I agree with Andrew … I’ve been configuring the Juniper ‘screens for years
now, including the 5GT and SSG 5 that replaced it.
Granted, the Juniper is very different from a Cisco PIX/ASA firewall, and
different from Checkpoint.
I wonder if extensive knowledge of some other brand of firewall is
All of these vendors have a methodology that you have to get used to so you
can see things as they see them.
Unfortunately, many of them are hiring junior support people, so it's not
surprising (although quite annoying) that there's some slow going there...
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile)
It appears that this discussion is no longer germane to your original post.
At the very least you're not finding agreement with your point of view.
In your OP you said you were being forced to accept Skype. It's doubtful
that any security concerns you raise will cause management to change their
*I submit, however, that another animal is a powerful and
relevant metaphor here - the black swan.*
Metaphors are nice, but we have limited time to focus on them to the
distraction of actually *doing* things.
Fact: The internet is a rough and tumble environment, with lots of threats
about, and
Do you **currently** have any visibility into SSL traffic in your
environment?
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
True, but...
As I'll keep
*Once he's made up my mind, it is going to happen, regardless of any
subordinate's[1] wishes.
*
Especially if they cannot be articulated in a useful manner.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at
This is tangential, but if you ever do need to record something from your PC
(audio or video) and you can't (such as in the case of capturing a streaming
vid), there is only one tool I've found capable - Total Recorder.
http://www.totalrecorder.com/
This is actually an amazingly well made
Well I think part of the frustration is that appears that to create a
simple port forward that sends all incoming traffic on a specific port
to an internal server (for example) requires 17 different policies and
interfaces and zones. I'm exaggerating a bit, yes, but the Juniper
seems very
For a nice free SME firewall, I might look at Smoothwall express
http://www.smoothwall.org/
Alex
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:b...@rolandschorr.com]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 12:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Small/Mid Firewall?
Well I think part of the frustration is that
Thanks Alex, we're waist deep in trying to figure out the
already-purchased Juniper though so I don't really have the resources to
devote to learning yet another solution.
Maybe for the next one.
Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
__
Roland
I love both roaming profiles and folder redirection, but have been burned by
offline files in the past (Windows 2000 server and pro) and just don't want
to go there again even though improvements have been made!
We like the Keep It Simple principal, we redirect the My Documents folder to
the
Thanks, Alex
I'm going to evaluate Total Recorder. The features look good, as does the
licensing!
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Alex Eckelberry al...@sunbelt-software.com
wrote:
I'll tell you what. I'll become your Juniper expert and open vast new
horizons for your practice. I went to grad. school in AZ, so I don't really
want to live in Flagstaff. I spent 8 years in LA after grad school, so
that's out too. Hey, look what's left. Honolulu!
I'm in!
On Fri, Dec 31,
I prefer to use the same name as the Rapid Transit District buses that go
through the bad areas of Los Angeles:
*RTD*: *Rough, Tough, and Dangerous*
--
ME2
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Fact: The internet is a rough and tumble environment, with
That is what all the girls back in high school used to tell me! blush
Webster
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Small/Mid Firewall?
You are the man, Webster! :)
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Especially when they needed help with citrix issues :-)
Typed frustratingly slowly on my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:32:18
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System
Buddy of mine just called me frantic that he bought 3 of these with the
Injectors but apparently it needs a controller to work properly. He emailed me
the PDF of the setup and these apparently do not work without a controller.
Can anyone confirm this? I don't want him to send them back and
Unfortunately, Citrix's first product (which I used) didn't come out until
15 years after I was out of HS. IBM PC was 6 years after HS. First
handheld calculators (6 functions IIRC) came out my sr. yr. and only cost
$295. I used a slide ruler (with the uber cool slide on belt attachment)
all
So, my son has two Xbox 360s and two TVs in his Man Cave. His friends bring
their hard drives over and they play COD on Xbox Live. I have a business
cable connection with 13 public IPs available. I use a Cisco ASA for firewall
and VPN to work.
I have set public addresses via NAT to each
Bob if I had to guess the issue is that they are looping through the router. As
a repro, do this:
NAT your computer on IP 1. NAT something (like IIS) on IP2. Try to connect to
http://IP2 from computer 2.
IIRC there is a way around this but I honestly can't remember the solution.
It's been
Looks like these are lightweight models which do require a controller...
•The access point can only communicate with Cisco wireless LAN controllers,
such as 2100, 4400, and 5500 series controllers.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/3500/quick/guide/ap3500getstart.html
On
FYI every single firewall vendor has a different name for the feature
you mention.
Cisco calls it NAT hairpin.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/1003238
On 12/31/2010 5:22 PM, Brian Desmond wrote:
*Bob if I had to guess the issue is that they are looping through the
router. As a repro,
It was Jeffrey's understanding that a server file quota applies to ALL files
owned by a user on that server, not whether they are in a home folder or a
roaming profile folder.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey and Mary Jane Harris
VIPCS
_
From: Stephen Wimberly
Thx, what I pretty much thought after getting home and reading through some of
the docs. Man was he peeved when I told him. Don't feel too bad, if you go
buying things you don't understand and make promises you cant keep, well you
will call someone who knows better next time.
Thx for the
24 matches
Mail list logo
