Re: IIS Question

2013-05-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Daniele Bartoli danielebart...@gmail.com wrote: Got an IIS question that I am hoping someone can help with. boo-bee-BEEP We're sorry, the list you have posted to is no longer in service. The new address is: nysys...@lists.myitforum.com Please close this

Re: IIS Question

2013-05-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote: Why'd you change the subject line? I didn't, OP apparently posted the same message body twice with two different subject lines. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: IIS Question

2013-05-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: The new address is: nysys...@lists.myitforum.com Shouldn't that have been NTSysAdm? Yes. This thread will now self-destruct. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: The list status

2013-05-03 Thread Ben Scott
What if they had a list and nobody subscribed? It seems like the membership has moved to the MyITForum.com host in the meantime. http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/services/email-lists/ mailto:comm...@lists.myitforum.com?body=subscribe%20NTSysAdm I don't think anyone here subscribed

Re: The list?

2013-05-02 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: ... he isn’t aware we are freaking out. Freaking out? Hardly. More like what happens in the classroom when the teacher steps out for a moment… Except when the teacher steps back in, usually the class is still

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-30 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote: In a sense we had ~500 because each Banyan server was a separate entity from a mail perspective that had to be dealt with individually. The project name had a fancy acronym but Ed just called it the Darwin project. Millennium

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-30 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Pete Howard pchow...@yahoo.com wrote: Bob Free wrote: I had to work with one of the Ed’s, (Crowley) when he used to work here and we migrated to win95/Exchange/NT from win31/Vines. Going old school now .. you must have had some SNADS and PROFS ? I bet they

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-29 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: The end of the month and allegedly the end of the list is tomorrow. We need a plan B to get back in contact to get this going again if possible. Someone got a blog we can bookmark for new/announcements that

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-29 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rod Trent rodtr...@myitforum.com wrote: Done. Link is here: http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/services/email-lists/ Cool. Thanks, Rod! Suggestion: Rename from NTSysADM to NTSysADMIN. If we keep the list names exactly the same, then Bingle searches for

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-29 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Mike Hoffman m...@drumbrae.net wrote: I know I have approx. 12 years of posts in a few public folders and .pst files. I could have a go at uploading stuff? Several years back I subscribed NTSYSADMIN and ExchangeList to http://www.mail-archive.com/. Partly

Re: Disk space management software

2013-04-29 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com wrote: Just FYI, but there *is* a Portable version of windirstat too ( I use it on client's systems specifically because it doesn't need to be installed From PortableApps.com? Or somewhere else? Same binary.

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-29 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Richard McClary richard.mccl...@aspca.org wrote: Question – we’ve had both Rod and Ben offer to host, and both have given links. Correction: All I did was throw up a web page for people to check in case the existing list server suddenly went offline. Do

Re: End of month plan B for list shutdown.

2013-04-29 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:10 PM, MMF mmfree...@ameritech.net wrote: I'm having a problem with signing up for the new list. ... I keep getting error messages each time I click on the second link to the new NTSYSADMIN list. 1. Compose a new email 2. Send to: comm...@lists.myitforum.com 3. Leave

Re: Bad symbolic link in registry

2013-04-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: I have a symlink in the registry of a 08r2 server that I can not remove which is preventing the installation of an app. If i recreate the target I can access it, but still can not delete it. Anyone a tool

Re: ALERT : NTSYSADMIN LIST MIGRATION

2013-04-26 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Richard Sobey r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: RS I was also taught to delete everything not immediately relevant to your reply. RS RS Ah well. I'm a fan of bottom posting - back in the NNTP days. Using Outlook RS makes it very hard :( I've never really understood

Re: Disk space management software

2013-04-26 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com wrote: I use Spacemonger 1.4, the last free version. Prefer it to WinDirStat as it is a standalone executable which doesn't have to be installed. WinDirStat is basically a stand-alone executable. They distribute it

Re: Startup processes

2013-04-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: On a Windows system, is there a process that runs on startup that will only run if there is network connectivity present? I've got a strange requirement and I need to be able to tell when the network is available, if possible.

Re: Startup processes

2013-04-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:35 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I'd think that it would be the ability to copy files and folders from a remote location that would be the definition required in this case. You could do an IF EXIST \\server\share\path\file.txt ... (or the moral

Re: ALERT : NTSYSADMIN LIST MIGRATION

2013-04-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:44 PM, s...@knowbe4.com wrote: You are invited to the new NTSYSADMIN list hosted by KnowBe4. This replaces the Lyris list hosted by Sunbelt Software / GFI, which will shut down at the end of this month. The list is dead! Long live the list! -- Ben ~ Finally,

Re: ALERT : NTSYSADMIN LIST MIGRATION

2013-04-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: No, it's a Ben9K thing. He doesn't believe in top posting. That wasn't me Rod was replying to. Good luck blaming that on posting styles. :) On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Rod Trent rodtr...@myitforum.com

Re: LoJack

2013-04-23 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Art DeKneef art.dekn...@cox.net wrote: You need the BIOS set to Activated and the software application agent installed on the computer for it to fully work. The software agent is what communicates with the recovery center. The BIOS piece maintains its presence

Re: LoJack

2013-04-23 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I think the BIOS piece, if Activated, puts the agent back onto it. Yah, that's scary enough. I mean, sure, if someone else can control the hardware, in theory they can do anything, but think about the implications. Is

Re: LoJack

2013-04-23 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Art DeKneef art.dekn...@cox.net wrote: Excellent question. And I don't have a good answer. LoJack supports Windows 2000 up to Windows 8 and Mac OS 10.3 or higher. But nothing for Linux. So I guess the question is what do you mean by a different OS. I'm

Re: LoJack

2013-04-23 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com wrote: Yah, that's scary enough. I mean, sure, if someone else can control the hardware, in theory they can do anything, but think about the implications. Is there some kind of hook in Windows that lets the BIOS run

Re: Color me skeptical

2013-04-22 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really interested to see if this is the paradigm shift that Google thinks it's going to be. Has Google actually been right about *any* paradigm shifts? (Ponders Buzz and GoogleWave...) They hit paydirt with

Re: Color me skeptical

2013-04-22 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: They hit paydirt with search, don't sort and sell user data/advertising to others, not services to users. But that wasn't a paradigm shift Seems like it is mostly a discussion about what constitutes a paradigm

Re: Cross post on latest round of Java Bugs from Bugtraq

2013-04-22 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote: Today, a vulnerability report with an accompanying Proof of Concept code was sent to Oracle notifying the company of a new security weakness affecting Java SE 7 software. Can we just get an announcement when there

Re: On the subject of security...

2013-04-18 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Not that they're equivalent in power, but that each kind of account can do and has access is different and equally valuable. For the typical home user, which is what that comic is focused on[1], not so much.

Re: Synchronize booksmarks?

2013-04-18 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:22 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: If the Bookmarks folder in Firefox works the same way as Favourites in IE, I don't see why you couldn't redirect them both and then do some scripting to synchronize the folders at logoff. Firefox stores bookmarks in a

Re: Synchronize booksmarks?

2013-04-18 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: Based on previous experience I prompted removed it and therefore found the issue with Outlook. Since then several others here have done the same and had the same issue. The uninstall should be cleaner than it is.

Re: On the subject of security...

2013-04-18 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Protecting root access in a system does have some value when it comes to persistence of malware. Malware that is confined to userland is easier to detect and uproot than malware that makes it to a deeper level. There

Re: Dual Wan Soho High Speed Router Suggestions

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Shane Mullins tsmulli...@gmail.com wrote: Since you mentioned using a PC based router, OpenBSD has supported failover for at least eight years. Performance is great and their security is top notch. OpenBSD uses pf as a firewall. Pf is much easier to use, for

Re: OT - Google Apps down?

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Michael Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having trouble signing into my Google Apps domain. Logging into Gmail is/was erratic for me this morning. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Endpoint backups

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Excellent point. We don’t do roaming profiles here. I view them as evil as Outlook cached mode, perhaps more so. J I love roaming profiles. Sure beats backing up workstations. Of course, I also drop the

Re: Dual Wan Soho High Speed Router Suggestions

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Beach Computers Web Hosting gro...@beachcomp.com wrote: Ideally $150 tops. That narrows the field considerably. Have you tried going to the local Wal-Mart and seeing what's on the shelves? I don't mind using a PC as I have so many laying around, but whatever

Re: On the subject of security...

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:59 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: ...today's XKCD sums it up nicely http://xkcd.com/1200/ So, yeah, that's true if you don't use full disk encryption, or a password on your

Re: On the subject of security...

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: http://xkcd.com/1200/ So, yeah, that's true if you don't use full disk encryption, or a You're missing the point. No, I'm not missing the point. Well, then, you're apparently choosing not to discuss it, then. For an

Re: On the subject of security...

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: IOW: Security is for the MANAGEMENT of risk and MITIGATION of same. For real world systems, and usage of them, there is no such thing as perfect security. That's true, too, but the point Munroe is trying to make is

Re: Can you do this with .CMD?

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:23 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: Use a batch file to launch an application and then send two carriage returns to this app? Well, maybe. The app runs but sits and waits for the password, so it’s only processesing the first CR. And let me guess, the

Re: Can you do this with .CMD?

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Rodriguez drod...@gmail.com wrote: Instead of doing a carriage return put a ^M at the end of your batch file. ^M is just a human-readable representation a carriage return, used by some software to display something that's normally not printable.

Re: Can you do this with .CMD?

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Please, no PoSh because I have tons of XP machines that need to run this... If my guess is correct, PoSh will have the same problem. PowerShell would allow you to use Win32 to fake input, to use WPF to fake

Re: On the subject of security...

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: My point is that you have to use the same methods to protect unprivileged accounts as you do root/administrator. True and unremarkable. There, I did it, too. See how that fails to contribute to the discussion? Not

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:05 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: for /f tokens=2 delims== %%a in ('CTXCliOS.exe ^| find ClientOS') do set ClientOS=%%a call :SET goto :eof :SET reg add HKCU\Software\Custom /v ClientOS /t REG_SZ /d %ClientOS% /f goto :eof What I'm wondering is

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having trouble figuring out how to get the regexp capture out of the $match object returned by Select-String though. Ah, okay, this seems to work: $match = CTXCliOS.exe | Select-String -Pattern 'ClientOS\s

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I've managed to use Select-String to get my output and my variable, it's splitting the variable up (from something like ClientOS=ThinOS_Wyse down to just ThinOS_Wyse) that's frying my brain now. Ah, I ass-umed the

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: This should help. “msg” is just a function that logs all of its arguments to a text file. Hey... this is kind of a threadjack, but your sample code here makes me think of it. In a PoSh script I'm evolving, I'm

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Some of these functions return values, which are captured into variables by the caller. But these functions also want to inform the user of what's going on. *And*, I'd also like to be able to optionally redirect

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:57 PM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Ben, you're a wizard, that worked first time out :-) I am but a humble student. Indeed, I'm getting my feet wet with PoSh for real use for the first time these past few weeks. Part of the reason I did this was to

Re: PowerShell noob help

2013-04-16 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Candee can...@gmail.com wrote: Everything works, except the employeenumber ... ... Any ideas to get the employeenumber to export? I was waiting for someone with a clue to reply, but perhaps they're all busy today. :-) So... Not knowing what I'm doing, I'd

Re: BSOD patch, Microsoft urges removal.

2013-04-15 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:46 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote: Plus they pulled it and re-issued a fixed patch. If you already installed the broken patch, will the patched patch install to patch it? -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-14 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Sorry. I may be an a$$hole, but I have always preferred to give people clues than to give them direct answers. No apologies necessary. I'm a fan of the teach a man to fish approach myself. -- Ben ~ Finally,

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-13 Thread Ben Scott
, as you're the second person to suggest this. :-) On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: If I specify either parameter (or both) as Mandatory=$true, it becomes mandatory *always*, not just when -mailTo is present. So, if I do this [Parameter(Mandatory

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-13 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Bunting bunting.j...@gmail.com wrote: I think you need sets that aren't disjoint, something like I didn't think of that. Good idea. But, I just tried it, and that doesn't work either. :( I'm guessing it makes the base parameter set ambiguous, as it

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-13 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jeff Bunting bunting.j...@gmail.com wrote: I think you need sets that aren't disjoint, something like ... makes the base parameter set ambiguous, as it overlaps exactly with the mailTo parameter set. So, if I don't specify -mailTo, PowerShell pukes trying to

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-13 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: What you are missing is the DefaultParameterSetName. Ahhh... that did it! Thanks for the clue! Finished code, for those so interested: http://pastebin.com/dQbDDqKN It even treats -mailTo as optional when

Re: Google Drive

2013-04-12 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Guyer, Don dgu...@che.org wrote: That is old! Bet people were “Vampire-tapping” back then…or maybe it was 4-wire phone cable. We had a show-and-tell day at our local LUG (Linux User Group) once. I brought in a vampire tap I still keep around for such

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-12 Thread Ben Scott
with a clue-bat, and/or friendly insults. :-) -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 5:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: PowerShell - Dependent parameters Hey all, Is it possible to tell PowerShell that a parameter

Re: PowerShell - Dependent parameters

2013-04-12 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: If can tell PowerShell that one parameter is related to another, but I can't figure out how to tell it one parameter *depends* on another. Correction: First line above should begin with I can tell PowerShell . I

Re: Google Drive

2013-04-10 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:37 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Anyone else using Google Drive and think it is a bit rubbish in general? Wait for the next Service Pack... er, sorry, wrong vendor. It must still be in Beta. Wait another few years. ;-) -- Ben ~ Finally,

Re: Datadomain / Exagrid - Backup Times over Cat5

2013-04-10 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: That depends how fast the network you're running is, and how much data you've got to worry about, and maybe other things. True. I'm trying to backup ~4TB in under 12 hours. 8 hours would be nice... I think a single 1Gig Cat5

Re: Google Drive

2013-04-10 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote: Wait for the next Service Pack... er, sorry, wrong vendor. It's odd: Microsoft is producing fewer and fewer service packs over the years. No, they're not. If anything, they're producing more. They're just

Re: .ZIP file e-mail attachments

2013-04-09 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:51 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: Do any of you guys still allow this? I ask because at %formerjob% they were blocked, but %dayjob% allows them, and last week and today we’ve received infected .ZIP files. Our plan: An email containing any dangerous file is

Re: Datadomain / Exagrid - Backup Times over Cat5

2013-04-09 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to wrap my head around the speed of backup appliances like Data Domain and Exagrid. The thing that doesn't make sense to me is the backups are going across Cat5. It seems like they would be really slow for a full

Re: AD Simple LDAP authentication question

2013-04-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Christopher Bodnar christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote: I know that AD supports both Simple and SASL methods for LDAP binds: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc223499.aspx What I was surprised is that there doesn't seem to be a way to disable the Simple

Re: POSH PtH - this is...

2013-04-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Agree with MBS that other tools could stand in for PowerShell, but WCE was actually new to me. Well, then, you didn't say that, you seemed focused on PoSh. WCE in particular is new to me, too, but I've certainly read of

Re: OfficeFileCache

2013-04-05 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:05 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I've got some user profiles (well, they're virtualized into an SQL database, but that's a moot point) that are showing some large files with a .FSD extension in

Re: Hosts that scan your network

2013-04-01 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Shane Mullins tsmulli...@gmail.com wrote: What do you guys do when hosts scan your network? Some cases are obvious, we had a large US University scanning our network for open http servers. Contacted them and they took care of the issue. Generally speaking, I

Re: Malicious software updates

2013-03-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov wrote: Do you guys apply these updates to your servers, or only the desktops? I try to only apply the benign software updates... though some of the .NET deployments have come close. ;-) If you mean the

Re: Semi OT: Cisco versus Checkpoint Juniper

2013-03-26 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Sophos has done really well with their acquisition of Astaro, and their looking to take on the mid-market with their pricing and feature bundles. They've borked themselves when it comes to selling software, though. We

Re: How easy is it to crack passwords?

2013-03-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Ridiculously easy, unless the password is quite long... http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/03/how-i-became-a-password-cracker/ Weak passwords easy to crack, according to a study published in the American Journal of Stuff

Re: Friday semiOT: funny to me anyway

2013-03-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Michael Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: This day, 1995, Intel dropped the big one... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v

Re: Friday semiOT: funny to me anyway

2013-03-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Rene de Haas rene.deh...@gmail.com wrote: Remember getting one with math error in our first Compaq Proliant. Never bothered exchanging it. Most servers -- especially back then -- don't do a lot of floating point. :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint

Re: Friday semiOT: funny to me anyway

2013-03-24 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: This day, 1995, Intel dropped the big one... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpMvS1Q1sos Let's see... Pentium jokes... right... PENTIUM = Parts Exist Now Though Invariably Undergo Meltdown After the FDIV bug: Q:

Re: Virtualization in small office

2013-03-18 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Every VM has identical virtual hardware. Minor caveat: Every VM within the same physical architecture (AMD vs Intel) has the identical virtual hardware. Ohh... good point. I kind of knew that but the ramifications

Re: Virtualization in small office

2013-03-15 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Hank . hgedr...@gmail.com wrote: I deal mostly with SMB. Virtualization is a great fit if you have a number of physical servers. But what about a single server situation? That's pretty much the exact same scenario I was facing a year ago. You may find the

Re: Gateway Controls for Wireless

2013-03-12 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Greg Sweers gswe...@acts360.com wrote: Anything out there that will just sit in front of all those devices, hand out DHCP and present a AUP page requiring them to accept before allowing out to the internet. This is called a captive portal, FYI. This is a

Re: apipa scripting?

2013-03-09 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: 172.16.0.0/whatever Well, it's 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255, so it's a block out of a /16 network. 172.16.0.0/12 is what Kurt was looking for. I remember it as Halfway in size between 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/8.

Re: Ironic Kaspersky bug

2013-03-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Lots of irony. They didn't respond in a timely fashion, or so the story goes. Their computers kept freezing. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: apipa scripting?

2013-03-08 Thread Ben Scott
I'll add my voice to what everyone else is saying: You want to keep using DHCP. Use DHCP to assign static addresses. It makes so many things so much easier. If you need to renumber your network (and some day, you will), it means you just change the DHCP config. If you change something like a

Re: Normalizing a disk image

2013-03-07 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: I have still not found anything about booting multiple times before sealing the image. This reminds me of the old Unix superstition, sync three times before shutting down. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security

Re: Semi-OT: Vsphere shutdown

2013-03-05 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote: It has now been a bit over 24 hours since I brought the datacenter back online and, so far, everything seems to be running smoothly. http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mf56gs6FpZ1raprkq.gif (SFW) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful

Re: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure Storage Disruption

2013-03-05 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Tim Evans tev...@sparling.com wrote: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazure/archive/2013/03/01/details-of-the-february-22nd-2013-windows-azure-storage-disruption.aspx I give MSFT credit for doing a good analysis and *publishing it*. A lot of companies just say

Re: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure Storage Disruption

2013-03-05 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: But at the most basic level – it was a human error (as I read it). “Someone” didn’t mark the update package as a critical update. At the most basic level, all errors are human errors. :-) Either someone didn't

Re: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure Storage Disruption

2013-03-05 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote: Did you just manage to agree and also imply Sure, they released it but are probably still not telling us what 'really happened? why wouldn't you take this at face value? Because people lie? And big companies lie? --

Re: Semi-OT: Vsphere shutdown

2013-03-02 Thread Ben Scott
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Know who you need to call, in case things (storage, servers, apps, whatever) don’t come back up. You don’t want to be trying to find phone numbers when everything’s going to the dogs. Come to think of it, you way want

Re: Webster's question is very timely...

2013-02-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: So, I'm also looking for an external drive, either USB3 or eSATA - if you had the choice, which would you choose for putting in the laptop case for extra storage? I'd go with eSATA if available. I expect any USB3 drive on

Re: Webster's question is very timely...

2013-02-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: Your warranty should start at time of purchase with receipt for proof. Nope, when I did the RMA request and typed in my serial #, the site told me the warranty had expired. That's the case if you don't have proof of

Re: Color me skeptical

2013-02-27 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Christopher Bodnar christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote: I'm really interested to see if this is the paradigm shift that Google thinks it's going to be. I think if they can really work out the issues, it will be. But I'm not convinced they can at this point.

Re: Badging systems

2013-02-27 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@sfgtrust.com wrote: I'm in the market for a new badge system. Don't buy anything from Honeywell/Northern Computing (NetAXS, WIN-PAK, etc.). It's crap and their support stinks. (No prizes for guessing how I know this.) - swipe units must

Re: Remote control software

2013-02-27 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Upgrading 95 and nt4 isn't an option due to the expense One bit of malware will put paid to that argument... Actually, I bet most malware today wouldn't know what to do with Windows 95. (For real security, they should

Re: Remote control software

2013-02-27 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, I bet most malware today wouldn't know what to do with Windows 95. That's not a bet I'd want to make with my paycheck... I have no problem it. I'll call my bookie and make the bet with your paycheck. ;-)

Re: P2V OEM Windows 2003

2013-02-27 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: I have a question that I hope someone can help me with. Have anyone you run P2V a OEM copy of Windows 2003 and then when you run it on the HV server try to activate it with a different license key that is not

Re: MS Azure cloud evaporates

2013-02-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: In large, complex environments, with lots of moving parts, things go wrong. ... Unfortunately, I don't know the answer to making it all work. Well, as has been noted, one mechanism that's been proven to work well is

Re: MS Azure cloud evaporates

2013-02-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: (2) Large orgs are by definition complex ... There is necessary complexity, and unnecessary complexity. ... Point (2) is the former. If the world wants cheap air travel ... or $250 computers, or aircraft carriers,

Re: Backup - Axcient, Dell AppAssure or Unitrends applaince

2013-02-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, chipsh...@comcast.net wrote: Any one on the list using any of these three? Looking for feedback on the products listed, off list or on. Thanks. AOL, I mean, me too. :-) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: File limitation error:updated

2013-02-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Chinnery, Paul pa...@mmcwm.com wrote: ... From what the tech said, the problem may exhibit itself when more 300,000 files have been placed. ... I don't understand why it took so long since there are over 1M files there. ... Whenever a software company,

Re: MS Azure cloud evaporates

2013-02-24 Thread Ben Scott
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:47 AM, sep...@gmail.com wrote: Things happen. I imagine meetings are happening and discussions on how to root this out again are occurring. Sure. But when the same sort of things keep happening, it stops being an accident and becomes negligence. -- Ben ~ Finally,

Re: Books about software

2013-02-20 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote: You don't. Nothing says you have to talk to a vender or a developer or an engineer about a piece of software to write a book about it. Well, technically speaking, a lot of the license agreements do. For example, the

Re: Backup to cloud?

2013-02-14 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Guyer, Don dgu...@che.org wrote: This is where the term “the cloud” becomes murky, in my opinion. If I’m sending data over a private circuit to a 3rd party data center, is that really “the cloud”? If you ask the marketing department, Yes. If you ask the

Re: Office 2013 retail tied to single PCs

2013-02-13 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote: I just downloaded LibreOffice 4 this morning, and I've been playing with it on various word documents... Thus far, it's very good. The big problem with (Star|Open|Libre)Office has always been scripts (macros).

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >