Can you control this by NTFS access to the .evt file itself?
On 27 October 2010 16:31, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Running a Windows 2008 R2 DFL/FFL domain, security team needs a service
account to have read only access to the Security Eventlog accordingly. Is
there a way via
I don't see any issue upgrading the hosts. If you have spare storage and can
afford the downtime, then export the VMs first prior to upgrade. That gives you
an easy way to restore if required.
Do you have any compelling reason to do upgrade though?
Cheers
Ken
From: Bob Anderson
I have a logon script GPO for some terminal server users that I want to
apply to a specific OU, but not the sub-OUs, and I don't want to use the
Block Inheritance feature. Can I security filter the GPO by a computer
group, or will this stop the GPO from running as it contains some user
settings?
It certainly is knee-jerk if it's on this basis alone. AV just barely
does its job. Heuristics don't work. Different vendors take different
amounts of time with different malware to get sigs out and working. All
vendors have false positives. Most have or will release a bad update.
It is pure
Thanks Webster, but I must have lost out somehow - because it doesn't look
any different than it did earlier. I do not see any comments of any kind
anywhere on the page. :-(
--
ME2
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:
Right here ME2:
Yep, they are gone now.
Sorry
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: WindowsSecurity.com/Chris Sanders reviews VIPRE Enterprise.
Thanks Webster, but I must have lost out somehow - because it doesn't look
any different than it did earlier. I do not
You are on the right track. Add Loopback Policy Processing to the mix.
Personally, I usually separate out computer and user settings, unless there's a
compelling reason not to (the settings are closely linked for applicability
reasons) or you only have a small number of GPOs
Cheers
Ken
From:
I have already enabled the loopback to get the user settings to apply, so
filtering by computer should work OK, cool.
I like to keep all the GPOs separate too, but this is the final throes of a
dying domain. I'd have had the servers in separate sub-OUs of an empty OU if
it had been up to me, and
I have been tasks by the head company to update adobe reader etc. I am reading
remove all old versions, then install new. Updates are by default downloaded.
And that this is one big headache,
Any tips, tricks, words of wisdom? I do not have sms, just wsus (windows
updates).
Luke L.
I know Windows 2008 AD supports fine-grained password policies, I also
thought this was done through adsiedit voodoo such as documented here (
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770842%28WS.10%29.aspx). I have
a team of consultants on site who are telling me that fine-grained password
Use AD msi deployment (if you have AD)
On 28 October 2010 13:00, Brumbaugh, Luke
luke.brumba...@butlerschein.comwrote:
I have been tasks by the head company to update adobe reader etc. I am
reading remove all old versions, then install new. Updates are by default
downloaded. And that this
You should find you can deploy the MSI via Group Policy and it'll take
care of everything for you.
Take a look at the Adobe Customization Tool as well as you can disable
things like checking for updates.
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: 28 October 2010
I think they are full of it. Although I admit to the possibility that they've
discovered something that I just didn't know about.
Joeware.net has a free tool for dealing with pso's. recommended.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: James
Well I have just talked to them about it, and their stutters lead me to
believe that they may indeed be full of it...
They are going to have a look at how it is implemented
Ideally I'd just like to be able to test it myself though. Killjoys.
On 28 October 2010 13:18, Michael B. Smith
I don't believe so, since a service basically has the .EXTX files open
by default.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Maybe this? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323076
On 27 October 2010 16:31, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Running a Windows 2008 R2 DFL/FFL domain, security team needs a service
account to have read only access to the Security Eventlog accordingly. Is
there a way via the Default
PSOs are assigned to users or groups - they are not able to be assigned to OUs.
All that such a proposed policy would do is change the password policy for
local accounts on that Citrix server.
Cheers
Ken
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 28 October 2010 8:24 PM
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't make the mistake of putting the RFID tag in the hand or wrist,
because then they'll just lop off your arm. Go for a major organ,
like the skull.
::Thinks of the end of Mad Max::
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Thanks for the confirmations guys.
I now feel more confident about going and talking to these consultants about
it - not that I'm bitter about being left out of the design process or
anything :-) But hey, it's me who's going to have to support it when they
leave...
On 28 October 2010 13:34, Ken
Just give them two VMs - a DC and a Citrix box and ask them to demo how exactly
their approach is going to work... :)
Cheers
Ken
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 28 October 2010 8:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Windows 2008 password policies
Yeah I saw that article, problem is one screw up and you could waste the
eventlogs on all the DC's and the DC's are in production, I rather not
have to play around trying to calculate the codes for SDDL and stuff.
With as many DC's as I have Id have to update the .INF file, register
it, on all the
I really like our Kyocera FS-4000DN workgroup printers. They are good, solid
machines that just work about 99.9% of the time. The thing that will
really make or break a printer, in my opinion, is the support. When a
printer has a problem that you can't fix by just power-cycling it or
removing a
I take it giving the service account admin access to the DCs is a big no-no
as well :-) or, I suppose, rather defeats the object
On 28 October 2010 13:47, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Yeah I saw that article, problem is one screw up and you could waste the
eventlogs on all the
Yep, DC access is strictly limited, especially with the new Win2k8R2
Domain.
If Manage Audit and Security Logs user right along with EventLog Readers
group access doesn't cut it for them, then ohh well.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan
+1. We use Kyocera almost exclusively here (except for a few old
inkjets, and some Lexmark units that were bought by the previous IT Manager)
in the office environment. We love them, but you'll want to make sure that
the folks who would support it are responsive so that on the rare occasions
You can set the SDDL using a GPO:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/08/12/event-logging-policy-settings-in-windows-server-2008-and-vista.aspx
And testing something before implementing it is what IT admins do. You'd have
to test and implement this first in your Dev/Test/UAT
I would have thought that user right should do it, to be fair
On 28 October 2010 13:55, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Yep, DC access is strictly limited, especially with the new Win2k8R2
Domain.
If Manage Audit and Security Logs user right along with EventLog Readers
group
AND worth checking for firmware updates for the drives and controller
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
jra...@eaglemds.com wrote:
+1
We’ve also re-scanned arrays (on HP, specifically) and seen the array come
back as healthy with no errors – and run that way for
It should, but it gives a bit more access than is needed ( it also
allows you to clear the logs)
Checking in Miansi Windows 2008 R2 book and Moskowitz GPO book to see if
I can find anymore nuggets of knowledge on this.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
That option enables the user to manage the logs - including clearing events. If
read access only is required, then using the log access GPO setting is
preferable.
Cheers
Ken
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 28 October 2010 9:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
MBS and KS are correct, your conslutants are full of crap. Are you sure you
want to use these people? I don't think I would let them anywhere near a DC
or XenApp server.
Webster
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Subject: Windows 2008 password policies
I know
Yep, dully noted, but again with workload, and not that much familiarity
with the SDDL and the GPO set, I will go with user rights/Eventlog
Reader group and call it a day.
Sometimes hate not knowing GPO's and stuff better, would help out on the
workload.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP,
Don't make me any more nervous. They are designing everything, AD, Exchange,
AppSense, Citrix. They took one look at my designs when I first got here and
binned them. From what I have seen the logon time for the new domain is
already nearing two minutes. But as I am a contractor I am keeping my
Could you not just setup a job to copy the security.evtx file to somewhere
else and let them access that?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:48 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you control this by NTFS access to the .evt file itself?
On 27 October 2010 16:31, Ziots, Edward
I always forget that - thanks for the reminder, Erik. So easy to forget...
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
You may want to raise your concerns with the client, so you aren't seen as part
of the problem.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin
I am doing so, but want to tread carefully as they are reportedly paying
these guys upward of a million pounds for the solution they are building.
Why I'm not in the business of tendering for projects like this, I may never
know.
On 28 October 2010 14:35, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
Holy Crap, for $1,591,458 US Dollars, MBS and I can come over and do this!
LOL
Webster
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Subject: Re: Windows 2008 password policies
I am doing so, but want to tread carefully as they are reportedly paying
these guys upward of a
Its for Vericept, and they need to read the logs in realtime to
correlate what is seen on the network with a user.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Cameron
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Why I'm not in the business of tendering for projects like this, I may never
know.
I know that feeling.
Circa 2003, my role was contracted IT consultant, i.e., IT whore.
I'm no special expert. I've never been to a
Not sure about GL, but DL G5 is hotswap (I suspect that GL will be the same).
For re-assurance, do a backup prior to pulling the failed drive.
Since it's a DC, and you have others, it's not a huge deal (unless you have
applications hard coded to use this DC - plenty of those around IME).
a)
I had to do this a year or so ago. It's not really too hard. There is a
tool that I used to determine what the appropriate SDDL strings were. If I
can dig it up today, I'll pass it on.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Nice summation of everyone's input, Ken.
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Ken Schaefer
You're not going to have access to copy the eventlogs from a scripting
standpoint -- not while the system is running, anyway.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Cameron
Tender away :)
But tendering is full of risk. You could be undercut by some other outfit that
can talk-the-talk, but can't deliver. Which leaves you with nothing, and drives
you to bidding for deals that you don't understand at low cost. :)
Coming from a re-assuring expensive consulting
'What is the best oil for my motorcycle'.
LOL ... sounds all too familiar ... maybe you know me, ... as Yoda ? Royal
Star Venture
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org
wrote:
Haha, yea I thought we were going there when I first asked but I still
Cool appreciate it.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
AppDeploy has tons of good info.
And bookmark the Adobe FTP site.
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adobe acrobat reader updates
You should find you can deploy the MSI via Group Policy
Hi Guys,
I am about to undertake a new project which as the subject line states its
turning our current file server into a vm. Its currently a clustered windows
system (2 x nx1950's) connected via SAS to an md3000 + md1000. The quantity of
data living on the storage is in or around 6TB (allot
I've seen comments and have been advised by a couple of vendors that vmware
don't support MPIO from within the guest, so if you want to do MPIO to the LUNs
you might be faced with using VMDK or RDM.
I've never pinned them down on a black and white source for this, but I can't
see why they'd
I've seen comments and have been advised by a couple of vendors that vmware
don't support MPIO from within the guest, so if you want to do MPIO to the LUNs
you might be faced with using VMDK or RDM.
I havent heard this one before we are using the Dell Equallogic MPIO
connecting to PS6000
That's the fun part, it's all anecdotal, I can find nothing in black and white
from vmware but I can't figure out why a vendor would tell me that either, so
make of it what you will I guess, just something to throw into the mix.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roche
Lots of money to be made, coming in AFTER another company has screwed the pooch.
I've worked as a sub on lots of enterprise deals, but if I can't architect the
Exchange solution and have a say in the AD solution, I'll just walk away
(unless I know the people involved already and trust them).
Nope, I am 'Neon'. Kawi Nomad.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VMWare vs Hyper-V
'What is the best oil for my motorcycle'.
LOL ... sounds all too familiar ... maybe you know me, ... as Yoda ?
I think you already know why you're not. The crap spouting prerequisite
gets you every time.
That, and your lack of soullessness.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, James Rankin
***Lots of money to be made, coming in AFTER another company has screwed
the pooch.*
Sometimes. :)
Sometimes, too much of the money was eaten up in the first go round...
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Thu, Oct
So, does your current backup plan handle 2TB files well, or however large
you plan to create the vmdk files?
I'll admit, I'm unfamiliar with this notion of using a VMDK/vmfs on a SAN
for what is ultimately file storage. My gut is telling me that it is just
adding needless complexity for little
The main benefit from using a VMDK would be snapshots, I imagine. We
did a similar thing and I ultimately decided to mount the storage as a
raw LUN. I chose that direction because I felt it was the most flexible
thing to do, and I was concerned about the extra overhead the VMDK added
in dealing
You really don't want to be taking snapshots of that kind of data volume
at VMDK level. The IO when you delete the snapshots and it does the
merge will be simple horrific.
RDM or MS iSCSI from within the guest would get my vote (I'll be making
the same decision in a couple of months just with
The backup solution will be robust we are implementing a new hardware layer for
this using disk based backup . Regarding the vmfs solution being more complex
the idea is its allot more easier to manage. From reading allot of
documentation it seems to be indicating the vmfs volumes with large
You can do snapshots with EqualLogic arrays... And even mount them as a
separate volume.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.govwrote:
The main benefit from using a VMDK would be snapshots, I imagine. We did
a similar thing and I ultimately decided to mount the
want to tread carefully as they are reportedly paying these guys
upward of a million pounds
All the more reason to raise the issue with your clients if you want to
maintain credibility. What ended up called FGPP in 2008 was one of the
top features requested in AD since its inception and the
Equallogic snapshots work very well we use them as one of our backup methods. I
think he was referring to a vm level snapshot which is something we wouldn't be
doing.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/
I'm basically doing the same thing you want to, just not the amount of
data you are talking about. I have my 2008R2 VM connected to it's file
share data via Iscsi initiator inside the VM. That way the volumes can
be directly snapped on my EQ boxes without any concern for the VM
itself. I've
We have an SQL vm already setup using ISCSI point at luns on the san using the
equallogic mpio this is very straight forward to configure and works well. We
wont be clustering the file server it will be a single vm protected by the usua
vmware features. Its just the backend I am interested in.
do not confuse sales and delivery
LOL! I think I have to steal that for my signature file!
-Jeff Steward
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Tender away J
But tendering is full of risk. You could be undercut by some other outfit
that can
I think that is a valid concern. I'm not entirely sure that Microsoft will
even stay in the phone OS market unless they can find to gain a significant
portion of the smart-phone market, and how many companies are willing to
re-write apps for 4 different OSes?
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:33 PM,
do not confuse sales and delivery
Webster says: Nothing is impossible to the one who doesn't have to do the
work!
Webster
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 password policies
Tender away J
But tendering is full of risk. You could be
Ok, so I'll let you in on a little secret. I'm a pack rat.
I'm trying to changereally.
I've got a ton of trade publications, dating back years:
Information Week
CIO Decisions
Technet
Windows IT Pro
Storage
Information Security
And I'm sure a few others.
For those of you that subscribe to
Toss.
I have pack rat tendencies. I have a toss if I haven't used it in a year
policy to help myself. Of course, some exceptions are made
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
jra...@eaglemds.com wrote:
Ok, so I’ll let you in on a little secret. I’m a pack rat.
I used to get 4-5 a week, all free rags, so they were mostly ads. When I
found an article that was noteworthy, I just either ripped it out or
grabbed the article online, if available.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W.
You can get on TV and they will help you throw them away. Less work for you.
http://tlc.discovery.com/tv/hoarding-buried-alive/
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: trade publications - toss
When they reach a certain age, I skim them and pull the pages I think might be
useful and recycle the rest.
Thanks,
Mathew
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: trade publications - toss
I keep all my Windows IT Pro just because it's so hands on and has great
screenshots. That's it.
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: trade publications - toss or archive?
Ok, so I'll
I find it easier to scan in the articles/pages I find interesting and
then recycle the magazine...
So, my messy papaers just become messy files...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage
I still keep my TechNet and Windows IT Pro mags. I threw out all the other
mags I had dating back to 1984. I had to get permission from my office
landlord to throw them all away because I filled up the dumpster for the
building! City recycling didn't want that much paper.
Webster
I save them until I get so disgusted by seeing a pile of magazines that
haven't been read in years that I throw them out.
I'm thinking of changing my approach, btw.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
jra...@eaglemds.com wrote:
Ok, so I’ll let you in on a little secret.
I still have the Windows IT Pro mags too. I get rid of the CIO, Information
week, etc. type pubs. I do have about 30 years of Model Railroading mags that
I
won't get rid of :)
My other bad habit is keeping those thick Software books like NT 4.0
Networking,
SMS Admin Scripting, Teach
Now that I have figured out how to update adobe.
My next question is what do you guys use for patch management.
What do you think of EminentWare for wsus?
Is there something better?
Luke L. Brumbaugh
Network Engineer
Butler Animal Health Supply
Ph:(614) 659-1736
+1 and my Technet as well, all others go to the men's reading room.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: trade publications - toss or archive?
I keep all my Windows IT Pro just because it's so hands on
And this is how we get lusers thinking they know about IT...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
+1 and my Technet as well, all others go to the men’s reading room.
*From:* Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:39
The way technology changes so rapidly anything over a year old is old
news. I wouldn't keep anything unless it relates specifically to your
environment and you don't have it documented anywhere else.
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010
They have to be capable of thinking first
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: trade publications - toss or archive?
And this is how we get lusers thinking they know about IT...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at
Fixed that for you.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:
The way technology changes so rapidly anything over a year old is “*ancient
history*”. I wouldn’t keep anything unless it relates specifically to
your environment and you don’t have it documented
No they don't, they just read an article and become an instant expert. No
thinking required!!
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:06 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
They have to be capable of thinking first……..
*From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 28, 2010
It's better than using leaves or your hand, but I digress
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: trade publications - toss or archive?
O, I was supposed to use those for reading!!! Crap, that
At which time I quiz them and expose their cluelessness! It's in my job
description!
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: trade publications - toss or archive?
No they don't, they just read an article and
Paper cuts are just brutal. J
Webster
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Subject: RE: trade publications - toss or archive?
It's better than using leaves or your hand, but I digress
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: trade publications -
Dear Mr. Eagle Raper,
I throw mine away most of the time, sometimes I might skim through them before
doing so. I do have a subscription to Motortrend that never seems to end here
at the office and I have no idea why but I do read that every month when it
shows up.
James
- Original
I can't believe you went THERE.
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: trade publications - toss or archive?
Paper cuts are just brutal. :)
Webster
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Subject: RE:
An Expert is someone who knows more than the general population about a given
field. (I'm the local Expert on Active Directory, but I don't know as much as
most of you.)
A Professional is someone who gets paid to do the work. (I get paid to deal
with Active Directory.)
These two are not
You presume that they talk to you and not someone above your pay grade...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:13 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
At which time I quiz them and expose their cluelessness! It’s in my job
description!
*From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday,
Shavlik. Haven't tried EminentWare.
Dave
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Patch Management
Now that I have figured out how to update adobe.
My next question is what do you guys use for
Well so am I. My coworkers and I get along quite well. :-)
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
They avoid my boss like the plague and there’s only one person above him
– the CEO. Besides, I’m a very approachable know it all!
*From:* Jonathan Link
+1 for Shavlik, working through the pain in V 7.6.0 at the moment, but
its getting better, next step is getting the agents functioning as
expected.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
Folks,
A colleague here asked if there was some built-in way to replicate files from
one of his Win 7 PCs to his other PC (laptop to desktop for example). Aside
from robocopy or synctoy, is there a built-in program for this in Win 7?
Thanks,
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,
He just wants to sync two folders between two computers?
Funny, I think robocopy and synctoy will be your 1st and 2nd choice.
Other ideas:
DFS-R (on 2 servers)
something like Dropbox
What is he trying to accomplish?
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Tom
Just to be extra helpful the tool he's referring to is here:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3993
Among to tweaks you can do to Reader, one of them is to remove previous
versions if they are found automatically.
This will extract the MSI needed for an
He has a large number of files under my \my documents folder and wants to
synchronize them to his secondary PC.
Tom
Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org 10/28/2010 2:57 PM
He just wants to sync two folders between two computers?
Funny, I think robocopy and synctoy will be your 1st and
kbox, but the appliance is also software distribution, remote control,
inventorying, etc.
Brumbaugh, Luke luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com 10/28/2010 1:54 PM
Now that I have figured out how to update adobe.
My next question is what do you guys use for patch management.
What do you think of
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
