Not deployed but, I'm very surprised no one has brought one to us to connect to
the network/email as a BYOD yet.
Why the post - what are you thinking/working on? Just curious...
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West
Not RT but the project I am on, the IT virtual desktop team is testing the Pro
device and they love them. They prefer them to the iPads. I can't provide any
specifics as that is not the part of the project I am working on.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
Using a Surface RT device but not on the Private Network, in effect its an
ActiveSync device..
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: 20 March 2013 12:09
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
Not deployed but, I'm very surprised no one has brought one to us to connect to
So we use a Citrix environment (it's really old runs on Win2003, is
Presentation Manager v 4.58, has 2 front end web servers as load
balancing, and 2 back end servers in the farm that are running a
single application ).
And what we will be doing is to replace all that with a Win2012
environment,
T -
Just wondering - I'm just starting a trial of GFi MailArcher 2012,
moving away from a previous solution.
Are you using purely SQL server for indexing and message storage, or SQL
and file storage? They advised me to use just SQL for my org, which has
about 200 mailboxes. I'm running the
Sorry, I meant that for Jim.
Ralph
From: Ralph Smith
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:08 AM
To: 'NT System Admin Issues'
Subject: GFi Mailarchiver - Was Exchange mail archiving solution
T -
Just wondering - I'm just starting a trial of GFi MailArcher 2012,
moving away from a
I am running full SQL for both. I think the added speed and the savings in
storage space make it well worth it. But we have the SQL license for other
things...so that may be a factor for you.
From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:14 AM
To: NT
We use a Jatheon appliance here for archiving. Users like how it snaps
into Outlook. Easy to manage and support is good. Seems to be some sort
of *nix backend. I like how there are standard user accounts, admin
accounts, and compliance officer accounts.
275 users but huge user accounts.
On
See, part of the problem is that all the documentation I am finding is
about setting up Remote Desktop Services not as a Role (apparently),
but I need it as a Role. When I inquired previously about this, James
Hill told me:
The guide you have followed is for a VDI installation an hence it uses
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Today's interesting read:
http://internetcensus2012.bitbucket.org/paper.html
I don't know whether to laugh or cry - that's really clever and really
disappointing at the same time.
And, it's going to be replicated, with
Too late...
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Today's interesting read:
http://internetcensus2012.bitbucket.org/paper.html
I don't know whether to laugh or cry - that's
Yeah, I'm sure. Sad, ain't it...
Kurt
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Too late...
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Today's
Indeed (tm).
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Internet Census 2012: Port scanning using insecure embedded devices
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andrew S. Baker
The Pro is very slick and I've got a hospital client that is testing them. So
far, they are very happy with them.
I don't think the RT is appropriate in a business environment. Just IMHO.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:32 AM
To: NT System Admin
We have looked briefly at the RT devices for our on-call team but ruled them
out straight away. We use a Sonicwall remote access device and after speaking
with them we have found out that Microsoft have not written any APIs for
companies like Sonicwall to create remote access software, so no
Why is the RT not appropriate for business?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
The Pro is very slick and I've got a hospital client that is testing them.
So far, they are
I'm very fond of GPOs and full application support.
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
Why is the RT not appropriate for business?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
I have one user with a personal RT in a BYOD scenario that cant connect in
tthrough activesync and it appears this is a very common problem. Hope to see a
fix from MS soon on this. Activesync policy is set to allownonprovisionable
devices with minimal other restrictions and has worked for 100s
My info is from 2008 R2, hopefully 2012 is similar
Session Host (RDSH).
Installed role: Remote Desktop Services. This server is what you'd install say,
MS Office on and this is all you need to create an .RDP file to publish an app
that folks can use if the endpoints are all on-network on the
They are able to be managed via System Centre/Intune as far as I'm aware.
Tobie
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 20 March 2013 15:57
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
I'm very fond of GPOs and full application support.
From: Rod Trent
Yep.here's a couple resources:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/video/tdbe13-managing-windows-rt-devices-
in-the-enterprise.aspx
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2013/03/14/troubleshooting-guide-for-managi
ng-windows-rt-using-configmgr-2012-sp1-and-windows-intune/
From: Tobie
Which apps are you finding you actually need on a companion device?
Storyline. I have both the RT and the Pro. After using the RT for months
and then getting the Pro, I learned to do things differently, and actually
in better ways. There's only two apps that I really need the Pro for and
That is not the level of management provided by GPOs.
From: Tobie Fysh [mailto:tobie.f...@freebridge.org.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
They are able to be managed via System Centre/Intune as far as I'm aware.
Tobie
From:
We have several being used with ActiveSync and they worked with our standard
policy, not sure what option’s you might have enabled.
From: Pete Howard [mailto:pchow...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RT devices?
I have one user with a
We ended up configuring VPN using the built in VPN support on the RT to a Cisco
ASA and it does support IKEv2 which I haven't switched to quite yet.
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:mark.kel...@confused.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
We
Not the same, you mean.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
That is not the level of management provided by GPOs.
From: Tobie Fysh [mailto:tobie.f...@freebridge.org.uk]
Now, who's being mean? :)
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RT devices?
Did you just call MBS mean? :) Mathematical mean or just plain old
ornery mean?
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix
I had a MS PFE onsite at the beginning og the year and he had left the power
brick for his laptop at his last client so he worked the whole week off his
surface RT.
It was kind of surprising how well they had it integrated with their business
systems. Of course if they couldn't pull it off who
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:35 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
My info is from 2008 R2, hopefully 2012 is similar
Session Host (RDSH).
Installed role: Remote Desktop Services. This server is what you'd install
say, MS Office on and this is all you need to create an .RDP file to
SO I am making progress! I had already installed the RDS as a role,
but that didn't configure the deployment. So I went to Server Manager,
clicked on RDS, and clicked on Deploy. It then went into what seemed
like an install of RDS as a service (which had failed before). This
time, however, the
I am literally in the middle of the same deployment coming from Citrix 4.5 .
This completely different from the old TSE days.
If I can make a suggestion that was made to me about the self-signed cert, get
a wildcard one from a trusted CA instead. And make it to a domain that resolves
on the
Curious Joe - are you switching from MPS 4.5 to RDS for cost or other reason(s)
?
Don K
From: Louis, Joe jlo...@guardianalarm.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: Advice
OK thanks. We aren't currently running full SQL for anything else, but
we are also looking at a Time and Attendance product that requires it so
that may factor into the decision on both products.
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:18
It really boils down to new needs. We're rolling out an SAP deployment and
would have had to add more Win/Citrix servers anyway. That was originally the
direction we were going to go.
We compared that to the costs of Citrix vs RDS and the performance (we've found
SAP to be a hog) and RDS
Anyone using Atlantis ILIO for delivering VDI (especially the persistent
variety)? I've been reading some reviews and stats about this and it looks
- well, quite frankly, amazing. The density of VMs and the incredible iOPS
that it can apparently achieve make me think there's really no other choice
Get a cert from a public CA. Far less hassle and they are very inexpensive.
Why do you want to separate the web front end?
James.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2013 4:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Advice on
If you are lucky there will be setting in the printer that allows this. If
you are lucky. Otherwise:-
There are seldom technical solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed
Crowley.
James.
-Original Message-
From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013
I haven't used it but we did review the product to support our XenApp 6.5 w/
PVS implementation. Their dedupe capabilities and IO efficiencies were
definitely very compelling but we opted to invest in FusionIO as an
infrastructure wide solution for high IO needs since their ioDrive and
38 matches
Mail list logo
