Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
List Family:
I apologize to the list and Stu for using the list for this purpose, but I am
desperate. My, son Zachary is to be a freshman at the University of
Massachusetts at Dartmouth majoring in Criminal Justice in September. His and
my problem
Or just me??
D
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Questions to ask an interviewer (Sys Admin)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
I'm
All's quiet on the Western front.
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: David L Herrick
First double check the sites setup and make sure each DC is in the right
subnets and that the XP clients in question are in the same site. If that is ok
time to check connectivity and name resolution to the local DC from the 'bad'
XP machine. Has to be one or the other.
And the XP machines
Each writable DC registers an DNS A record for itself -- so you are
just getting round-robin DNS results by pinging / looking up the
domain's domain name. Nothing to be worried about there.
Accessing \\domain.name\netlogon should use the logon server, not a
random A record; use nltest to confirm
So when a user in Site A (with a T1 back to HQ) logs in, then does something
requiring AD services, will they get those services from the local DC, as long
as it shows up when you run the set l command, or will that be random?
Joe Heaton
ITB - Enterprise Server Support
From: Jim Kennedy
If the real problem is that you are getting a different DC when you do
PING, that is fine. Although I'm guessing that you are doing a /flushdns
between each PING ? If not and you are doing this from the same machine
I'm surprised. What you are seeing is Round Robin in DNS. Do an NSLOOKUP
on
As long as the local DC answers yes those services will hit the local DC. Sites
only impacts AD aware services. Ping is an internet thing so it is not Sites
aware. NSlookup...those kinds of things would also not use sites.
From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Monday,
Looks like this (vRAM entitlement) will no longer be an issue.
http://www.crn.com/news/cloud/240005840/vmware-kills-vram-licensing-will-fo
cus-on-vsphere-cloud-bundles.htm
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com http://www.carlwebster.com/
On
While we are not moving away from VMware now, we plan to continue with
planned testing on Server 2012/HyperV v3 snice we pay data center licenses
anyway.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote:
Looks like this (vRAM entitlement) will no longer be an issue.
Yeah, well, Server 2012 Hyper-V pretty much forced that.
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 4:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hooray, I'm moving to VMware!
Looks like this (vRAM entitlement) will no longer be an
Try setting the force option to true.
WshNetwork.RemoveNetworkDrive Z: , true
see
http://ss64.com/vb/driverm.html
Jeff
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote:
Running some VB logon scripts for users to map a few drives. Yes I should
be using GPP. XP
oh, and don't forget the quotes :-)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jeff Bunting bunting.j...@gmail.comwrote:
Try setting the force option to true.
WshNetwork.RemoveNetworkDrive Z: , true
see
http://ss64.com/vb/driverm.html
Jeff
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Kennedy, Jim
Hmmm, a week after 2012 RTM'd.
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hooray, I'm moving to VMware!
Looks like this (vRAM entitlement) will no longer be an issue.
I agree 100%.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com http://www.carlwebster.com/
On 8/20/12 1:59 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Yeah, well, Server 2012 Hyper-V pretty much forced that.
-Original Message-
From:
Guys,
You have been great over the years with this survey, and we compare each year
to the last.
It would be fantastic if you could take a few minutes and fill out this year's
survey ! We give
away an iPad and an iPod, and the odds are pretty darn good.
ITIC’s 2012 Global Server Hardware and
Check subnets and DNS... What DNS server does the client point to...
***
Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.org
Kingman, AZ
***
-Original Message-
From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:13 PM
To:
VMWare had to do it.
Better late than never, but I expect they've lost a little bit of ground
that they didn't have to if they'd thought about it more clearly.
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at
Indeed.
Thanks for the update, Webster...
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Yeah, well, Server 2012 Hyper-V pretty much forced that.
Wooo, never knew or used 'true'. I will try that tomorrow and post my results.
Thanks a ton Jeff.
From: Jeff Bunting [bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 5:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: XP mapped drive whack a mole.
oh, and
20 matches
Mail list logo
