HELP
I have been asked to find some Free blogging software we can run in
house on out intranet server
The server is running windows 2000 and Iis
Can anyone recommend anything
Thanks
Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel: 01200 452329
Fax: 01200 452201
Web:
Just wanted to let you guys know about a phishing email I just received. It
claimed to be from the government, and something about an electronic tax
payment failling... Not sure what it was, but something made me curious
(apart from the fact that none of the addressees exist grin) so I took a
Folks,
I am moving my network from point to point to MVLS, Metro Ethernet. My ISP
allows for two VLANs in this setup: one for real-time traffic, and one for
other non-essential traffic. Creating the VLANs is no issue, but I'm not sure
about how to apply certain traffic type to a particular
WordPress comes to mind.
Haven't used it myself
ymmv
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
wrote:
HELP
I have been asked to find some Free blogging software we can run in
house on out intranet server
The server is running windows 2000 and Iis
Can
http://www.wikimatrix.org/wizard.php
Probably either screwturn or foswiki, but work through the wizard and
see what pops up.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 02:25, Nigel Parker
nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk wrote:
HELP
I have been asked to find some Free blogging software we can run in
house on out
There's also a recent Facebook fake/phish email, verbiage along the lines of
you have notifications pending, but all the links actually go to
http:...//tabletsbargainsrxworld...net/
I added extra periods as I haven't been to the site with my sandbox yet to
see if it's a malware loader. But the
I think Windows Server 2000 is going to restrict you a bit :)
dasBlog and BlogEngine.NET are pretty popular .NET blog based engines, but they
require .NET v2, which IIRC doesn't run on Windows 2000...
Cheers
Ken
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:rene.deh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010
My dearest friends,
I have of much apologizing to do to the group of you. I am been receiving
phishing and the scam emails on almost all days and I have been regretful in
not posting of them to this group as a needed warning. I will flagellate
myself daily until I am remembering to post all of
Thanks Amit! I find Security through ad nauseum is an excellent
stance.
-sc
From: Amit Hanji [mailto:amit.ha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Fake tax email
My dearest friends,
I have of much apologizing to do to the
Post is full of win :-)
From: Amit Hanji [mailto:amit.ha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 9:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Fake tax email
My dearest friends,
I have of much apologizing to do to the group of you. I am been receiving
phishing and the scam emails on
Just remember, though. No good deed goes unpunished. Some might consider
your efforts ill-advised. I'm not one of them. I find your dilligence in
this matter most refreshing. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to
subscribe to your newsletter.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Amit
You may wanna start with WSS 3.0 and from there check into dotnetnuke. I'm a
big fan of Wordpress but you'd need to get MySQL, php, and probably apache
installed in addition to a few smaller apps. You can use IIS but I haven't
configured it to run on IIS 5. Upgrade that server to W2K3 and you save
Well I'll forgive you this one time Amit, especially in light of your much
sought after honor of being nominated for Who's Who!
- WJR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 07:42, Amit Hanji amit.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
My dearest friends,
I have of much apologizing to do to the group of you. I am been
Greetings!
In my morning scan of assorted news sites, I see a report in the PC
Magazine Security Watch page that there is a piece of MBR ransomware
going around.
The report goes on to say that the password to restore things (for which
ransom is demanded is aaciip.
We currently have a couple of identical Windows Server 2003 R2 (Std x64
Edition SP2) running Terminal Services for a customer. Due to the
overall and very sudden increase in the customer user base we are now
finding we want to potentially use the servers in a cluster
environment to help cope with
We're practicing upgrading our AD 2003 to 2008. We have a parent-child
domain structure. We have a VM DC in each domain. So I made copies of
one of each, and separated them onto an isolated subnet. Then I seized
all the FSMO roles.
All that is pretty much what I would do in a D/R situation. And
Let me get out my microscope to read your e-mail!
http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2004/11/29/how-to-confi
gure-windows-network-load-balancing-for-pure-terminal-server-environments.as
px
Or better yet, http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=terminal+server+2003+nlb and your
first
Yeah, you're going to have to do it manually, NTDSUTIL. Once you do
this 2-3 times, it becomes second nature and isn't very time consuming.
Just be careful and read your commands before entering them.
:)
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431
Is storage shared between the two servers? Two-node cluster maybe but quorum
and shared storage are among the initial cluster requirements.
On Dec 1, 2010 9:20 AM, Robert Jackson r...@walkermartyn.co.uk wrote:
We currently have a couple of identical Windows Server 2003 R2 (Std x64
Edition SP2)
On 12/1/2010 9:44 AM, Don Guyer wrote:
Yeah, you're going to have to do it manually, NTDSUTIL. Once you do
this 2-3 times, it becomes second nature and isn't very time consuming.
Just be careful and read your commands before entering them.
Heh.
Actually ... I found that if you go into
I think part of the final steps include removing the entries from within AD
but this is usually done after you perform the metadata cleanup vis
ntdsutil.
On Dec 1, 2010 9:32 AM, Mike Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
We're practicing upgrading our AD 2003 to 2008. We have a parent-child
domain
Interesting, never tried that, will have to.
Kudos,
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Leone
My eyes!!
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 6:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB
We currently have a couple of identical Windows Server 2003 R2 (Std x64
Edition SP2) running Terminal Services
Thanks for the heads up on this one.. I am sure there is going to be a
lot of drive-by attacks, ransomware, and remember the malicious
Egreetings cards from folks you never heard of in your life, that are
probably trapped with malware or lead/redirect you to malware sites.
I have been seeing
On 12/1/2010 9:59 AM, Don Guyer wrote:
Interesting, never tried that, will have to.
Yeah, I had never done it this way, either. But afterward, when I went
into NTDSUTIL and went to do the metadata cleanup, all of the servers
were already gone from all the sites.
Who knew? :-)
Kudos,
Don
Good point. Hadn't thought about any kind of My Documents redirection
(which is what is used currently but located on the local server - so
not shared storage at the moment).
From: MarvinC [mailto:marv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday 01 December 2010 14:48
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Are they bleedingJ
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday 01 December 2010 15:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB
My eyes!!
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01,
Hmm... I noticed a message on Facebook yesterday from my nephew about
receiving notifications from Facebook that he's got notifications waiting,
but never able to see any. Hope he's not getting this stuff. I better pop
over there and let him know.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff
I think you should contact your ISP and ask them how they intend this dual
vlan is supposed to be setup. I've never heard of it before, perhaps they want
you to filter traffic at your router? Each vlan they provide is for a different
subnet/gateway, I presume? Do they offer you two physical
NT crew,
Due to some family members that can't be with us on Christmas morning, I'd like
to setup a web cam with audio capabilities so they can view my youngn's
excitement on Christmas morning. What camera would you recommend for this?
I'm willing to pay for a decent solution but I don't want
Those new Microsoft HD webcams are awesomehowever if you already have
some type of handycam with firewire, they work fine too.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote:
NT crew,
Due to some family members that can’t be with us on Christmas morning, I’d
Folder Redirection and Home Folders are a must in a TS/Ctx environment.
Some kind of profile mgmt. is necessary also.
Webster
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB
Good point. Hadn't thought about any kind of My
No, we are having to use a microscope to read your font size. I think your
font size choice is measured in microns instead of points.
Webster
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB
Are they bleedingJ
From: Martin
We use Logitech's QuckCam 9000 for video web conferences between branches
and the quality is more than adequate.
*http://preview.tinyurl.com/33937dd*
*
*
Roger Wright
___
Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.
Another great page, including ways to automate and do unattended
removals, including using VBscrips, LDIFDE, etc:
http://www.msresource.net/knowledge_base/articles/how_to:_remove_domains_and_domain_controllers.html
I'll have to remember to try that dnscmd /recorddelete next time, to
clean up
For the last several years, I’ve been using the A4Tech Live Messenger Webcam
and Ustream.TV to Webcast charity events. You can just share a URL to the
Ustream site and anyone can view the video/audio feed for as long as you
want to broadcast.
I see Amazon has this camera for around $20
why is it that it won't use at least half of the 10.37 Mbps upload from
fios? Colo is 66.08 Mbps down 57.34 Mbps upload and FIOS is down 36.5 Mbps
10.37 Mbps upload. Backups since last night (started at 3:30 am) using
acronis, via FTP (using filiezila server) at about 2.2 Mbps max I saw is
+1 - about 20 of these in deployment. Quality is great - especially with
Skype.
It is one of the approved high quality cameras and will let you jack
up the quality a notch.
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
What is the fastest you can transfer using FTP within your own subnet ?
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:50 PM
W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine?
Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I
thought you could use telnet..but using it to check DNS when I type TELNET
DNSSERVER 53 I get could not open port, yet DNS resolution works. If I do the
You realize TCP 53 and UDP 53 perform two different tasks right?
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine?
Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I
thought you could
Try transferring a large set of files through copy. What's the throughput on
that? Need to figure out if it's Acronis limiting it, or network.
justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.com 12/1/2010 9:49 AM
why is it that it won't use at least half of the 10.37 Mbps upload from
fios? Colo is 66.08
Oh hey...now that you mention it..
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Port testing
You realize TCP 53 and UDP 53 perform two different tasks right?
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Lum
There is actually a pretty cool vbs script that presents a GUI you can get from
PSS (metacleaner.vbs)
-Original Message-
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 6:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Best way of removing
I would use TCPVIEW, Wireshark and NMAP (Especially NMAP!)
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:06 PM
To:
I am testing adding a Legal Notice and Caption Language to my Windows
2008 and Windows 2008 R2 systems via Local Group Policy and when I log
in via console ( in VMware via Vcenter) it doesn't prompt me
accordingly, like it does on my Windows 2000 and Windows 2003/R2
systems.
I have added it
I added them direct to the registry in HKLM\Software\MS\Windows
NT\Winlogon\LegalNoticeCaption and Text, and they work fine on 2008 R2
never tried the GPO route
On 1 December 2010 18:49, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
I am testing adding a Legal Notice and Caption Language to my
I'd use Microsoft's portqry or nmap.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:06 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine?
Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I
thought you could use telnet..but using it to
maybe Dotnetnuke can do the trick.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Nigel Parker
nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk wrote:
HELP
I have been asked to find some Free blogging software we can run in
house on out intranet server
The server is running windows 2000 and Iis
Can anyone recommend anything
Thanks, I just ended up doing it accordingly, and it worked fine, now I
got to export them into my other Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 2008
systems.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
I would suggest getting rid of Windows 2000 as the starting point.
Microsoft Web Platform Installer can then be used to get a number of
different possibilities depending on what you want. If you are just
'blogging', then Wordpress is the hands down winner and you can even use th
eMS write tool
Got a call from a user across town who was having trouble with sounds on his
PC, so I knew there was an extra set of speakers at his building and told
him to try those. 10 minutes later, he calls me back saying those don't work
either, so I log into his computer using VNC so I can see what he's
That's crazy! Can't stand those guys...
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Got a call from a user across town who was having trouble with sounds on
his PC, so I knew there was an extra set of speakers at his building and
told him to try those. 10
Ahh I have not attempted on my own subnet, I will try that...
thanks
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote:
Try transferring a large set of files through copy. What's the throughput
on that? Need to figure out if it's Acronis limiting it, or network.
Yeah, but at least they make US look smart!
Roger Wright
___
Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
That's crazy! Can't stand those
Nahh...no big deal. I just thought it was kinda funny how it was something
that easy. :-)
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stupid User Tricks
That's crazy! Can't stand those guys...
On Wed, Dec 1,
Blows my mind sometime...i like that new carpet on your sig by the way. hey
John, have you found your SAN yet?
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Nahh...no big deal. I just thought it was kinda funny how it was something
that easy. :-)
From:
I can top that. Boss's wife has a net book she regularly moves around the
house. Calls me one day with no sound, so I remote into the machine and it's
not muted. Since I can't see the machine, I couldn't tell that she had
plugged a spare charger into the speaker port on the netbook. Good thing she
I can hear it coming:
My users are so stupid!
How stupid are they?
Roger Wright
___
Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Lee Douglas lee.doug...@gmail.com wrote:
Overheard on a helpdesk after a tech gets off the phone with a user...
My job would be so much easier it it weren't for the users.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
I can hear it coming:
My users are so stupid!
How stupid are they?
Well, probably. I've got a gentleman's agreement with some folks out of
Atlanta to use them for our SAN solution. Unfortunately, it's most likely
going to be *at least* middle of 2011 before we can do it. Have to wait for
the economy to pick up and orders to come back to normal.
As for the
So I get a call one day, with a manager bitching me out because none of the
systems at his location are working. They can't connect to our ERP system,
their files, print, etc. I'm trying to troubleshoot the problem and ask him
to reboot the Netscreen because I can't connect to it either. He asks
Like Joe's implying (at least I think that may be what he's getting at),
the slowness could be due to the file systems on the servers you're
going to and from.
From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Actually I am reno'ing my basement (actually new house, so not actually
renovating). I need good carpet. That stuff looks good!
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:21 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Well, probably. I've got a gentleman's agreement with some folks out of
Atlanta to
Ouch! That really is an ID10T error. :-)
From: leedoug...@pellis.com [mailto:leedoug...@pellis.com] On Behalf Of Lee
Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 3:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stupid User Tricks
I can top that. Boss's wife has a net book she regularly moves
ROFL! Good thing I wasn't drinking or eating anything... it would have ended up
on my monitor! ;-)
From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 3:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stupid User Tricks
Overheard on a helpdesk after a tech gets
You tried putting carriage returns in them yet? :-) There's probably a much
easier way of doing it, but I am still editing the binary data to get them
in :-0
On 1 December 2010 19:12, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Thanks, I just ended up doing it accordingly, and it worked fine, now
Great! :-) We'd love to have your business... If you'll email me *off-list*
with your contact info, I'll put you in touch with our sales rep for your
area. :-)
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 3:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stupid
For a system to talk to Active Directory LDAP does it need both UDP and TCP
ports open, or just TCP?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017
I did find a separate article that explains Kerberos uses UDP port 88 unless
the packet is to big then it goes to TCP, but I am unable to get further
Have you checked Netstat/TCPView?
I'm pretty sure that it's TCP only, but that's easy enough to confirm.
...
Okay, so I took a moment to check (LDAP UDP) and came up with the following:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc717362(PROT.13).aspx
Belated Congratulations to mom and dad. Glad everyone is doing well. Take lots
of pictures cause they are going to grow so fast.
Don K
From: Tony Patton apco...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed, November 24,
Looks to be TCP.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/179442
- WJR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 14:43, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
For a system to talk to Active Directory LDAP does it need both UDP and TCP
ports open, or just TCP?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017
I did find a
Seriously?!?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:55:37
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
Good to know. That actually explains some odd behaviours I've seen.
- WJR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 14:50, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you checked Netstat/TCPView?
I'm pretty sure that it's TCP only, but that's easy enough to confirm.
...
Okay, so I took a moment to
No, I can't read today. I'm not really having a good day. I'll STFU now.
- WJR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 14:57, -sc likes it when we configure our display
name don@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously?!?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
--
*From: * William
Actually my Local GPO worked finally. It seems that the import doesn't
work by clicking on the reg file, basically says something is wrong with
it.
But I actually loaded it from another X64 R2 system accordingly.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
I'll throw this out since I've had a couple questions about our carpet. we
sell carpet world-wide. J If any of you are interested in our carpet, you
can email me **off-list** and I can put you in touch with a sales rep or
just go to our website and fill out the form and we'll have someone get
RPC normally uses random ports above 1024 for specific RPC communications
Since OP was talking about 2008 R2 it's noteworthy that In 2K8 above the RPC
range (AKA RPC randomly allocated high TCP ports) is from 49152-65535, not
1024-65535
From: VIPCS [mailto:vi...@stny.rr.com]
Sent: Monday,
Yep that much I knew, but thanks for clarifying here. A registry entry will
allow you to use a narrow range for high ports:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154596
Dave
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2008
Uhh..that link makes it look like both:
Client Port Server Port Service
1024-65535/TCP/UDP 389/TCP/UDPLDAP
Unless there's something in the text I'm missing?
Dave
From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010
Oh BTW - the recommendation, if TMG/ISA/UAG aren't possible (or other layer-7
firewall), is simply to open 443 inside.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:29 PM
No you aren't missing anything, I just scanned real quick saw the LDAP SSL
and ran with it like the retard I am. Go with what's written, not my poor
ability to scan read.
- WJR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 15:30, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Uhh..that link makes it look like both:
Client
Jeez... Way to Buff your way through...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:38:11
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
Conveniently, 443 is the only open port in the firewall between the server and
the Internet. It's the ports between it and the DC's I need to open, and from
what I've read last couple of days is I need for a machine to be able to
authenticate with a DC:
TCP/UDP port 88 (Kerberos)
TCP port 135
Awesome! Thanks John...
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
I’ll throw this out since I’ve had a couple questions about our carpet…
we sell carpet world-wide. J If any of you are interested in our carpet,
you can email me **off-list** and I can
Why TCP 53 for my edification?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: David Lum david@nwea.org
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:47:07
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
have you got a link to your website John? BTW, there are discounts
available am I right?
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Great! :-) We'd love to have your business... If you'll email me *off-list*
with your contact info, I'll put you in touch
Because DNS uses port 53?
From: -sc likes it when we configure our display name [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2008 R2 RDS (was Terminal Server)in DMZ to 2K3 DC in LAN
Why TCP 53 for my edification?
Sent from my
www.blueridgecarpet.com :-) And I have nothing to do with the pricing...
that's between you and the sales rep. :-)
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stupid User Tricks
have you got a link to your
Ouch.
-sc
From: -sc likes it when we configure our display name
[mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AD LDAP port 389 just TCP
Jeez... Way to Buff your way through...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Ok, so let me ask you this, what specifically is TCP 53 used for? I'm probably
missing the boat here since I'm not sure if we are talking about running DNS on
a terminal server...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: David Lum david@nwea.org
Date: Wed,
All,
I'm at XP SP3 plus patches, and am running FF 3.6.12.
After closing and reopening FF today, I can no longer auth against my
intranet sites - at all.
Before, I set up network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris and
network.ntlm.send-lm-response, and had passthrough auth working just
fine.
I think Michael is saying to put the RD Gateway box on the internal network and
just open up 443 to it from the outside.
When I put an RD Gateway in I tend to recall reading that solution on a
Microsoft site somewhere. We have a TMG (ISA at the time) so chose that path.
Pretty much any
Last job that I had, and Cameron can vouch for this incident because he's
the one who took the call, user calls saying the monitor is broken and won't
work. I can't remote in and fix that so I walk over. I check his office for
the obvious, then realize he hasn't turned his monitor on. I push the
Does IE work?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2010 8:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firefox behaving strangely...
All,
I'm at XP SP3 plus patches, and am running FF 3.6.12.
After closing and reopening FF today, I
I'm talking about the RDS server finding (not being) a DNS server - the RDS
(formerly Terminal Server) gateway has to resolve machine names and find a DC
somehow doesn't it? I guess an alternate would be to maintain a HOSTS file
right?
Dave
From: -sc likes it when we configure our display
BUT, if I say John is my listserv buddy, he/she might?
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
www.blueridgecarpet.com :-) And I have nothing to do with the pricing...
that's between you and the sales rep. :-)
From: Steve Ens
Just stick the thing on the inside, open up 443 to it and the rest of this pain
will go away.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2010 8:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2008 R2 RDS (was Terminal Server)in DMZ to 2K3 DC in LAN
I'm talking about
DNS resolvers use TCP 53 when the response won't fit in a single UDP
datagram.
It's very common with the increased use of DNSSEC.
On 12/1/2010 4:00 PM, -sc likes it when we configure our display name wrote:
Ok, so let me ask you this, what specifically is TCP 53 used for? I'm
probably missing
Yup. No problem with that at all. It's my current workaround...
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 14:04, James Hill james.h...@superamart.com.au wrote:
Does IE work?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2010 8:01 AM
To: NT System Admin
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
