I am a atractive blonde, eager to meet an interesting man for some virtual
chatting by email or Skype, or dates in reality!
I have registered my profile at:
MSN: bravepi...@hotmail.com
AIM: ardelleleona
Yahoo: lovelyhardd
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Obviously a blonde who doesn't use spell check
(I am a atractive blonde, eager to)
And dates in reality, could that be Reality Ohio?
-Original Message-
From: er...@mailfrom.com [mailto:er...@mailfrom.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 7:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: from
She apparently likes groups :-)
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Brumbaugh, Luke luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu Jun 02 07:36:03 2011
Subject: RE:
I just did ForestPrep/DomainPrep/RODCPrep a few days ago and it will be a while
before I start deploying Server 2008 R2 DCs.
BTW, You don't need to extend the schema for photos - 2003 level has the
attribute you need: thumbnailPhoto
Ken Cornetet 812.482.8499
To err is human - to moo, bovine.
Network World recently gave a good review of http://www.maas360.com/
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.comwrote:
There seems to be a quite a market for mobile device security growing
these days!
I’m curious what you guys are looking at in the market. What
We virtualize EVERYTHING that can run virtual regardless. The only things we
have that aren't virtual is our big SAP app and DB servers, and when the next
version of ESX comes out with more memory and CPUs per virtual, we are going
after some of them.
This used to cause no end of whining from
Are you in southern Indiana?
On Jun 2, 2011 8:34 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
We virtualize EVERYTHING that can run virtual regardless. The only things
we have that aren't virtual is our big SAP app and DB servers, and when the
next version of ESX comes out with more memory
Thanks for the replies. I may not have to move this thing after all. The
host server was shutting down and restarting a few times a day causing havoc
with our accounting app. I'm not positive yet but it may be happening due to
a bad power strip and not the server itself. The server is a brand new.
This brings up a question - do bigger orgs have a person who is effectively a
mobile device specialist? Basically a Service Desk guy who really handles
nothing but any mobile device that isn't a typical Win laptop or desktop?
David Lum
Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Mobile
Most of my customers are large enough to have a mobility team. But we are
talking thousands of mobile devices of all kinds, shapes, sizes,
functionality, brands, vendors, etc. Strange that when medical personnel
(i.e. doctors) are involved, they can get just about any device they want.
+1.
We are about 80-90% VM'd for our environment, and they are configured
practically identically to our physical boxen.
-sc
.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, we treat VMs very similarly to physical systems for the most part...
About 20%
And I take it you have all these mobile devices running their applications
using Citrix Receiver? :-)
[Slight hijack alert] Actually I've been trying to do a lot of integration
of Blackberries, Ipads, etc. using the Citrix Receiver but I'm struggling to
find any good documentation on getting them
Anyone have any ideas?
From: Jay Dale [jd...@unetek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RDP through ISA Array
Hey all,
I have a client who is using 2 ISA 2006 servers in an array. ISA 1 is for the
internal clients
Of course. Next upgrade to Receiver will be nice.
Current versions of Receiver clients should work with a regular Web
Interface site. Prior versions required a PNAgent/XenApp Services Site. I
know there are many issues with Access Gateway 5.x and Receivers especially
for iOS, Android and
Hey! Get off my thread! :-)
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 7:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Securing Mobile Devices
And I take it you have all these mobile devices running their applications
using Citrix Receiver? :-)
Depends – do you owe me money, or do I owe you money?
Yes.
Ken Cornetet 812.482.8499
To err is human - to moo, bovine.
From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VM's in AD
Are you in southern Indiana?
On Jun
Thanks. The attribute has been there since 2000, but for Outlook 2010 to use
it there is a new attribute that has to be in place and extending the schema to
2008 creates it.
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Webster,
MD/PHd=GOD
How you going to tell MD/PHD's who are gods, no?
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June
Simple: No
Alternately: If you want 'yes' it will cost you this much
Dave
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Securing Mobile Devices
Webster,
MD/PHd=GOD
How you going to tell MD/PHD's who are gods,
Well, as a patient who recently recieved poor care, you fill in the hospital
customer servey and cc your insurance company the three page letter where
you explain you will be switching providers because of it.
As an IT guy, you advertise and promote with a strong IT department head
behind you and
Don't leave Athena out.
http://www.odysseysoftware.com/MDMPRODUCTS/AthenaforMobileDeviceManagement.a
spx
Best of the breed, IMO.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Subject: RE: Securing Mobile Devices
This brings up a question - do bigger orgs have a person who is
Grin Dave, I love that additude, it doesn't fly at a hospital or in
bigger healthcare environments.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
So here's what I did:
I was changing the IP address of both parent and child DCs to 172.16.7.xx.
1. Create a new subnet in SITES AND SERVICES for 172.16.7.x
2. Create a REVERSE ZONE in *each* DNS (parent and child) for 172.16.7.x
3. Change IP address the NIC in parent DC
1. Be sure to
The customers I am working for, it is the doctors who are the business
decision makers or have a majority on the committees who make the decisions.
But, for me, the mobility stuff is handled by a different part of IT than I
work in. So far Martin, I have no idea what they use for mgmt but I do
Good job. :)It's one of the easier changes to make...
Did you change DHCP (if used)?
*ASB *(Professional Bio http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
*Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...
*
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Mike Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/2/2011 11:53 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
Good job. :)It's one of the easier changes to make...
It is, if you remember to reboot first. :-) I didn't reboot yesterday
after the IP change, which is what caused my DNS so much grief ...
that's why I restored them from before the change, and
Does it have its own rule to allow this access externally?
you said internal cannot RDP to WAN, is this a separate rule? check this
rule to make sure it is still correct.
-
Who'd you rather be, the Beatles or the Rolling Stones?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 06:52, Jay Dale
What's your wait state cache at, John?
John Leto jo...@colonialsavings.com 6/1/2011 12:45 PM
We run a production MS SQL DB at just over 300gb on a VM just fine. The key is
making sure that you have the proper hardware.
We've ran this for over a year just fine.
-Original Message-
From:
Not surprising :)
I should have added a third one: and if you want yes but don't want to pay, it
will cost you this much
Dave
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Securing Mobile Devices
Grin Dave, I
So are your physical servers physically all physical? Because they can't
be virtually all physical, can they?
Waitwhat?!
Never mind, back to your regularly scheduled programming..
J
Don Guyer
Windows Systems Engineer
RIM Operations Engineering Distributed - A Team,
I think you may virtually have a point.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Guyer, Don don.gu...@fiserv.com wrote:
So are your physical servers physically all physical? Because they can’t be
virtually all physical, can they?
Wait……..what?!
Never mind, back to your regularly scheduled
I have my virtual copy of my AD structure just about all ready to go.
The DCs are on an isolated vSwitch on VMware ESX 4.1. The last step is
to set up time sync, I think.
According to
Will Kill.
Stu
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 7:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: from Cornelia
She apparently likes groups :-)
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
There is currently a rule to allow RDP from the outside to the inside to a
specific IP. I tried creating a rule that would allow outbound RDP, but that
didn't help.
Jay Dale
Senior Systems Administrator
P:281-574-2414
From: S Powell [mailto:powe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011
* Dramatic Overhaul of Windows GUI: Video
At a press event in Taipei this week, Redmond showed the next version of
Windows, unveiling a dramatically overhauled tiles-based interface that
they hope will be competitive in the tablet world. Microsoft marketing
people must have gotten their
does that rule allow inside to that IP?
--the TS you are trying to reach is outside on the WAN? ... you'd need a
rule inside to that IP as well...
-
Who'd you rather be, the Beatles or the Rolling Stones?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:44, Jay Dale jd...@unetek.com wrote:
There
Interesting video. Thanks for the link, Stu.
Stu Sjouwerman s...@sunbelt-software.com 6/2/2011 12:45 PM
* Dramatic Overhaul of Windows GUI: Video
At a press event in Taipei this week, Redmond showed the next version of
Windows, unveiling a dramatically overhauled tiles-based interface
No, the TS is inside the network behind the firewall. The existing rule
forwards RDP to that server from outside connections. The outside connections
work fine. They're trying to work with the interface in house and they're
being blocked (I guess) from RDP going outbound and then back
Possibly set the rule on the ISA server to listen on both the WAN and
the LAN NICs, and then also set the rule to allow traffic from both
internal and external networks, and then set up split DNS so that from
inside the LAN the URL resolves to the internal IP of the ISA server.
RIGHT that would make sense then. it would allow the outbound part on
the web traffic/ http rule, but block the boomerang.
try allowing the internal network on the RDP rule from the outside.
-
Who'd you rather be, the Beatles or the Rolling Stones?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at
Sorry, but since when is that strange? He/She that controls the purse
ALWAYS gets what they want.
At least until they commit a major boo-boo that costs the entire company
including themselves a lot of money as damages.
Jon
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, did that.
Not sure if I like it or not...
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 14:46, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
…one of the sites you have as a homepage gets a redesign and the first thing
you assume if your machine has been compromised..
ISC.SANS.ORG rolled out a redesigned look and I
Geeks do not like redesigns. Even if they are better.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, did that.
Not sure if I like it or not...
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 14:46, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
…one of the sites you have as a homepage gets a
Unless they did the redesign...
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Geeks do not like redesigns. Even if they are better.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, did that.
Not sure if I like it or not...
On Thu, Jun 2,
Hmm, looks familiar:
http://www.mosaicbytribune.com/
Not at sophisticated as what's in that video, but it sure looks inspired by.
--
Mike Gill
From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: *
Well true, then they get grumpy when anyone mentions anything about it
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Unless they did the redesign...
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Geeks do not like redesigns. Even if they
46 matches
Mail list logo
