Sure you can do it.
You still have to do the schema update at the forest root first though.
Actually, wherever the schema master is, since schema updates go out to all DCs
in the forest.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum
I was searching for it last night, still digging folks...
And yes from a Malware standpoint it is read only and I even have the
SHA-1, SHA-256 and MD5 hashes of the files accordingly on that darn
thing So you can check it yourself with fsum.exe. Now if I could
just find the darn thing
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
Remember from a malware security standpoint that a finalized CD-ROM is READ
ONLY and not a vector for malware infections to spread ...
A USB flash drive with a mechanical read-only switch is also nice for that.
-- Ben
~
This might help:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754209%28WS.10%29.aspx
To use all the Windows Server 2008 or Windows Server 2008 R2 domain-level
features without upgrading your entire Windows Server 2003 forest to
Windows Server 2008 or Windows Server 2008 R2, raise only the
What account is the scheduled task using?
Does the job work fine if you manually run it using the same credentials as
the scheduled task?
If not, what error is received?
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Steve Kelsay kels...@sctax.org wrote:
The thing is, it
HI All,
We are having sporadic problems with mostly XP clients connecting to a Samba
share (RHEL5.4, with samba-3.0.33-3.14.el5.)
Basically, automated builders connect to the samba share (on a VOB server), the
samba share connects to the AD password server to authenticate.
On the Samba server
Agreed,
Just more costly and not as convenient *all* the time as making copies on CD
ROM. I normally carry both with me, but the CD-ROM is guaranteed read only
and a must for those sites where you need PROOF you didn't cause an
infection, but with the switch on the USB drive, well, you know
Can I have multiple domains pointed to the same IP?
Mx1.imcu.org xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1
Mail.imcu.com xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1
Mail.indianamembersinsurance.com xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
Yes and I printed your email, just to tick you off
Shook
From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DNS question
Can I have multiple domains pointed to the same IP?
Mx1.imcu.org xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1
Mail.imcu.com
Yup.
It's standard practice if you are using host-headers on your web server
to serve multiple domains.
-sc
From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DNS question
Can I have multiple domains pointed to
As long as you considered the environment first, that's fine.
On 3 June 2010 22:32, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote:
Yes and I printed your email, just to tick you off….
Shook
*From:* David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:31 AM
*To:* NT
It is using a Microsoft account. Runs fine when run manually, when run
from Task scheduler, it gets an error the target path cannot be found.
It is the correct path, I can browse it using the same account. It is
like the 2008 task scheduler does not like to connect to the novell box,
but the
Just says to consider.
:-)
_
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS question
Yes and I printed your email, just to tick you off..
Shook
From: David McSpadden
Ok.
Going forward with a migration away from hosted email to hosting it my self
on Exchange and I have 4 domains' to bring in through my firewall and
Ironport.
Just wanted to be sure before I finish this write to the board.
Thanks
_
From: Steven M. Caesare
Yes and don't see any reason it wouldn't be recommended.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 12:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 2008 DC question
2003 forest with 1 subdomain. Can
Sure, some web servers use host headers to handle multiple domains from a
single IP web host
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308163
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308163 for one example on IIS
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process,
*** It is the correct path, I can browse it using the same account.*
I take this to mean that you have logged on to the console with the same
account as the Microsoft account in question and then you're running
whatever the scheduler is running?
***when run from Task scheduler, it gets an error
Can you lay down auditing on the target directory for the account you
are using in the script and audit for read/write access for that
account, this will tell you if the script is even attempting to
read/write to the directory accordingly. Should pair down where you
might be having issues.
I never tried auditing on a Novell box, I do use it all the time on MS
though. We are moving our entire data center across town, so I have been
running a bit ragged for a few weeks! Thanks. I should have thought of
that.
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, June
Can you tell us what the script/task you are attempting to run is
supposed to do?
Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org 6/3/2010 9:57 AM
Can you lay down auditing on the target directory for the account you
are using in the script and audit for read/write access for that
account, this will tell
Rock on, thanks everyone!
Dave
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 6:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2008 DC question
Yes and don't see any reason it wouldn't be recommended.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c -
It runs an executable which moves files from certain folder trees on a Novell
FTP server to a Microsoft server to be processed by our tax system.
Essentially, it just moves files from a public server to a private one and
renames them according to some weird process incorporating account names
It just seems strange to me that it does not like UNC conventions, nor a
drive mapped according to the same user, but if that drive is mapped
inside the bat file, it does recognize the letter. There is a hotfix
about usernames in the task scheduler, so perhaps there is another issue
involving them
I'm having a problem with a program that wants to print to LPT2 on our Vista
machine. The Vista machine is a replacement for an XP machine that just wore
out. The XP machine used to have LPT2 mapped to LPT1 on another XP machine
and I tried re-doing the mapping in Vista, and it *says* it's
You can use UNCs on Netware servers just fine, but you need to configure
the server to do so. It's not out of the box like Windows. Remember
with Netware servers you map server / volume / full path unless you
configure the system to do otherwise. The server will need to have
Universal Password
Ok. I got it working, but why is Vista such a PITA to print on a different
port locally than the physical port on the computer the remote printer is
connected to?
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:13 AM
To: NT
And the solution was?
Just in case someone else comes across the same issue.
From: John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: 03/06/2010 15:21
Subject:RESOLVED: Vista printing problem
Ok? I got it
You might want to cname all those actually as then if the IP changes you only
update it once...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 8:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS
I found another batchfile on an XP machine. Simple, 2-line batch file:
Net use /del LPT2
Net use LPT2 \\computername\printershare
file:///\\computername\printershare
And you *don't* have to create the actual printer in Windows. For some
strange reason, Vista modifies the settings on the
OK then can you see if it takes the information from the FTP server ( FTP logs)
(Step 1), then audit the Microsoft Server to see if its put there with the
auditing. Also you can use tcpview to take a look if the executable when run
makes a connection to the FTP accordingly.
Z
Edward
We started having a problem yesterday that's continuing today, and I'm not sure
how to track down the cause.
The issue is that we're getting sporadic-but fairly regular-DNS lookup timeouts
that are killing our Internet connectivity. Here's a sample nslookup:
www.nbc.comhttp://www.nbc.com
Hi Folks,
This happens occasionally and I'm looking for a method to avoid this. We run
Terminal Server 2008 here, and occasionally after a patch is applied a user
will call stating he can no longer get to the TS farm via the Web interface.
Some users have IE 6, some IE 7, some IE 8. For
Are you on the MFN (Florida DMS) network? We just brought up a site two days
ago with some similar issues - internal is fine but going out to the internet
is sketchy.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741
Yes, in fact!
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spotty DNS forwarding killing us
Are you on the MFN (Florida DMS) network? We just brought up a site two days
ago with some similar issues - internal is fine
You need the phone #?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: John Hornbuckle
I'll write you off-list...
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spotty DNS forwarding killing us
You need the phone #?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Ah, that explains it, there must be a hanging chad stuck in the system
somewhere.
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spotty DNS forwarding killing us
Yes, in fact!
From: John
That's how we roll down here.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spotty DNS forwarding killing us
Ah, that explains it, there must be a hanging chad stuck in the system
somewhere.
From: John
I can always count on this list for at least a laugh a day...
John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us 6/3/2010 8:49 AM
That's how we roll down here.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
And just when Al and Tipper Gore announced they are separating
CFee
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spotty DNS forwarding killing us
Ah, that explains it, there must be a hanging chad stuck in
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Fergal O'Connell
foconn...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
Basically, automated builders connect to the samba share (on a VOB server) ...
What's a VOB server?
the samba share connects to the AD password server to authenticate.
How is authentication configured on
No, I think I led you astray. The executable does not use FTP. It picks up
files that have been ftp from the external world to a Novell server, then moves
the files using windows to a Microsoft server. That is the point that is
failing, it cannot see the Novell folders in order to do the file
In fact that is what I do with my sites. 1 A Record for the actual server,
several CNAMEs pointing to the A Record for each site. Much easier if you
have to move hosts.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.comwrote:
*You might want to cname all those actually as
We're still missing some key info, methinks.
Is the scheduled job a single executable that does all of this wonderful
magic?
Where is the error message occurring, and how are you able to determine if
it is the source location or destination that is having the problem?
If you are able to get
The executable is a single executable. It writes its' own log file.
Nothing is showing in the system logs. The log says the source folder
does not exist, then lists the correct source folder. Yes, it does
indicate it is not a user account issue, but that is the point. The user
account is not
***The log says the source folder does not exist, then lists the correct
source folder.*
Which we are to understand is using a UNC path, correct?
*** but that is the point. The user account is not function inside the
task under server 2008 as it did in server 2000. *
To say that there are
Try to logon as the account for the scheduled task, and make a persistent
connection to the Novell resource.
At a glance, I couldn't find any errors on Google that would suggest a
specific Win2008 vs Novell issue.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Steve Kelsay
Would I be correct in telling my fellow SE's that Server Core typical uses are
remote DC (along with RODC), hyper-V hosts and web servers?
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
I KNEW I'd answer my own question right after hitting SEND:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd184076.aspx
Dave
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server Core
Would I be correct in telling my fellow
Server core is good for anything that doesn't need a gui on top.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server Core
Would I be
Uh,
So what needs a GUI on top?
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:22, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Server core is good for anything that doesn’t need a gui on top.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum
Which is all the incentive you need to send as soon as you think of a
question, right?
:)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:21, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I KNEW I’d answer my own question right after hitting SEND:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd184076.aspx
Dave
From:
Exchange for example. Most AV engines. Blah blah blah.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
That's what a lot of former Novell admins used to say, including myself.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 1:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Server Core
Uh,
So what needs a GUI on top?
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at
Exchange? Huh. I would have thought that could be managed remotely. Interesting.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:32, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Exchange for example. Most AV engines. Blah blah blah.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
Haven't touched Novell since 3.12 - back in the '90s.
FreeBSD is the non-GUI platform I implement now.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:34, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
That's what a lot of former Novell admins used to say, including myself.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt
FreeBSD is the non-GUI platform I implement now.
Ahh Kurt,
There's hope for you yet:)
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:47, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
FreeBSD is the non-GUI platform I implement now.
Ahh Kurt,
There's hope for you yet:)
Heh.
I doubt it. I have a 9-month old boy...
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Are you kidding? That's *why* there's hope for you.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:47, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
FreeBSD is the non-GUI platform I implement now.
Ahh Kurt,
There's hope for you yet:)
I do that all the time. The act of phrasing a question for the list
generally reorders my mind enough to try a different search pattern. I must
have 20 drafts of questions that I start typing out and never finish because
the lighbulb goes off before I've clicked send.
You do have to send a lot
Perhaps you missed one of the original posts. The user is logging into
the machine and has a persistent drive mapping. It works fine. The
executable being run by the task works just fine when run from the
command line. When run from the task scheduler, even when the user is
logged in, it fails.
Yeah. I did that with my question earlier today about printing in Vista. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Server Core - answered my own Q
I do that all the time.
It can be managed remotely. I don't know exactly what the dependency on GUI is
(never thought to ask, actually), but it won't install on server core.
Interesting question to ask though...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original
You can map a drive in one of 3 ways:
- NETBIOS name
- FQDN
- IP address
These methods can be done to the same resource simultaneously with different
credentials.
If you have the batch file use one of the latter two options for mapping the
drive, there won't be any conflict with the
Only from a personal point of view - professionally speaking, I now
have less time learn and spend on overtime than I had before, and I'm
tied to a more constrained schedule at work.
I don't mind that a bit - Wouldn't give up my time with the boy for
the ten times the pay, but it crimps the work
Certainly not a burning issue, but if you ever get an answer on that,
it would be interesting to hear the response.
Kurt
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:16, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
It can be managed remotely. I don't know exactly what the dependency on GUI
is (never thought to
I would assume to troubleshoot if there are local issues with connectivity.
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.299.2541
Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain
confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of
Remember the purpose of core was not to be an application platform but to
“provide a minimal environment for running specific server roles that reduces
the maintenance and management requirements and the attack surface for those
server roles.”
Hellos all.
I am researching to see if there are any IT groups / organizations that anyone
knows about. What I mean is like an association where IT professional or IT
companies attend meetings, education, some sort of accreditations?
Thanks to all.
Sincerely,
Cesare' A. Ramos
I would assume to troubleshoot if there are local issues with connectivity.
You can still log on manually to a phys console and execute powershell...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Agreed, unless you're PS challenged like myself...:)
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.299.2541
Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain
confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended
recipient.
Interesting, and good to know. Still, the more they can support on
core, the better, IMHO.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:48, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Remember the purpose of core was not to be an application platform but to
“provide a minimal environment for running specific server roles that
They sure push Server Core hard in the 70-640 test.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Server Core
Interesting, and good to know. Still, the more they can support on
core, the
Remember the purpose of core was not to be an application platform but to
“provide a minimal environment for running specific server roles that reduces
the maintenance and management requirements and the attack surface for those
server roles.”
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:56, Cesare' A. Ramos cra...@idfllc.com wrote:
Hellos all.
I am researching to see if there are any IT groups / organizations that
anyone knows about. What I mean is like an association where IT
professional or IT companies attend meetings, education, some sort of
Test? You mean certification?
Certs are for the weak. I overcame that need in 1995.
Kurt
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57, Chris Blair chris_bl...@identisys.com wrote:
They sure push Server Core hard in the 70-640 test.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Ditto to what Kurt said. The other question is, in what part of the world are
you located?
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
I put ALL DCs on Server Core given the opportunity.
It also supports lots of other roles so...
Personally if I worked in an environment where I had admins who were all
sufficiently skilled I'd put every box I could on Server Core, but, I recognize
reality. Very few places I've been where this
You can run GUIs on Server Core in some cases...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server Core
Server core is good for anything that
BTW, CNAMEs pointing to MX records is a no-no. It may or may not work; but
isn't RFC compliant (unless this has changed recently?)
Jeff
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact that is what I do with my sites. 1 A Record for the actual server,
several
We are not communicating. The Batch file is mapping the drive fine. The
task is not able to run without the ,mapping taking place inside the
task. The question is, why do we need to map the drive inside the batch
file? The server has a drive already mapped, and under server 2000, the
executable
Yes, cert.
I had the same attitude, but I am actually enjoying it and learning a lot.
Each to their own.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Server Core
Test? You mean
And I'm saying that this is not a new problem under Windows Server 2008.
There was very likely something done on your 2000 server
to accommodate this, because this is the way that Windows normally operates
with mapped drives and scheduled tasks.
The recommendation for years has been to use UNC
Yeah, that's from the 2008 not the 2008 R2 docs...
Server 2008 R2 now supports powershell, ASP.NET, some fraction of .NET that
isn't required for WPF, etc. etc. Those were the initial _technical_ reasons.
:-)
Marketing is just that - marketing. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and
Yes, GUI's that have no dependencies other than on the OS itself. Relatively
few and far between. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 4:03 PM
To: NT System
Local User Groups?
What area are you in?
From: Cesare' A. Ramos [mailto:cra...@idfllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: IT Groups / Organizations
Hellos all.
I am researching to see if there are any IT groups / organizations that
anyone
Heh.
If only I had the time...
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 13:07, Chris Blair chris_bl...@identisys.com wrote:
Yes, cert.
I had the same attitude, but I am actually enjoying it and learning a lot.
Each to their own.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
The recommendation for years has been to use UNC paths in scheduled
tasks.
OK, how do you get the unc path to work? That is the crux of what I have
been asking. It worked fine in 200, does not work in 2008. Nothing else
has changed except the task scheduler. I would love to do what you are
Cesare,
I admit to being a bit biased here, but the short answer is GITCA
(www.gitca.orghttp://www.gitca.org) which stands for the Global IT Community
Association. GITCA is an organization made up of User Groups around the globe
as well as other user group communities. GITCA has a User Group
Good catch.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jeff Bunting bunting.j...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, CNAMEs pointing to MX records is a no-no. It may or may not work; but
isn't RFC compliant (unless this has changed recently?)
Jeff
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com
Can you provide the batch file you use as the work around?
If the UNC path works for mapping the drive, it should work elsewhere.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Steve Kelsay kels...@sctax.org wrote:
The recommendation for years has been to use UNC paths
OT (bit of topic), anyone delt with recovery ITunes Store bought Music, and
restored to a brand new install???
I am going to reformat and reinstall the OS a customer who got malware.
They asked me to backup thier itunes library, bought tons of music from
itunes store.
Is it simple Backing of
Google something like move itunes library to another computer. Tons of
info out there.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
I think there's an app for that.
Shook
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT (bit of topic), anyone delt with recovery ITunes Store bought
Music,(backedup to external drive) and restored to a brand new
Really?
_
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT (bit of topic), anyone delt with recovery ITunes Store
bought Music,(backedup to external drive) and restored to a brand new
install???
I
I've done this before for myself. I took the entire iTunes directory (which
also includes several other .itl and .itdb files).
Just image the drive first and you can always recover if it doesn't go well.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM, justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.comwrote:
OT (bit of
If anyone tells you it (the time sink thing) gets better they're lying.
My daughter consumes more of my time now than when she was your son's age.
Wouldn't change a thing, though. Luckily I do the day-care dropoff and she
has the pickup, so I can work late when necessary...
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010
MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS
In order for organizations to be considered for membership they should:
A.Consist of at least 10 registered members who physically or virtually
gather for the mutual benefit of sharing information, generally about
Information Technology.
This group 'virtually'
I was going to create a acronis image backup
I want to make sure it not going to infect the computer, so I may do a
malware scan on it.
So if all the files are in the same location as before, itunes should see as
if nothing changed, just maybe authorize it.
If thier an app for that, what the
Very true Dave, and there are members of this list who head groups or
organizations who are members of GITCA (I won't call them out or anything).
Members of this list are exactly the types of people that we would love to get
involved with User Groups in their local areas - that is people who
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
