A little bit OT I'm sure, but perhaps someone can tell me of their experiences.
The Technet Pro subscription comes with 12 E-learning courses but the technet
page doesn't tell me any more about the courses themselves. Anyone know what
kind of courses they are ? Are they just the weird MS
With a TechNet Pro subscription, you receive six months of access to
Microsoft E-Learning with hands-on learning to help you build the skills you
need to do your job. The following courses are available to TechNet Pro
subscribers through June 30, 2010:
. Course 3377: Implementing Windows
The ones I took about a year ago were self-paced web based courses.
Jeff
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Oliver Marshall
oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote:
A little bit OT I'm sure, but perhaps someone can tell me of their
experiences.
The Technet Pro subscription comes with 12
If you buy CPU licenses of Data Center Server you can run as many as you
want.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualisation structural question
If you purchase the
Yes but Enterprise is a bit less expensive than Data Center.
Jon
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:03 AM, N Parr npar...@mortonind.com wrote:
If you buy CPU licenses of Data Center Server you can run as many as you
want.
--
*From:* Jon Harris
Yes, but it depends on the size of the box.
If you're building or purchasing a box that can only support 5 or 6 VMs,
then DataCenter is overkill.
If you're building a box that can support 15-20+ VMs, then you'll save
tremendously by going with DataCenter because that will be the only OS
license
Within our current licensing agreement, we get a boat load of these
web-based courses.
I'd say that the content is much better than what you would get at their
free expos, but not quite what you would get attending a cert class.
Still worth the time IMHO though.
Don Guyer
Systems
http://www.qualys.com/products/qg_suite/malware_detection/ provides a
free site scanning service as well.
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
I came across this little nugget in another discussion group, figure I would
Perhaps this will help:
http://www.qualys.com/products/qg_suite/malware_detection/
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
about 111,000 sites infected
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=8935
~ Finally, powerful
Bumping this ... works for our developers fine, and it's free.
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.299.2541
Email: jay.d...@3-gig.commailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain
confidential and/or privileged information for the
There is a free version of KillDisk as far as I can remember, but I'd
probably stick with DBAN.
Regards
Tony Patton
Desktop Operations Cavan
Ext 8078
Direct Dial 049 435 2878
email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com
From: Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) joe.haral...@ge.com
To: NT
Ok here my scenario:
I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7. We are using
one IP address for both sites using host headers. On our internal AD
DNS we have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP
address (A records). For our first site we have a one-to-one
I've been using dban too ... anything particular that dissatisfies you about
DBAN or you just seeking input ?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
joe.haral...@ge.com wrote:
Does anyone have a good Disk cleaning free tool? I currently use DBAN but
was
Why the interest in leaving DBAN? It is what I've used for years
Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) joe.haral...@ge.com 6/15/2010 8:06
AM
Does anyone have a good Disk cleaning free tool? I currently use DBAN
but was exploring other options.
Joe Haralson
Network Infrastructure Team
~
Seeking input. I just want to make sure I'm not missing out on better
tool.
Joe Haralson
Network Infrastructure Team
GE - Rail Services
160 N. Clark
Chicago, Il 60601
Office: (312) 853-5014
( DC: : *8 750-5014
( Cell: : (312)590-0048
* e-Mail: joe.haral...@ge.com
THIS E-MAIL IS
I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a one
to one with the second public server and the internal website.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
Ok here my scenario:
I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with
That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically and
let the host header take care of it.
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question
I *think* you would
Hi Jim,
So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and
2 entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing
to the same public ip and then the headers will function fine?
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent:
Not looking to leave DBAN. Looking at options. I also have a need for a
tool that can be used remotely. I would like to clean Data drive and not
have to boot from cd.
Joe Haralson
Network Infrastructure Team
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent:
Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.
From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question
Hi Jim,
So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port
Nice. I will give that a shot.
Thanks..
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question
Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.
+1
use same IPs for public like you do internal, let host header mechanism sort
it out at the IIS server level.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org
wrote:
Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.
*From:* Chyka, Robert
I suppose you could use something like eraser at the file system level, but
it would take much longer for an entire drive ( I use that for folders/files
though )
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
joe.haral...@ge.com wrote:
Not looking to leave DBAN. Looking
There are a whole slew of security reasons why you'll not find one
that you can run remotely, or not boot from the CD.
we use the native Disk Utility in OS X, just pull the HD and plug it
in using a USB to IDE/SATA connector.
but hey, If you do find one that you can run remotely please let us
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
joe.haral...@ge.com wrote:
Does anyone have a good Disk cleaning free tool? I currently use DBAN but
was exploring other options.
DISKPART has a CLEAN ALL command which writes zeros to every block
on the disk. The chief
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:56 AM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a whole slew of security reasons why you'll not find one
that you can run remotely, or not boot from the CD.
You can certainly do raw disk overwrites remotely on Unix/Linux
(including the Unixy part of Mac OS X).
And why is a solution like this missing from MS operating systems??
Well, because vendors with their own commercial interests (ie. spend as
little as possible and agree on nothing with competitors) don't play
well. If there were an open platform for plugging into a
patch-updating type API, and
rant
Perhaps if those who re-wrote the regulations saying that overwrite is no
longer sufficient were to receive a couple hundred thousand old hard
drives (especially all at once), they might re-consider that regulation.
/rant
--
Richard D. McClary
Systems Administrator, Information Technology
I think you meant /dev/zero, not /zev/zero :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DISK WIPING TOOL
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:56 AM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote:
There are
Speaking of Secunia...webinar on now...
http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/webinars/
-Original Message-
From: Alan Davies [mailto:adav...@cls-services.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch Management - again
And why
It isn't.
The WSUS engine is more than capable of distributing and automatically
installing third-party updates - it's what's used in products like
System Center Essentials for the task - and MS created System Center
Updates Publisher (aka SCUP) so that admins can add the updates.
Third parties
If the speed of the CD boot is getting to you, transfer it to a USB flash
memory device, and boot from that. I do that for UBCD4Win, whic has DBAN on
it.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:56 AM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a whole slew of security reasons why you'll not find one
that
+1 on SSL needs
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
The only caveat I can think of is if you ever need to do SSL on more than
one of the sites. You'll need different IPs in this case since the host
header is encrypted. You can solve the translation
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
I think you meant /dev/zero, not /zev/zero :-)
Uhhh... my Linux box has a French accent. ;-)
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Thanks to everyone for there response.
Joe Haralson
Network Infrastructure Team
GE - Rail Services
160 N. Clark
Chicago, Il 60601
Office: (312) 853-5014
( DC: : *8 750-5014
( Cell: : (312)590-0048
* e-Mail: joe.haral...@ge.com
THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:08 PM, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
Perhaps if those who re-wrote the regulations saying that overwrite is no
longer sufficient were to receive a couple hundred thousand old hard drives
(especially all at once), they might re-consider that regulation.
... Is
Tu es un drôle de gars.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DISK WIPING TOOL
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
I think you meant
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:18 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
And if you’re a non profit Datacenter is a no brainer. A single
cpu of DC edition for us is under (don’t hate me…) $400!
[blank stare]
[splutter]
[goes cross-eyed]
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that
DoG regs, I would think.
(Sorry)
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:08 PM, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
Perhaps if those who re-wrote the regulations saying that overwrite is no
longer sufficient were to receive a couple
And if all else fails, use a BFH.
J
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
From: Richard
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
And why is a solution like this missing from MS operating systems??
It isn't.
Comparing MSI/WSUS to RPM/YUM (or dpkg/APT or...) is really missing
a lot. MSI is a beast to develop for, it's a compatibility nightmare
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
+1 for Johnny Dangerously
Do you know your last name is an adverb?
+1 for Shavlik
Yah, I haven't used Shavlik NetChk much, but what I did try was
impressive. I tried the free NetChk Limited package, and it found an
issue
I upgraded to VSphere quit a while ago but just today applied all Critical
and Non-critical patches. I notices that old VM's still show v4 after
updating the VMware tools, I even tried to remove re--boot and re-install
still v 4. However all new VM's show v 7! Should they not all just be v 7
after
What you're seeing is the VM hardware version. You need to be running
VMware Tools from ESX 4.x before you upgrade them to v7.
Here's how:
Shutdown the VM.
Right click and choose Upgrade Hardware
Turn on VM
Let Windows detect assorted new hardware
Reboot.
Rejoice.
You can actually have
On 14 Jun 2010 at 13:39, John Aldrich wrote:
According to CIT´s Technical Support person, IE is the only supported
browser. L I may still have the user try FireFox or Chrome, or even IE
within FireFox. J
ChromePlus has a built-in IETab feature. http://chromeplus.org/
--
Angus
On 14 Jun 2010 at 11:12, Bill Songstad wrote:
My webmaster has asked for the ability to run multiple versions of IE (6, 7,
and 8) on a Windows XP workstation. I found a couple of candidates for
testing on the interwebs, but is anybody using a solution for this that they
like and/or
On 11 Jun 2010 at 7:45, Matthew W. Ross wrote:
As for HP's fall from grace: We still by HP. I would be ecstatic if HP would
offer a version of their drivers with just the .inf files and _required_
DLLs. Keep the full functionality bloatware separate, please!
I try to use only HP printers
On 11 Jun 2010 at 11:14, John Leto wrote:
Hey all, I was wondering for all of you Vipre users out there when you
submit a possible malware sample to Sunbelt do you ever receive a response
back on the submission? I receive a notification e-mail that they received the
sample but never
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
My question is: How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS
provider?
Sounds like you already got the right answer (just use one
Just make sure you inventory the IP addresses on any system where you
have multiple nic's. While not common, we had several systems with
issues wehre we had to redo the NIC settings after this. It ends up
being about 3 reboots all told.
Steven Peck
http://www.blkmtn.org
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at
Thanks that was as easy as the easy button.
Stefan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu
wrote:
What you’re seeing is the VM hardware version. You need to be running
VMware Tools from ESX 4.x before you upgrade them to v7.
Here’s how:
Shutdown the
Sweet. I know there's a plugin for FF that will let you load IE in a tab,
much like the feature in Chrome.
-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Java strangeness
On 14 Jun
Thanks Yes I do have some VM's on the DMZ, I make sure I'll have the proper
IP's and yes there are multiple re-boots needed.
Thanks
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Just make sure you inventory the IP addresses on any system where you
have multiple nic's.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming
angu...@geoapps.com wrote:
I try to use only HP printers which support Network Installs. These come for
the most part without the bloatware.
I used to do that, until one day we got some new LJ P2015's, and
when we installed the drivers,
IMO all modern printers are cheap Chinese made crap with obscenely high
toner costs.
That is why I started buying used refurbed HPs (LaserJet 4000s and
4100s). Refurbishment typically involves new rollers and fuser assembly.
Or buying used HPs on the cheap and having them serviced by a local
Hello, list,
After years of lobbying on my part, I have finally gotten top
management at %WORK% to approve a company password policy, complete
with enforcement via Active Directory/Group Policy. (And there was
much rejoicing!)
I know we have people who have never changed their password
On 15 Jun 2010 at 11:40, Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, n wrote:
Not looking to leave DBAN. Looking at options. I also have a need for a
tool that can be used remotely. I would like to clean Data drive and not
have to boot from cd.
Heidi's Eraser has a right-click option to erase an entire
Yes, it will interfere with accessing resources.
I had to schedule a day in our office so everyone knew well in advance.
Those that couldn't or chose not to be at work that day had an
administratively assigned password (in the event that they needed access),
or change their password in advance of
Hmm we did that ~ 2 yrs ago. We used to assign passwords but *finally* sold
it to upper mgt to do it via Active Dir and the built in complexity policy
(2003 native mode). It went pretty well, nobody lost access, they had to
change their passwords at next logon. We announced it well before hand
By the designated date. Top posted for your confusion.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, it will interfere with accessing resources.
I had to schedule a day in our office so everyone knew well in advance.
Those that couldn't or chose not to be
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897443.aspx
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:40, Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
joe.haral...@ge.com wrote:
Not looking to leave DBAN. Looking at options. I also have a need for a
tool that can be used remotely. I would like to clean Data drive
Yeah. I still go through the problem of user's passwords expiring and them
not able to access network resources. I typically have them pull up a
command prompt and attempt to access a mapped drive from the command prompt
to ensure they have just had a password expiration. Or I just tell them that
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming
angu...@geoapps.com wrote:
Heidi's Eraser has a right-click option to erase an entire
drive ... Not sure about NET USEd drives, though ...
I'm near-positive you won't be able to overwrite an *entire disk*
via NET USE . Mapped drives are
Ben,
They will have all sorts of problems accessing resources if you changed that
right now. :)
The remote people would be especially pleased with you. Depending on what
services they were trying to access, they *might* be told to change their
passwords, but many of the resources would just
Dang.
I was just curious...
How many IIS sites are there in the world? Roughly 780K. So if the
Sucuri.net's 111K number is accurate, that's about 1 in 7 IIS sites that
are affected.
Yikes.
Source:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/web-server-survey/
(most places on my search pointed
I don't know that I would say that Linux *always* had package management
going well -- certainly not all distros.
There was a time when Debian was highly regarded *because* of its excellent
package management system.
Redhat was next, and then RPM became a major standard because of their
More important to me is, How many discrete managers of IIS
systems/environments does this represent?
I mean, on one level, if a single ISP hosting 500 discrete sites for clients
is a victim, that's not exactly the same thing as those 500 clients failing
to manage this risk.
On the other hand
shaky foundation?
Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com 6/15/2010 2:42 PM
I don't know that I would say that Linux *always* had package management
going well -- certainly not all distros.
There was a time when Debian was highly regarded *because* of its excellent
package management system.
Redhat
Nor do they do the applications on a given distribution 'right' all
the time. You are essentially relying on 'some' random maintainer
to be doing something 'right' or at least agreed on and that their
choices will not nuke your existing configuration.
Steven Peck
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:42
Okay ... we had no problems maybe because we had assigned pw's which the
users could not change. We only had one VPN user - that never used it :-\
Now we have about 20 VPN users. We also executed the Group Policy and went
thru AD and checked force pw change at around 10PM and announced it many
Here's an update on the issue:
http://blog.armorize.com/2010/06/recent-evolution-of-mass-sql-injection.html
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 14:45, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
More important to me is, How many discrete managers of IIS
systems/environments does this represent?
I mean, on
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
In contrast, all the current Linux distributions were designed
right the [first] time, with strong package management from day one.
I don't know that I would say that Linux *always* had package management
going well --
Unlike say, some random software company that says their service pack,
hotfix or other update won't trash your machine.
MSFT/Adobe/others come to mind...
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 14:48, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Nor do they do the applications on a given distribution 'right' all
the
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
You are essentially relying on 'some' random maintainer
to be doing something 'right' or at least agreed on and that their
choices will not nuke your existing configuration.
Well, unless you write all software you use
Schedule the change for out of hours or during a quiet period), inform the
users, force all machines to log off.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 5:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Password policy enforcement after
*shaky foundation?*
The DOS, Win16 underpinnings...
Installed base is great when everything has been well laid out. Not so
great, when you're bound to earlier suboptimal decisions...
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blog.armorize.com/2010/06/recent-evolution-of-mass-sql-injection.html
So, as usual, the biggest problem is the large amount of server-side
web application software written by people who don't know how to write
secure
That just makes my head hurt.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an update on the issue:
http://blog.armorize.com/2010/06/recent-evolution-of-mass-sql-injection.html
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 14:45, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
More
Yes but with the Linux tree updates identifying the actual issue and
who has the authority to change / update / do it right can be
challenging. Debian had the Drupal CMS in their distributions for
years and despite many attempts we could not get that thing out of
their despite it being
SQLI and Blind SQLi are fun... You just need to go to some OWASP
meetings, it will start to make a lot of sense, that and scare the
living crap out of you, on how poorly web applications are written and
how much they are relied on to access very sensitive information in the
organization. Plus a
Definitely a nice write up, but when you comb your IIS logs and set seeing
DECLARE and CAST statements in the url sequences, you had better be on your
guard because those are some tell-tale signs of SQLi.. I don’t know of many
webapplications that are accepting that as INPUT.. so if you have
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Debian had the Drupal CMS in their distributions for
years and despite many attempts we could not get that thing out of
their despite it being old/unsecure/not-desired all because some guy
refused to remove it from the repo.
Problem is that its not IIS in itself that is the problem is the
web-application running on IIS that doesn't sanitize its input that is
the problem, that and probably using an Database user account with too
much privileges to access the backend, plus no auditing on the database
backend to track
Yes but then we get these threads bitching about MS IIS instead of
Crappy web page asp product X
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Problem is that its not IIS in itself that is the problem is the
web-application running on IIS that doesn’t sanitize its
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
... from No password expiration to X days ...
... 8-year-expired password before ...
Thank you, everyone, for your informative and helpful responses!
I think what I'll do is configure the password complexity
...
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Debian had the Drupal CMS in their distributions for
years and despite many attempts we could not get that thing out of
their despite it being
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
So as I have said. Pretty much every issue has not been patch
related. But having called MS we had help identifying the actual
cause of the issue.
That doesn't make Windows better at package management; it just
means if
You don't need a tool, just do an LDAP query for pwdLastSet. I would use
adfind as it will decode the timestamps, dump to a csv and massage in
excel.
Something along the lines of -
ADFIND -default -f ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user))
pwdLastSet -tdc -csv
-Original Message-
So I see that MS has a new Standard level Technet subscription:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/bb892756.aspx
Anyone know what exactly it contains? I haven't been able to find specifics
anywhere on their site, only TechNet Standard does not include some
enterprise editions of
You can find AdFind, along with many other goodies here:
http://joeware.net/freetools/tools/adfind/index.htm
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Password policy enforcement after a
http://blogs.technet.com/b/technetplussubscriptions/archive/2010/06/14/techn
et-subscriptions-standard-launches-today.aspx?wa=wsignin1.0
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Technet
So I see that MS
91 matches
Mail list logo
