I always do this with Group Policy. Make sure you exclude your Terminal Servers
from the policy, though.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Tuesday
overkill to me.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Don Kuhlman [mailto:drkuhl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Office 365 Email Migration steps
gone yet something is
depending on it. Take an ldifde dump of your DNS storage in AD in case you need
to bring back any records.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent
I would switch to Export-Csv and then you can use Excel to do some of your
munging.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Don Kuhlman [mailto:drkuhl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 10:22 AM
To: NT System
I haven’t a clue, but, isn't the specific tape media/type abstracted to the
backup program via the driver?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4
Doesn't really scale beyond a couple DCs.
I would generally recommend a monitoring tool that has AD specific monitoring
capabilities.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent
Don-
You might refactor this code to use S.DS.AccountManagement. It abstracts all
this stuff for you.
You’re going to start needing to think about global catalogs also with multiple
domains, universal groups, etc.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w
Really? I run all mine natively with powershell.exe in the task scheduler.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:40 PM
To: NT System
DigiCert for certs hands down. I can't comment on DNS providers.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:25 PM
To: NT System Admin
once your old server is offline
- In the event you bring your old server back up, the objects will be recreated
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February
of the day, someone’s budget has to cover
this.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject
I would go straight to WS2012.
From an AD perspective, you can take advantage of new features like
virtualization safeties, group managed service accounts, and dynamic access
control.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
Yes it's block level. IIRC down to like 64KB blocks that it does the diff at.
Once you put the first image out there, you should only expect to replicate the
diffs in all the other images.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c
To add to Michael's point, this wasn't necessary and probably wasn't the best
idea. The consultant obviously messed something up given you had to rejoin
clients. The simple fact that the consultant was happy to (and possibly
recommended) this domain rename tells me a lot.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
looking at $900 versus
whatever for the actual guarantee. If I was the customer I'd simply pay Dell.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 3:01 PM
Ask your insurance agent about what your liability coverage looks like for
storing a customer’s data in your office/home office. I certainly would not
want to carry this risk.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From
I would do some research on how this is done in university dorms and such.
Search on ResNet - the usual term for that type of setup.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden
Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy
When I worked for a K-12 (~450K students), we issued accounts to all students
at any school that was using our central AD. I've seen the same practice at the
other K-12 districts I've worked at.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c
to write.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 11:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState
Good to know.
Now
to do the mass cleanup. A
student's identity could persist throughout their relationship with your
district. As long as you have the SIS primary key in AD (e.g. the student/empl
ID), that sync should be really easy.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w
to), is
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local
user wouldn't solve?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013
How about you create an AD Group, nest the AD group in local admins, and add
the relevant users? GPOs and extra accounts for a dev box like this sounds like
substantial unnecessary overhead.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c
to the right
people.
Thanks,
Brian
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL and the new
I definitely wouldn't introduce this thing into an existing domain/forest and
risk what might replicate out of one of these.
Interesting for sure, but, practical - not so much IMO.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message
You have to manually enable scavenging for that zone (and on a server to do it)
which folks often don't do.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:53 AM
To: NT
Correct - records with a timestamp of 0 (GUI calls them static records) never
get cleaned up.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I reached out to DigiCert about this.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SSL and the new
They have the Windows Azure Websites which also has a free tier. I started
working on moving my site there. The PoC I did seems to work.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com
Windows clustering has changed substantially since Windows 2000. Give it a try
with 2008R2 or 2012.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 6
You'd want the account manager or their attached ATS to help there - TAMs are
for premier support and PAM is for partners.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent
That's more of a function of the GPOs though. You can start taking advantage of
that independent of the AD upgrade itself.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:jt...@teachtci.com]
Sent: Thursday
It’s included in some EAs too – pseudo free.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 9:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A question about
it up.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Wilby [mailto:gavin.wi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 1:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Multi Account Outlook sent items
Correct, the email
Same here - multiple happy customers.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: System
They’re Cisco native hardware now
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Servers - Cisco UCS C220 M3 instead of HP DL360
want to stand up an SCVMM server to manage HyperV and/or ESX. I found
the install and figuring it out to be pretty painless. It includes its own SQL
license of sort so you don’t have to pay extra for that.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From
Yeah – good catch.
My Chicago Public Schools math…
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Art DeKneef [mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows InTune
Brian,
Don’t you
I have a 15.4” Elitebook that I carry in my backpack anytime I’m on the road.
It’s really not that bad and I can actually get some work done on it. For me at
least, the tiny keyboards and low res screens are really annoying.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c
.
I think SCCM expects a trusted cert on each device for the Internet client
scenario so that's why you need the internal PKI infrastructure.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:riverside
That fix is included in SP2...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 6:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 2003 R2 hotfix, but I think it's
exception where
you can do this securely is with RODCs. In this case, you can grant a group
local administrative access to the RODC with the manager attribute on the
RODC's computer account.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message
Just make sure you don't write an inefficient filter that takes forever to
process...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 10:50 AM
There is a free level of DNS with GoDaddy if you need like 100 records. That's
what I use for most of my domains. It works just fine and supports O365 records.
I've used DynDns' pay service in the past too.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
Setting adminCount to 0 wont independently do anything - you need to also mark
the object to inherit security permissions again also.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 10:33
That rate is fine, but, IMO (and from other folks chiming in) the actual hours
count seems high
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:47 AM
To: NT
So:
$38K @ $150 = 253 hours, or, 6 weeks of work for one resource
$38K @ $175 = 217 hours, or about 5 weeks of work for one resource
Both labor estimates seem a bit on the high side to me. What's the vendor's
rate?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c
Why does installing Lync necessitate a CA? Just get the certs from a commercial
CA.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: jwalt...@specservices.com [mailto:jwalt...@specservices.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:49 PM
To: NT System Admin
I agree with Ken that this should be irrelevant.
I would use Fiddler and figure out what's going on at the HTTP level. There was
an issue around this with cert based auth enabled on the IIS end and a recent
(April or May ?) Outlook 2010 rollup in place.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
Yes - that is the only back out plan.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Schema upgrade/rollback
I'm not worried in the least
I think 99.99% is overdoing it. I'm pretty sure there is more than .01% of
customers who want HA for their AuthN to email, IM, SharePoint, partner apps,
etc.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com
from there. Then on the other end you can cross
connect to the switch or whatever.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Re
), they agree to IT
policies X, Y, and Z (patching, a/v, etc.).
Also factor in how you’re a/v in particular is licensed.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent
I use this as well, or a NetApp ONTAP simulator. Windows Server 2012 has an
in-box iSCSI target.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 7:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
That's on a 2xDual Core Xeon 5160 box w/ 28GB RAM and 4x1T SATA RAID10. Box is
about 5 years old. I have a newer dual QC i7 box with 48GB that I haven't
really started using yet due to lack of time.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
What is it that you fear will happen that this proposed process will protect
you from?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 2:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Schema
You can pass session level execution policy by adding a -ExecutionPolicy
argument to your powershell.exe call.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 9:49 AM
and
then analyzing it.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SQL Cluster Disk IO issues
Hi all,
I'm looking for some advice
Does the request show up in the IIS log? What's the status code?
What's between the CAS server and the user - firewalls, load balancers, reverse
proxies, etc?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent
That is my understanding and recollection as well...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 4:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Microsoft Office 2010
Did they have you enable driver verifier with 'Force IRQL Checking' enabled?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:14 PM
To: NT System
Generally without that flag, the dumps are pretty useless for this particular
crash.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:56 PM
To: NT
and then swipe your badge on any machine to release
the job. In the process it goes on your tab. I know Canon has a solution here.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, April 28
My experience is that many customers who implement these managed print
solutions see some sort of savings but hate the resultant end user and IT
experiences.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi
MigrationWiz might be able to do this for you.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPOS to Exchange on-premise
We had
The IronMountain DPM stuff was pricey when I talked to them three years ago.
Would be curious to hear if it's come down at all.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent
That's an interesting idea - I haven't. Do you still need to put a special
breaker in to isolate it?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin
If you wait to migrate the tenant to Office365, it will be easy to do with the
in-box tools.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:02 PM
To: NT System Admin
Sounds overkill. I just bought a D-Link WAP for my house a couple weeks ago
that's out of their SMB type line and it even has a little basic wireless
controller function built into it. Got it for perhaps 120 bucks on Amazon.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c
I picked one of these up - http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=DAP-2553. Seems
featureful, works well (so far), and was reasonably easy to configure. Make
sure you flash the firmware as there's a bunch of new functionality.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c
btw the reason I picked that one over other competing or cheaper models is that
the Ethernet port on it is GigE. Many of these N-band APs have 100meg ports and
I wanted to make sure that I could push 100mbps over the air down to the
switch it's plugged into.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
. Nice for real
world testing but also obnoxious when you just want something to work quickly.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I haven't used these formats before, but, three general thoughts:
* Will the certs MMC solve this for you?
* What about certutil.exe?
* The OpenSSL Windows command line utility is a great resource for
converting all manner of certificate formats.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
The documentation currently says #1, but, I expect in the next 6-12 months you
will see that shift to #2. I don't have a problem personally with #1.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc
Do you have root cert auto updating enabled?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: code signing certificate
5-6 guests per host? How tiny are these hosts?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hooray, I'm moving to VMware!
We average 5
HyperV would save you 5 grand in licenses and the memory issues assuming
vSphere doesn't have a specific feature you need.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Friday, April
Given he is going NetApp, I'd be looking at their VMWare integration.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:54 PM
To: NT System Admin
Yep - call Darren @ sdmsoftware.com. He's got the tools to do this right.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GPO Reporting
Many of my customers are doing this with SCCM.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: PC power management
Are any of you using
In a single domain forest (or even many multi-domain domain forests today), I
would just do all uni groups.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin
Nothing really happens when you toggle that button other than an update to the
groupType (IIRC that's the one) attribute. Replication is smart enough in a
multi-domain environment on GCs to sync the membership into the GC's database.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w
GCs always get uni group membership. Universal Group Caching is generally
speaking not something you want.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Lora Cates [mailto:lora.ca...@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:33 PM
To: NT System
,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Lora Cates [mailto:lora.ca...@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Domain local vs. global vs. universal
I too am looking into this for a coming migration
, that leaves you with a multi-domain forest where every DC in a given domain
isn't a GC. In this scenario you need to worry about IM placement in that
domain.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Patrick Salmon [mailto:psal...@gmail.com]
Sent
UGC gets enabled on a DC which isn’t a GC. It’s got a lot of side effects and
strange behaviors. Without a really good reason you should not be going down
that path.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Lora Cates [mailto:lora.ca
. The overhead here is minimal
compared to the cost of migrating out of the largest child.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject
that connotes a
fairly high degree of trust.
IMO it's a good practice. Most any script or binary that leaves my computer
gets signed.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Wednesday
Aside from the security side of things in terms of process for issuing the
cert, don't forget the timestamp server and to timestamp your signatures.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday
that will sign most anything.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Script signing ?
I offer a Signed version of all my PowerShell
I have two Dell Precision workstations that have 2 sockets each in them,
32-48GB of RAM each, and 4-8 drives each. They make a very noticeable impact on
my electricity bill (Chicago). They're essentially server components in a
workstation case with quiet fans.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
I get Dell Precision workstations off their outlet store. Both the ones I have
were good deals in terms of cost/components.
I just upgrade the RAM periodically when I run out of capacity.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Joseph L. Casale
}
}
else
{
return $false
}
}
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject
Also on the volume licensing site.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: System Center 2012
Yep. I'm downloading
Have you considered just buying Red Gate's tools that do this? They're a couple
hundred bucks and are going to be infinitely more mature than a home grown
tool...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L
Your experience will be *way* better though with multiple spindles. I use 4x1T
SATA RAID10 in my VM hosts and it works great.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 6:15 PM
You could just put it in $foo or some variable. No need to dump it to a temp
file.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 7:16 PM
To: NT
I assure you it's how it works. :)
There's a rather limited number ways to run in-process in LSA to have that
level of access. Password filter is one of them.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel
AD returns errors via the mechanism LDAP provides to do that...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Re: OldCmp.exe
NetApp has SnapMirror
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 8:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Disaster Recovery Solutions
Outside
1 - 100 of 1370 matches
Mail list logo