Reset your IIS services. I have no idea why it is not honoring the 15 cache
setting but it seems like it doesn't and based upon how often I seem to see
this from different folks it doesn't honor it for most people.
From: Ben N [mailto:bennordlan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Never done a lot of work with ESXi - so can anyone tell me whether it
behaves in the same way as full-fat ESX, as in when a CPU or memory usage
goes over threshold, does the host/guest get a little yellow or red alert
on it in the VMWare client that indicates there's an issue? I have a client
Why not use Nagios to do the monitoring? It's free and will monitor for
just about anything and fire off emails when that threshold has been
exceeded over a period of time.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:12 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Never done a lot of work with ESXi - so can
Yeah, if we go VOIP we will be running a new CAT6 infrastructure just for
the phones and perform lots of testing before we cut over.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Jonathan Bible jtbi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am surprised no one has mentioned ShoreTel. It is supported on VMware
4.0. Just
Just for posterity, it looks like the only MS-recommended way of providing
resiliency in the session broker role is by using failover clustering.
On 8 November 2011 14:34, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Now you are over my head. J
** **
Regards,
** **
Michael B.
Just need something quick and dirty they already have for now. I recommended
nagios and SCE for perusal going forward
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
-Original Message-
From: Cameron cameron.orl...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:28:26
To: NT System Admin
We moved to Shoretel about 5 years ago as we were planning a new
corporate headquarters building and now have it deployed in 15
locations. The thing that most impressed me at the time with Shoretel
was that they were the only vendor we talked to that insisted on running
performance tests on our
ESXi acts the same as ESX, and the same alerts show up in the Virtual Center
client.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 8:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Quick query on alerting on ESXi
Never done a lot of work with ESXi - so can
We manage to run switch to phone to desktop without any problems at all
of our clients. We've never run cable just for phones. YMMV, but we
never have problems. Of course that assumes you are using a well
optimized codec for voice.
Bill
James Kerr wrote:
Yeah, if we go VOIP we will be
Anyone here using Shoretel for their phone system?
From what we've seen so far we're confident they're a good fit both in terms
of features and architecture, and (most importantly IMO) the client software
appears to be pretty good to use.
Any tales (on or off list) of how they have performed
Good to hear but we like cutting up walls and slinging cable in our filthy
ceiling plenums. ;-)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote:
We manage to run switch to phone to desktop without any problems at all of
our clients. We've never run cable just for
Works well for us - we have about 230 staff in HQ where it's
installed. The client is OK, but you need to be aware of a toxic
interaction with 64-bit MS Office, until they release their 64-bit
client. We've reverted to 32-bit Office because of that.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 07:14, Paul Hutchings
Can I get a bit more info on that please Kurt?
We do have many 64bit machines, but afaik only 1 64bit Office 2010 install -
which is mine.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 November 2011 15:33
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ShoreTel
+1 and most of the community colleges in VA are doing the same, so +22
-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT - Phone System In A Virtual Machine
We manage to run
Excellent, cheers!
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
-Original Message-
From: Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:11:03
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
When we terminate an employee, we archive their mailbox with ExMerge,
remove the mailbox from the account and assign their SMTP address to
their direct manager/supervisor, in addition to disabling their
account.
I'll bet that would eliminate this problem.
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 21:52, Ben
did you remove the device from their profile?
manage mobile device in EMC?
-
Oh, by the way, which one's Pink?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 05:27, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote:
Reset your IIS services. I have no idea why it is not honoring the 15
cache setting
Works much better for us since they added the ability to add pauses
when dialing.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Paul Hutchings
paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote:
Anyone here using Shoretel for their phone system?
From what we’ve seen so far we’re confident they’re a good fit both in terms
we don't do device management (yet). OWA/EAS is enabled on all accounts by
default. If they have an account, they can configure EAS on their phone. :)
-BenN
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:06 AM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote:
did you remove the device from their profile?
manage mobile device in
check EMC, you may not manage it, however you should still see it in there;
and be able to disable its connection, or even send a remote wipe to the
device.
-
Oh, by the way, which one's Pink?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 08:34, Ben N bennordlan...@gmail.com wrote:
we don't do
Shoretel is the the phone system we're using.
Pros:
* Very easy to use.
* Works great for windows environments.
* Has good support for mass deployment of analog phones (which some do not,
and we use a lot of).
* Can be used as your intercom (Using IP phones).
* Support has been good for
I've seen them at quite a few customers and ranked well in telephony
assessments.
If you're replacing your PBX and you're a Windows shop, I'd strongly suggest
looking at Lync.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Paul Hutchings
We're deploying Win7 x64, with no issues. However, using Office 64bit
(which requires Win7 x64) with the Shoretel Outlook integration turned
on screws Outlook badly. Switching to Office 32bit on Win7 x64 solved
the problems.
From what we can tell, the 64bit version of Office doesn't buy us
enough
Thanks Matt that helps and awful lot as it's the nitty gritty that tends to get
overlooked.
I would be interested in hearing of any licensing gotchas or things to be aware
of.
Which vendors switches are you using?
I'm not as involved in the financial side of this, I'm coming at this more from
Thanks Kurt, appreciate that. Tbh I don't even know why I have 64bit Office
installed, I think it falls into the seemed a good idea at the time category
so I'm not going to stress too much about that.
I would be interested to know if ShoreTel know of the issue and acknowledge it
as that's
Compared to the number of 32-bit Outlook add-ins available, the number of
64-bit Outlook add-ins is prolly in the 5% range.
32-bit add-ins are not compatible with 64-bit add-ins. A very low-level
Applications Programming Interface is different, necessitating that 64-bit
add-ins be specially
That might cause the guy with a wiped iPhone to rant on the interwebs :)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:40 AM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote:
check EMC, you may not manage it, however you should still see it in
there; and be able to disable its connection, or even send a remote wipe to
the
RSA? Given their recent history, I'd be asking them some very tough
questions, like 'Was your own product protecting you when you were
hacked?' and 'If not, why not, and if it was, well, WTF, over?'
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:34, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
We are looking at some SIEM
What is the goal?
On the low end, you are leaving out NetWrix, in the middle you are leaving out
ConfigMgr, and on the upper end you are leaving out various Quest solutions.
But it all depends on what you are trying to do.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
I would be interested in hearing of any licensing gotchas or things to be
aware of.
One license gotcha we just recently experienced: We have a user who uses
their Personal license. This gives the users an extension, mailbox, etc...
But this user wanted a feature which was only available to
For me, it's simply log aggregation and alerting. The bigger goal is a stuff
way out of my scope as it's being driven from our product side (I am
employee-facing, not product facing). I've been included on this project just
for my technical input and am much more a passenger than a driver on
System Center Operations Manager with Audit Collection Services can do all
this and more, if I am getting the gist of your requirements correctly
On 9 November 2011 18:54, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
For me, it’s simply log aggregation and alerting. The bigger goal is a
stuff way out
Aye aye. I misunderstood
goes back to work now
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SIEM solutions
For me, it's
You can configure email alerts under the alarms tab in virtual center too.
Jeff
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Rankin, James R kz2...@googlemail.comwrote:
Excellent, cheers!
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
--
*From: * Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com
Thanks Matthew, sounds like we need to be mindful of anything we may want to do
in the future on the licensing side.
When I asked about switches, we may be at cross-purposes, I meant ethernet
switches as that's one area where we're looking to bring a vendor in -
obviously anyone decent should
Yep, buy the book, it has nearly all you need to know but were afraid to
ask :)
Other way would be via a vmware HA option (or similar)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:07 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just for posterity, it looks like the only MS-recommended way of providing
I plan to have more than two VM's soon.
And here's the weird . there were no VSS errors in the guest DC for last
evening's backup, nor did the guest go into saved state.
The backup ran 25 minutes after installing yesterday's security patches
(guests and host) and rebooting everything. But
I looking to replace optium projectors, with maybe a dell, since we have a
sales contract with dell.
Any idea what I should look for?
It will be set on table, for boardroom.
--
Justin
IT-TECH
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
+ a bunch on all points.
Our Shoretel system was initially purchased from CDW about 3 years
ago. CDW had to call someone in from out of State to run the install,
which went well enough, but in the aftermath we wanted some support
and at the time CDW didn't have anyone local, and we were not very
Every user that can authenticate CAN BE an Authenticated User. But it's a
dynamic token not a static token.
What are you actually trying to accomplish?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Mark Boeck [mailto:netadmin...@gmail.com]
Sent:
*Palo Alto Networks* - per-user filtering, application filtering, web
categroy filtering etc., rules, AD integration, VPN, multiple networks,
$1500 (?) year...
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:39 AM, pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've finally gotten a budget to put in place a web filtering platform.
Who died?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
So it goes...
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
I want to know if a certain logged-on user is seen by AD as an
AUTHENTICATED USER.
I simply want a list of AUTHENTICATED USERS in my domain.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Every user that can authenticate CAN BE an Authenticated User. But it’s
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote:
I looking to replace optium projectors, with maybe a dell, since we have a
sales contract with dell.
Any idea what I should look for?
Specifications on your requirements.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Like I said, every user that can authenticate CAN BE an Authenticated User. But
it's a dynamic token not a static token.
So, if they are logged on, the answer is yes, they are an Authenticated User.
If you want a list of everyone who could potentially be an Authenticated User,
something like
Using secure LDAP to integrate with AD. It synchs automatically once a day by
using user and group search filter. You can also manually synch.
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 4:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: web filtering
For
I envision that IT will be in charge of phones systems in the future. I
admin our intertel systems for the last 7 years and unless it involves
trunks or doing cross connects on the 66 blocks I do it all. When we moved
one of our offices I had the guy punch all the ports in the phone system
into a
In most places that I know of today, telecom is handled by IT or merged
into the IT department.
Unless you meant something else entirely...
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:56 PM, James Kerr
IOW, there is not point-in-time group or listing which would show you *
All-of-the-user-accounts-that-are-authenticated-this-very-second*.
What is the real objective you are trying to reach, Mark? (Or, for what
broader purpose are you trying to reach this specific objective?)
* *
*ASB*
Make that a CISCO firewall
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Dean Cunningham dean.cunning...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any straws greatfully accepted [?]
Overview
A group of 20 users in a separate domain connect to file resources in
another domain via a 1MB WAN link. The file server (Wk8) is in
clearswift
http://www.clearswift.com/
Used their products for 15 years, would use them again at a drop of a hat
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:39 AM, pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've finally gotten a budget to put in place a web filtering platform.
I've looked at three so far: Websense, iPrism and
Well, what I meant is that IT people will handle all of it. There won't be
a phone guy in the traditional sense anymore. Well maybe there will but
he'll be an IT guy. I imagine a lot of IT depts handle telecom but when
they need work done they hire a phone contractor. I have never worked in an
No, it's been a few years since I've seen any but the largest enterprises
with telecom guys. What I tend to see today is that telecom is just a
service managed by the networking team, or the generic IT team that covers
all things technical.
In the SMB space, I don't know of any telecom guys
The net use command you exemplified below has no password on the command
line - you do have a password included in the actual script, do you not?
Do you get the same logon failures if you run the same logon script from a
non-domain-joined machine on the same LAN as the target server?
Carl
Last $dayjob$ we needed to rebuild the entire infrastructure for
networking. At the time we had cat 3, cat4, cat5, and coax (thicknet) in
the walls. Some of the cat3 was shorted most of the cat4 was causing
issues as well but functioned to some degree and the cat5 was laid accross
lighting so
Shortels do work on other switches at least $dayjob$ they are using Cisco
exclusively. Like Matt I am not the phone guy but I sit across from two of
them. The only complaint I hear them make is during upgrades of older
phone systems. They have to go out and manually fix things in the remote
I did the same thing at my last job. Had all the POTS lines terminated
into a patch panel and I jumpered them to the switch. Made it SO much
easier to tell when a line was down. During power outages we kept a single
line home phone in the room with the demarc just for emergencies. It did
get
We're in this boat. Got any links to what a midsize (2000 seat) Lync
deployment looks like?
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 11:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ShoreTel
I've seen them at quite a few customers and ranked well
Nobody yet...
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 13:28, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Who died?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
So it goes...
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
We put in Procurve 2510s. They work, and match the rest of our switches.
Kurt
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 15:24, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Shortels do work on other switches at least $dayjob$ they are using Cisco
exclusively. Like Matt I am not the phone guy but I sit across from two
Our IT shop handles (read: manage) ALL telecom from pots lines, cell phones
and all telephony. We're moving towards hosted VoIP with Thinking Phone
Networks for all of our branches.
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
We put in Procurve 2510s. They work, and
Thanks Carl , there is a password in the actual script :)
I am just starting to try an emulate the problem, the remote site is a
clients site so hard to test there
Just though soemoen might say yep its this!
It is probably a firewall issue, if not a rule issue , then a RPC inspect
issue on the
My experience is , if possible keep the networks separated to the firewall
at minimum. We did some decent networks (800 users, multi-office with 1gig
wireless connections and fiber uplinks) we did vlans for printers, ip
phones, and management networks. It was great until something went down
Yeah, if your existing wiring is in disarray it completely makes sense
and is probably necessary for any sort of VOIP to work well. And the
way you did it sounds right.
I was just pointing out to the OP that they could consider saving money
and not rewiring with some solutions.
I'm a
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:56 PM, James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com wrote:
... when I run a new extension I don't have to have someone
come out and cross connect it, I just punch it to a different
panel and patch cable it. No more 66 blocks at that facility.
I have seen that before, but you can
How big is the environment? What is the scope of devices?
SEIMs are designed to take logs from multiple sources, do log
collection/analysis, event correlation/alerting. Something like SCOM isn't
designed for that, and ACS does Windows only (AFAIK). How about your firewalls,
AV, HIPS/NIPS,
I've played with Nitro a little bit, and I'm familiar with LogRythm,
although I've never deployed it.
Also consider TriGeo, Splunk Enterprise, and
http://alienvault.com/products/unified-siem/siem
This is not a cheap category of product...
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing
67 matches
Mail list logo
