Perhaps I'm misunderstanding: Isn't that exactly what Workgroup Manager does in
Open Directory? There are plenty of settings which can be applied to individual
Macs, users, user groups and computer groups.
As for Safari settings, you can add the com.apple.Safari plist (located in
Yes, Apple Remote Desktop (ARD) is $300 for 10 clients, $500 for unlimited. But
Mac OS X Server is $500 for unlimited clients, no CALs required. The client
software is $40/Mac. Compare that with Windows prices. And these are not the
costs of an upgrade version.
You make that money back on ARD
- Original Message -
From: James Hill
[mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tue, 07 Sep 2010
19:38:07 -0700
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
I find it hard to see the benefit of using Mac's in a corporate
How could you trust a non-physical inventory? Was there an allowed loss rate?
Anything disappearing from our district here is frowned upon greatly. We are
constantly warned of our State Auditor's disapproval, and mishandling of
state-funded equipment.
3rd party support tools for Open Directory
I think sdewilliam is saying that there is no modelling capability.
GPMC lets you pick a user, a computer and an AD site, and dynamically layers
all the policies at all levels that will affect the user, and gives you the
resulting effective settings (after group filtering, WMI filtering etc).
Question: how does one bring a Mac under scope of management of WGM?
For AD - the machine has to be joined to the domain. For Macs?
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 5:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Windows 7 has the best of both worlds, IMO.
As an admin, you can gain access to a computer that is locked by logging in
as a different user. You can do this without logging the other person off,
and without violating their session.
As Ken mentions, this maintains non-repudiation.
*ASB *(My
Couldn't you do this in Vista as well? I thought the ability to use fast-user
switching with domain joined machines was introduced with Vista...
Cheers
Ken
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 6:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mac and
Maybe. :)
I can't remember.I do have one domain-joined Vista machine that I can
check, so I'll let you know later today...
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Ken Schaefer
Yeah - I read the post from sdewilliman yesterday and thought wow - that's a
unsecure vector large enough to drive a tank through.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
I don't...
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mac and Windows mix
Please pardon the semi-hijack.
What solution do you use to give the Mac people remote access to their machines?
Thanks,
RS
On Tue,
The switch? The router NIC? Could be anything in theory, could just be
an auto negotiation issue?
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: 08 September 2010 12:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Connection speed
A customer has a fiber connection that download at 4.5mb/s if
Yes but what is strange that the dl speed is lower but the same for all Pcs in
the network, so I am pointing to something in the Zywall Nics
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Inviato: mercoledì 8 settembre 2010 13.33
A: NT System Admin Issues
If I were you, I would examine the specs on the Zywall firewall, either the
NIC configuration, or the actual firewall engine capability.
If this model was designed for consumer xDSL and not very current, it may
have been designed with 1.5mb/s WAN bandwidth in mind.
Erik Goldoff
IT
Typically, a Mac user has no elevated rights. SO, most malware would
run as a least rights user and go nowhere. (This too is a unix
security feature.)
I suggest this is a security posture commonly implemented on UNIX
systems by their admins. It is now significantly more common in Windows
I'm of two minds on this... in some cases it might be useful, but it
would obviously have to be logged as a security event.
-sc
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mac and Windows mix
Um... maybe the firewall?
-sc
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Connection speed
A customer has a fiber connection that download at 4.5mb/s if connected
straight to the ISP Router
When connected to
It's just treating the PC as a terminal server. My first thoughts are
that this could only be an issue where local resources are not
adequately secured or where you don't trust your admins. In either of
those scenarios, you have bigger fish to fry!
The only place I can see this being a problem
I suspect it , as also Erik told.
I'll give a look without it
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 8 settembre 2010 15.02
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Connection speed
Um... maybe the firewall?
-sc
From:
This is only one, tiny, aspect of implementing a security model (reading
Windows Internals by Russinovich/Solomon is highly recommended).
That said, Windows NT has had the same model since the first released version
(v3.1 back in 1993)
Cheers
Ken
From: John Aldrich
True. but NT was not a user operating system. J
John-AldrichPerception_2
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
This is only one, tiny, aspect of implementing a security
I believe WGM _can_ manage unbound machines, provided that you first import
them into WGM (Matt can correct if this is misinfo since we modified AD schema
leverage AD/WGM to manage users). Even then, that in itself, whether you do
it in an strictly OD environment or Magic Triangle, is a pain
Yes, and if you are the sole sysadmin that makes changes to WGM/policies are
diligent about tracking your changes, super. In an enterprise environment
there's no central reporting feature with WGM . One can utilize mcxquery to
find out what policies are applied to the client but that wd have
Agreed - I think the easiest thing to do is bypass the firewall and see how
things change from there.
From: HELP_PC g...@enter.it
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 9:05:58 AM
Subject: R: Connection
Yes, it was NT Workstation and NT Server were separate products.
I deployed NT Workstation 3.51 and NT Workstation 4.0 many times. Was it
missing some stuff? USB support was the biggest around the NT 4.0 time
frame. But it was a solid OS and had vastly superiour stability to Win3.1
compared to
Huh? What is a user operating system?
Cheers
Ken
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 10:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
True... but NT was not a user operating system. :)
From: Ken Schaefer
NT was never adopted as an end-user operating system, at least not by anyone
I know. It was primarily used as a server O/S except for a few specialized
situations. Granted, in my previous career, I did use an NT-based video
editing workstation, but most people I know used Win9x and it's successors
We supported 375,000 NT4 workstations and 10,000 NT Servers - I loved mine.
Except for no USB.
On 8 September 2010 16:05, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
NT was never adopted as an end-user operating system, at least not by
anyone I know. It was primarily used as a server O/S
Anyone here using Google for their corporate email? I've got a Google rep
trying to sell me on using their service instead of bringing email in-house.
I don't see the benefit, myself. Sure they have 99.999% uptime, but other
than that, what's the benefit? She says they can integrate with Active
Also the US Military standardized on NT workstation back in the mid 90's,
IIRC. I joined this list, mainly because I was using and deploying NT as a
workstation back in '97.
Just because it wasn't done by someone you know doesn't mean it wasn't done
at all.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, John
A wee bit OT but related...
We are a Notes shop. We are strongly considering going to a hosed -er-
hosted Exchange service (once we find someone who can import our current
Domino set-up and provide the proper guarantees). Lots of arguments in
favor of the hosted service.
Are you aware that
channeling Monty Python
Five-nines my buttocks.
/channeling Monty Python
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
The first thing I'd do before even looking at the technical stuff is
read their terms of service.
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: 08 September 2010 16:09
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Google email for corporate use
Anyone here using Google for their
How aggressive do you have Postini configured? That can have a WORLD of impact.
(I used to resell Postini, but I no longer do.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org]
Sent:
I am unsure if you can make it work with a modified AD schema alone. (I haven't
dared try.)
But yes, you join a Mac client to Open Directory just as you would join a
Windows computer to a windows Domain. It can be an Anonymous Bind, where the
mac is not added to the client list (and is only
Hmm. maybe worth considering getting our own spam/virus filtering appliance
then. currently our email is filtered by our ISP's RedCondor and it does a
good job of filtering. Very little junk gets through. Heck, it's at least as
good as SpamCop, which I use for my personal email. J
Any other
Even before that I would be working on a Security SLA for the contract
with the provider accordingly. And be prepared to audit that provider a
lot to ensure they are sticking to the SLA.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
I was under the impression that NT4 workstation was for users, business users
and 9x was for home, and small peer to peer networks. The company I worked for
at the time didn't have any 9x machines but maybe that was because they are an
engineering firm.
James
- Original Message -
Make sure your storage appliance drive connection method is approved for
your version of exchange. Used to be most NAS was not usable for exchange,
it would have to be DASD or SAN ( FC or iSCSI ). Just mapping as a network
attached drive is unsupported. ( I think NetApp had a MS widget that
I agree that NT was a user operating system. However, the real point is
that, at least as of Windows XP, a whole lot of user programs just
plain didn't work if you logged on as a regular user. Therefore, people
were trained to run with higher permissions to be able to get anything
done. I can't
I would like to add it to the ipad feedler.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
SQL Server 6.0/6.5 was a whole different kettle of fish to 7.0
Ken Schaefer
Architect | CTO Office | SOEasy Program
Microsoft MVP (Windows Server - IIS)
MCITP (EA, SA), MCTS (ISA, SQL Server, Hyper-V, Ops Manager, MOSS),
MCSE+Security, MCDBA
Mobile: +65 82485156 (SG) | +61 412 529 449 (AU)
HP
Read the very small print. Google owns everything on their server.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send
User vs Administrator privileges are only one small part of a security model.
In fact, Windows has many individual security rights, so user versus
administrator is a somewhat pointless comparison.
How do you ACL files, ports, threads, memory?
How do processes protect themselves from other
From Sunbelt's website:
All newsletters are available through an RSS reader. However lists
currently have RSS disabled as we await a software upgrade.
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Communities/
James
--
From: Steph Balog
I don't disagree with anything you said. The OP said that not making
the user run with elevated permissions has been a historical advantage
of *nix over Windows, and you countered that Windows had the same model
as of NT. I am simply saying that I don't believe that is an accurate
comparison.
Scenario: Full time Systems Engineer by day, IT consultant by night (4 clients
5 servers ~100 workstations).
Does it make sense to have any diversity in products (AV, patch management,
etc) or is it better to leverage knowledge? I ask because I would think it
makes more sense to stick with one
And we need to define what he means by userspace... as that infers
that his statement means he believes admin-owned processes run in...
kernel space?
If so, that's an incorrect understanding.
-sc
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010
You could go either way. I think that being able to provide diverse
solutions is much better for the client; many clients will balk at using
%vendor% and being able to provide them with an alternative is advantageous.
At the same time, being able to efficiently install and configure a product
Funny, it was my user OS since pre-beta.
Are you speaking of the NT family, or strictly the versions of the
same codebase named NT?
-sc
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and
We're using Kerio Connect and there's no restrictions on where you store data.
--
Bob Hartung
Wisco Industries, Inc.
736 Janesville St.
Oregon, WI 53575
Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
Fax: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
_
From: John Aldrich
+1
And user rights assignments. And granularity for ACL's.
The NT executive kernel supports a superset of the primitives needed by
either the Win32 protected mode subsystem, or UNIX. This is why you
can(could) run UNIX or Win32 processes atop the same underlying kernel.
(And OS/2 as well,
You date yourself?!?!? Interesting place to come out...
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
+1
And user rights assignments. And granularity for ACL’s.
The NT executive kernel supports a superset of the primitives needed by
either the Win32
I think you're trying to overcomplicate things. All I meant is that the
end-user normally runs as a non-privileged user and so any application they
run is going to run as a non-privileged user. Windows has had that ability
since the NT days, but has it really been usable? IME, no. Most
I was wondering who pays for dinner myself...
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Don Ely
Strictly NT. Windows 2000 was much more user friendly but was, IMO, more
of a server O/S, even W2K Workstation.
John-AldrichPerception_2
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and
LUA has been around for ages. A lot of places had to find a way to work
within the framework of LUA. I think the last time I worked somewhere that
users had admin access to their PC's was 1999 or so...
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
I think
C'mon... everybody does it.
I just buy myself a nice dinner first.
-sc
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mac and Windows mix
You date yourself?!?!? Interesting place to come out...
On
Your understanding is flawed.
None of my users ran as administrators in the school I had on NT. The
applications might've wanted to run as admin, but I was able to get around
it in every case. It's the sysadmin's job, after all.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, John Aldrich
U... really?!?! Both NT4 and 2k were written off of the same code
base... 2k3 and XP as well...
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:34 AM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Strictly NT. Windows 2000 was much more “user friendly” but was, IMO,
more of a “server” O/S, even W2K
There were differences between the Workstation model and the Server model.
Microsoft put them there.
NT3.51/NT4/w2k all of these were viable and useful workstations (not
servers).
Steven
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote:
U... really?!?! Both NT4 and 2k
Subtle differences, but I agree with you...
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
There were differences between the Workstation model and the Server model.
Microsoft put them there.
NT3.51/NT4/w2k all of these were viable and useful workstations (not
servers).
http://uploads.cleargraphix.com/peer.png
I don't know what version my customer is running of IIS or Server but, I
think this is probably a general DNS issue. The page is suppose to pull in
an iframe that has a search box in it. External of the network it works
fine. However, internally on their
Looks like a problem with ISA. Can you bypass the proxy for that address?
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Tristan sunnrun...@gmail.com wrote:
http://uploads.cleargraphix.com/peer.png
I don't know what version my customer is running of IIS or Server but, I
think this is probably a general
And I hear you're a really cheap date.
Shook
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
+1
And user rights assignments. And granularity for ACL's.
The NT executive kernel
You have NO idea.
What I once did for a ketchup packet I won't mention here.
-sc
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
And I hear you're a really cheap date.
Naw. I ain't driving that far...
Shook
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
You would know.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
I thought your thing was pudding like that old lady in the retirement village
on Night Court. I'm now officially scared that that was the first thing that
popped into my head.
Shook
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:10 PM
To: NT System
And I can proudly say I have _NO_ idea what you are talking about.
Freak.
-sc
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
I thought your thing was pudding like that old lady
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0660573/quotes
Shook
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
And I can proudly say I have _NO_ idea what you are talking about.
Freak.
-sc
From:
Wow:
Mrs. Smith: [about her prostitution] Sometimes I do it for pudding.
Andy Shook: Sometimes I do it *in* pudding.
Mrs. Smith: Sometimes I do it for green stamps. And sometimes I do it
just for kicks.
Bull Shannon: [to Roz] Can you imagine degrading yourself for green
stamps?
Andy
Ahhh. SH Green Stamps. Those were the days.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
Wow:
Mrs. Smith: [about her prostitution] Sometimes I do it for pudding.
Andy Shook:
And remember to be coy with yourself. And bring home flowers.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
C'mon... everybody does it.
I just buy myself a nice dinner
They can use something like proxify.com and get to the page with no errors
if that is what you mean.
Not sure how they have it setup but definitely and internal config issue I
assume?
thanks, t
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Eric Wittersheim
eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like a
It depends where the diversity and specialty are going to be.
Specializing in relational database platforms, CRM, ERP or enterprise
messaging makes a lot of sense.
Specializing in AV or patch management or office productivity suites is less
useful.
Specializing in OS platforms is a mixed bag --
Then who was using it? Robots?
I've been running NT since v3.5 (I played with a 3.1 installation for a
while, but it was mainly on our servers).
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM, John
***NT was never adopted as an end-user operating system, at least not by
anyone I know*
You need a larger circle of friends.
*** I’m just happy that Microsoft finally got with the program and stopped
letting users run as the local admin by default.*
Your frame of reference needs recalibrating.
Yep same, MCSE in 4.0 MCSA 2000, nothing for 2k3, prolly nadda for
Win2k8.
But I have to say I am liking SQL 2005/SQL 2008, maybe enough to study
for the MCITP in SQL 2005/2008 accordingly.
Also quick question about IIS 7.0.
I am reading the IIS 7 Implementation and Administration
How does the way applications have been written, but developers who insist
on developing code with full rights, prevent you from comparing the security
models of *nix and Windows?
A model is a model is a model, and the wrong permissions will break an app
not prepared to deal with the wrong
Try setting that address in Tools, Internet Options, connections, LAN
Settings, Advanced, Do not use proxy for these addresses. You can set that
in a GPO if you like too.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Tristan sunnrun...@gmail.com wrote:
They can use something like proxify.com and get to the
And what, exactly, made Windows 2000 Workstation more of a server O/S?
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Strictly NT. Windows 2000 was
Thanks for the help. Hopefully that should work.
Thanks again, T
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Eric Wittersheim
eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote:
Try setting that address in Tools, Internet Options, connections, LAN
Settings, Advanced, Do not use proxy for these addresses. You can set
I'm hard to get with myself.
-sc
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
And remember to be coy with yourself. And bring home flowers.
From: Steven M. Caesare
And never accept money from yourself.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
I'm hard to get with myself.
-sc
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Awww I'm out of popcorn already...
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mac and Windows mix
If you accept/trust the advice on this list, why do you cling to
Anything???
I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I can do quite a lot with MS
Office, Open Office, Visio, IE, Google Chrome, Thunderbird, Adobe, and a number
of other apps quite efficiently on 2000 or XP with no admin privvies...
Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE
Thumb-typed from my HTC
+10
Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE
Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse
brevity any misspellings.
- Reply message -
From: Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 3:05 pm
Subject: Mac and Windows mix
To: NT System Admin Issues
I just went through this and turned out to be the MTU. Our Sonicwall MTU was
1500, our fiber provider was 9000, but we had to lower it to 1404 to get any
consistency.
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R:
http://secunia.com/advisories/41340/
Heads up, more fun from Adobe Land!
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
I wasn't aware that there was one. I wish there was and I wish Sunbelt would
set their forums up for RSS. Cisco finally got around to it and it's great.
(Much better than getting 200+ emails per day just from their forums.)
From: validemai...@gmail.com
To:
I leave it on the nightstand where I'll find it later.
-sc
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
And never accept money from yourself.
From: Steven M. Caesare
Do you ever feel short changed?
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
I leave it on the nightstand where I'll find it later.
-sc
From: Maglinger, Paul
Keep saving, you'll get to 40 quarters eventually.
Shook
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac and Windows mix
I leave it on the nightstand where I'll find it later.
-sc
From: Maglinger,
You either extend the schema with the needed attributes or bind (in addition
to AD) to an OpenDirectory server (an OSX Server running Open Directory).
If said OpenDirectory server is also bound to AD then you can create objects
on it that just augment an existing AD objects for mac (Management
Just to note anyone having the same issue I was.
the iframe was referencing
domain.com
instead of
www.domain.com
and that fixed the problem.
Thanks, T
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Tristan sunnrun...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the help. Hopefully that should work.
Thanks again, T
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, without editing the plist you can walk up to any Macs with password
protected screensaver on, enter the admin pswd boom there's the user's
desktop at your disposal.
I wish Windows had that option.
Windows 7 has
Not sure anyone mentioned this or not..
Looks pretty neat, they have some you tube videos on it.
http://www.google.com/instant/#utm_campaign=launch
http://www.google.com/instant/#utm_campaign=launchutm_medium=vanutm_sourc
e=instant utm_medium=vanutm_source=instant
I don't know if it
***The fact that it was darn difficult to do much of anything without
admin privileges?**
*
You know, considering that this is a technical list, I generally expect
precise, technical answers to specific questions.
Things were hard... fails to approach the level of expected precision.
Many people
Nope, I really wouldn't even want this as an option.
I hear what you're saying, but that feature would be way too easy to abuse.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ben Scott
Agreed. While off the cuff it sounds like a great idea, I also see WAY too much
opportunity for abuse. Many of us already don't have time to audit logs the way
we should as it is, and I don't see that getting any better any time soon. Just
because it is auditable, does not mean that anyone is
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
