welll, how interesting. This list has just made me look like a
brilliant admin. once again. Thanks to the person that posted about the
issue with SpamAssassin, we use SA and upon investigation have observed
behavior stated in the link provided. Thankfully, we discovered it before
our users
Humm.
Guess I read that differently than you. Only problem I saw mentioned with
unmanaged clients is the display of the defs date as 12/31/2009 but they are in
fact updating and will show the correct defs date when Symantec fixes the SEPM
issue and starts releasing defs with current dates.
The spamassassin issue was resolved within 24 hours, if you had a
current version of spamassassin installed and saupdate turned on...
I saw a few messages with this score, but none of them made it to a
spam folder - they were otherwise not scored high enough to push them
over the edge.
I think
Ok, I'm testing an IE 8 deployment, and it seems it enables that
annoying IE8 Language bar that our company have no need for. It's
annoying, and being a anal freak - makes my skin crawl.
How can I disable this globally so that my sanity is restored?
Thanks,
Sam Cayze
Information
DBAN can deal with SCSI drives, do you have the latest version 2.0X?
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
From: Bryan Garmon
I have used GlobalScape here, without many issues.
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Windows Storage Server 2003. I've had this happen on 5 or so disks, some brand
new. Tried different USB Docks/Enclosures. No matter what, the disk falls
offline at some point. It's a backup device, so it get hammered with writes.
Could I have a bad USB controller? Or could it be at the OS
Yeah, but someone (not me), did not setup saupdate..
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
The spamassassin issue was resolved within 24 hours, if you had a
current version of spamassassin installed and saupdate turned on...
I saw a few messages with this
Hello Sherry,
Tuesday, January 5, 2010, 1:41:32 PM, you wrote:
Welll, how interesting. This list has just made me look like a
brilliant admin. once again. Thanks to the person that posted about the
issue with SpamAssassin, we use SA and upon investigation have observed
behavior stated
Ahh
We'll that's not a mistake I'd expect you to make, anyway.
Make sure you clue that person into the Sought rules, and also make
sure that he/she is aware that 3.3 is coming out RSN...
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 13:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, but someone (not
Thanks Kurtwe are looking at making some changes. These *nix servers at
the colo were setup by someone else a couple of years ago, we inherited the
management of them last year. Finding things like this is good. Like I
said, we found it corrected it BEFORE users noticed they weren't
What a maroon...
Kurt
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 13:37, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Kurtwe are looking at making some changes. These *nix servers at
the colo were setup by someone else a couple of years ago, we inherited the
management of them last year. Finding
I think this has been asked in the past, but I don't remember the
answer. Can a Windows Server 2008 Std SP2 be a DC in a Windows 2003
Domain? Would I need to run a domain prep for the 2008 server?
Todd Lemmiksoo
Network Administrator
All-Mode Communications, Inc.
1725 Dryden Road
Freeville, New
You need to run adprep forestprep and adprep domainprep. But it'll still be a
2003 domain until you update the other DCs and bump the FFL or DFL.
From: Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@all-mode.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server 2k8 in 2k3
Sounds like it. Or bad cabling if it’s common to all of the physical paths.
-sc
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Thousands of Event 51 Logged
Windows Storage Server 2003. I've had this happen
Tried all new cables. 20GB of writes so far and no errors.
We'll see!
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Thousands of Event 51 Logged
Sounds like it. Or bad
So.. both my home Win2K8sp1 DC's decided to stop resolving DNS twice in
the last several days. The service was running, it just stopped
resolving names. A restart of the service did the trick.
Being the typical cobbler without shoes, I hadn't patched these boxes in
a while. Attampting to
What's in the WindowsUpdate.log file?
Do a wuauclt /detectnow and then past the entries for the attempted update from
the log file.
Cheers
Ken
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 January 2010 11:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows Update
Something similar recently happened to me on my home SBS2008 server. I removed
WSUS and reinstalled. Don't know if that is the proper way to fix, but it
worked for me.
Also, I had an issue because I disabled IPV6 on the NIC. I re-enabled it which
fixed the issue. However, I can't recall
Thanks Ken... looking at the .log reveals an old WSUS server I
decommissioned from this domain long ago... it must still be lurking in
a GP somewhere.
I'll run that down first before bothering the list any further.
Thanks for the pointer.
-sc
From: Ken Schaefer
I have had somewhat similar problems in the past with Windows Update
that were apparently caused by using OpenDNS for my external
resolvers, and thereby receiving sub-optimal responses for Windows
Update-related sites. update.microsoft.com is a small maze of
distributed sites, and for a while
Well, Ken got me down the correct path, methinks.
I had an old GPO still linked to the DC's OU that had a (long since
decommissioned) WSUS server set up in it. I've removed those links.
However, it appears that the actual GPO object itself is not anywhere in
my SYSVOL. As a matter of fact, it
No fun. Is this one of those situations where you have to create a
GPO to unset some settings that some other settings set? (Sorry, my
son has been playing with tongue twisters lately.)
Regarding the home domain question, I guess I was thinking in the
context of someone who doesn't run one. I
Just died again :(
-OP
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Thousands of Event 51 Logged
Tried all new cables. 20GB of writes so far and no errors.
We'll see!
Ya I think so. I killed the lnks to the offending GPO object, but now the DC's
still have the settings lingering on them, and I don't see the WSUS stuff in
the local policy MMC snap in. So I figured I'd edit the old WSUS policy GPO to
turn all the settings back to off,... and that's when I
Time to pop a PCI US card in there?
-sc
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Thousands of Event 51 Logged
Just died again :(
-OP
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent:
I agree, except I might use a USB card.
:-)
But seriously, since this is a Storage Server 2003 box, is it under
warranty anymore? Can you do something like this and be supported by
the manufacturer? If it's out of warranty, I'd have the screwdriver
out already...
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:18
Hmmph.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Thousands of Event 51 Logged
I agree, except I might use a USB card.
:-)
But seriously, since this is a Storage
You should be able to remove the offending entries from the registry
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]
[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate\AU]
-Original Message-
From: Steven
Oh, and you will probably need to restart the automatic updates service
afterwards
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows Update failure
You should be able to
I have a client that needs to secure their site for PCI compliance, and I have
one scan result I can't figure out how to fix: Synopsis : The DEBUG method is
enabled on the remote host. Description : It is possible to send debug
statements to the remote ASP scripts. An attacker might use this to
Are there multiple sites on the IIS server? If so, have you checked
all of them? Just a thought...
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:46 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have a client that needs to secure their site for PCI compliance, and I
have one scan result I can't figure out how to
There are two sites- one web/external facing and a SharePoint site. I did a
HDD-wide search for web.config and machine.config files and of the four
found, only one had DEBUG= in it.
Dave
From: Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January
85 matches
Mail list logo
