RE: Freeware PDF creator?

2010-11-16 Thread Crawford, Scott
I'd like to see that batch file if you don't mind. I really miss their MSI option lately. -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 9:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Freeware PDF creator? On 10 Nov 2010 at

RE: Workstation names and who it belongs to

2010-11-16 Thread Ames Matthew B
nope. My first name is rl-mbames, my second machine is rl-mbames-1, the third machine is rl-mbames-2 and so forth. If there was a second Matthew B Ames in the company, their logon name would mbames1, thus their machines would be rl-mbames1, rl-mbames1-1, rl-mbames1-2, and so on. A third

Re: Workstation names and who it belongs to

2010-11-16 Thread Rene de Haas
I like that trick. We used location and a number, nothing user related and kept a database. We also renamed my computer to username-computername in the login script to make it easier for IT people. On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.ukwrote: I have our logon

Maximum number of printers/print drivers

2010-11-16 Thread James Rankin
Is there a limit to the amount of printer connections you can have on a Windows 2008 R2 server? I've just tried adding about 315 printer connections to a single (test) server and it seems to be struggling - to the stage where it no longer appears to be able to enumerate the printers in the Devices

RE: Maximum number of printers/print drivers

2010-11-16 Thread Ames Matthew B
On our 2003 servers, we seem to have about 180 printers before moving to the next server, thus we have a couple of servers per site. Not sure on any figures as to why 180 queues per server, as I suspect it was all part of the package when the printers were installed by Xerox. I have nothing to

Re: Maximum number of printers/print drivers

2010-11-16 Thread James Rankin
Actually I am not sure if the limit I am experiencing is a user rather than a machine limit. Once I get over about 190 connections for one user, problems seem to begin. Not that I can see any of our production users needing so many connections, but I was just wondering if there was a set limit.

Re: Add/Remove programs showing blank on Windows 2003 SP2 Server

2010-11-16 Thread Jon Harris
How long are you waiting before giving up? If only a minute or two give it some time. Like about 5 if you are going beyond 5 minutes and still getting that message the server is either over worked or owned by someone else. At least that has been my experience and more from the client side but I

RE: Add/Remove programs showing blank on Windows 2003 SP2 Server

2010-11-16 Thread Haritwal, Dhiraj
I have waited for couple of MINS / Hours but no luck. There is no over utilization on this Server. any other clue. Regards, Dhiraj From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Add/Remove programs showing blank

Re: Add/Remove programs showing blank on Windows 2003 SP2 Server

2010-11-16 Thread Jon Harris
I have seen this many times when the machine has a virus/malware on it. When it got to that state it was time to start over. Someone else may have a solution other than that but unless you are really sure it does not have malware on it that is what I would do. Jon On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11

Otish Acceptable network QOS

2010-11-16 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Ok, we are putting out a request for proposals to upgrade/redo our links between our buildings. We have 100 MB fiber between our locations dedicated to us, we are ramping up to gig. Right now I can ping a server or anything else around town with 1 ms delays and we never see packet loss. We

RE: Otish Acceptable network QOS

2010-11-16 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
Correction limitations issues occur at the transceiving limit should read: limitation issues occur at the transceiving nodes Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com

RE: Workstation names and who it belongs to

2010-11-16 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
Ditto. Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com -Original Message- From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE:

RE: Workstation names and who it belongs to

2010-11-16 Thread Paul Hutchings
As requested, I can't claim the credit for this, I forget where but I stumbled upon it somewhere and modified it to suit with the variables I wanted: '- 'Sets the AD Computer Description to the User/Dept

RE: Citrix Licensing indestructible user account

2010-11-16 Thread Webster
I turned this into an article for you: http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=16700 Thanks Carl Webster Citrix Technology Professional http://dabcc.com/Webster From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Subject: Citrix Licensing indestructible user account I

Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread David Lum
Anyone know how to hide PSSHUTDOWN output? I have a .CMD file that calls it and sends username and password that I don't want the person who invokes it to see. I have tried the NUL at the end but that doesn't work, and I combed the switches for the tool and came up empty. David Lum // SYSTEMS

RE: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Ken Schaefer
VBScript has an execute option that can hide the command window. But really this is just security-through-obscurity. Anyone can accidently edit rather than run the file, and there's the username/password. Maybe to be a bit more secure - write a little service. The service has the credentials

Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: VBScript has an execute option that can hide the command window. But really this is just security-through-obscurity. Anyone can accidently “edit” rather than “run” the file, and there’s the username/password. +1

..and now for something completely different..

2010-11-16 Thread David Lum
Small network, subnet is 25-bit. Been fine for years, no recent changes, except as described below. ServerA: 2003 R2 is a DHCP server (also DC, DNS, file/print etc). ServerA sits on hardware that will get flatted and 2008 R2 on it, so I stand up ServerB, again with 2003 R2. I make it a DHCP

RE: ..and now for something completely different..

2010-11-16 Thread Joseph L. Casale
AFAIK, Windows clients prefer the dhcp server they used originally and hence why you prolly got lucky. Once it left the picture, all others were now possible options. jlc From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

Re: ..and now for something completely different..

2010-11-16 Thread Candee
Did you have the IP of server 1 hardcoded in the Linksys? On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: Small network, subnet is 25-bit. Been fine for years, no recent changes, except as described below. ServerA: 2003 R2 is a DHCP server (also DC, DNS, file/print

RE: ..and now for something completely different..

2010-11-16 Thread Kennedy, Jim
ServerA was faster at answering than the Linksys router. The Linksys router is faster at answering than ServerB. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 12:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: ..and now for something completely different.. Small

RE: Add/Remove programs showing blank on Windows 2003 SP2 Server

2010-11-16 Thread Carl Houseman
A bad entry in the uninstall registry can cause something like this. The most typical example of this in the past was Autocad which created a bad entry for DisplayIcon. So if nothing else, you might scan through the uninstall registry keys looking for a DisplayIcon value that ends with ,-1.

Re: ..and now for something completely different..

2010-11-16 Thread Jeff Bunting
Specifically, they will try to renew their existing lease with the leasing DHCP server once half of the lease duration time has gone by. Jeff On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: AFAIK, Windows clients prefer the dhcp server they used

Re: OT: Shoretel

2010-11-16 Thread Jonathan Bible
Contact info? On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, RS rich...@gmail.com wrote: Any Shoretel users out there I can bounce some questions off of? Off list, of course. Thanks, RS ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: OT: Shoretel

2010-11-16 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Going way out on a limb here, but maybe: rich...@gmail.com From: Jonathan Bible [mailto:jtbi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Shoretel Contact info? On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, RS

VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Cameron
Good afternoon all! Well, the VPN issue has expanded somewhat. Since our Cisco concentrator is WAY out of warrany and of course has no existing support contract on it, we are basically done. So The question has come up...what to do about it. We don't have very many users that access the

RE: ..and now for something completely different..

2010-11-16 Thread David Lum
That makes sense, ServerB is an old Pentium III. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ..and now for something completely different.. ServerA was faster at answering than the Linksys router. The

RE: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Mike Gill
I've used this before: http://www.joeware.net/freetools/tools/cpau/index.htm Command line tool for starting process in alternate security context. Basically this is a runas replacement. Also allows you to create job files and encode the id, password, and command line in a file so it can be

Re: OT: Shoretel

2010-11-16 Thread Don Ely
LMAO On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Going way out on a limb here, but maybe: rich...@gmail.com *From:* Jonathan Bible [mailto:jtbi...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:34 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:*

Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Cameron
What about the old DOS command (or something similar) bat2exe ? I'm guessing that it would do some sort of compile? On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Mike Gill lis...@canbyfoursquare.comwrote: I’ve used this before: http://www.joeware.net/freetools/tools/cpau/index.htm *Command line tool

Re: VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Cameron cameron.orl...@gmail.com wrote: We don't have very many users that access the company via VPN (about 30 all told) and usually no more than 5 at a time. We use OpenVPN. It's been maintenance-free once we got it working. Pros: Secure; stable; free;

Re: VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Jonathan Link
The SSL-VPN's from Sonicwall are nice. We have a 2000, and haven't had a lick of trouble with it. On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Cameron cameron.orl...@gmail.com wrote: Good afternoon all! Well, the VPN issue has expanded somewhat. Since our Cisco concentrator is WAY out of warrany and

Re: VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Cameron
I was reading about the Sonicwall SSL-VPN'show's their support? On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote: The SSL-VPN's from Sonicwall are nice. We have a 2000, and haven't had a lick of trouble with it. On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Cameron

Re: VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Bill Humphries
+1 We use these at multiple clients and are happy with them. The client supports windows, macs and linux clients...except for 64 bit linux clients. Jonathan Link wrote: The SSL-VPN's from Sonicwall are nice. We have a 2000, and haven't had a lick of trouble with it. On Tue, Nov 16,

RE: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread David Lum
I actually tried that, but when PSSHUTDOWN is called it opens its own window. From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output What about the old DOS command (or something similar) bat2exe ?

Re: VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Jonathan Link
Support from the company? Don't know haven't needed any. Getting updates is fairly painless, download from Sonicwall's site. It's an update only if security vulnerability or comatibility dictates it type of requirement. In all honesty, once I got the device setup, I decided to forego annual

RE: VPN explored

2010-11-16 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I use OpenVPN and as Ben said, its rock solid. If you insist on paying, the smallest ASA would prolly work just fine... ~500.00 jlc From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: VPN explored Good afternoon all!

Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Cameron
Ok...totally off the wall thinking here... What about using a password that is made up of ALT characters? Giving a symbol looking passwordthat would give most people a seizure trying to figure out. On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:38 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: I actually tried

Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt Buff
Perhaps an alternative? http://www.freevbcode.com/ShowCode.asp?ID=7693 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:04, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: Anyone know how to hide PSSHUTDOWN output? I have a .CMD file that calls it and sends username and password that  I don’t want the person who invokes it to

Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread Anders Blomgren
Even with redirecting STDERR as well? e.g. psshutdown blabla NUL 21 Otherwise your best bet would be a vbscript that uses wshShell and the Run method. -Anders On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:04 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: Anyone know how to hide PSSHUTDOWN output? I have a .CMD file

RE: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output

2010-11-16 Thread David Lum
Hmm...haven't tried that... From: Anders Blomgren [mailto:chanks...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Hide PSSHUTDOWN output Even with redirecting STDERR as well? e.g. psshutdown blabla NUL 21 Otherwise your best bet would be a vbscript

Re: A real puzzler...

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt Buff
Oh good grief... So, I'm away from the office in a VMWare class, and find that the part time IT guy in the office did a test, and it seems to confirm that the DC is holding onto 192.168.61.30. He pinged the address from his box, checked his arp table, and the MAC address for the DC shows. He

Re: A real puzzler...

2010-11-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: So, I'm away from the office in a VMWare class, and find that the part time IT guy in the office did a test, and it seems to confirm that the DC is holding onto 192.168.61.30. Well, that narrows it down quite a bit, which

Re: A real puzzler...

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt Buff
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 16:17, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: So, I'm away from the office in a VMWare class, and find that the part time IT guy in the office did a test, and it seems to confirm that the DC is holding

RE: Add/Remove programs showing blank on Windows 2003 SP2 Server

2010-11-16 Thread Haritwal, Dhiraj
Thanks, Carl. This also already checked but didn't find any string value ends with -1 in DisplayIcon key. Seems to be something wrong with Rundll32.exe Ideally whenever we run appwiz.cpl, rundll32.exe should auto run once closed appwiz, rundll32.exe should auto close. Now here rundll32.exe is

Re: Citrix Licensing indestructible user account

2010-11-16 Thread James Rankin
Cool, nice to know my problems (and their solutions) are officially documented! On 16 November 2010 15:40, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote: I turned this into an article for you: http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=16700 Thanks Carl Webster Citrix Technology Professional