Now that's interesting!
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Found 1 thing Win7 can't do
I used the version of sysprep that came with Win7.
Webster
From: Sam Cayze
Yea. I installed it in ESX using Vista as the host type. No issues.
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 5:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
VMware Workstation 6.5 sees Windows 7 as Vista and has no problems
Yea I was pleasantly shocked at the fact that my F5 SSL VPN client worked on
W7/IE8.
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
? Everything I have
tried so far runs great as long as it was Vista-capable to begin with.
TVK
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Yea I was pleasantly shocked at the fact
What if you put the host into Maintenance Mode? That should stop the alarm.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: VMWare alarm question
Hoping one of you VMWare gurus can answer
You notice the resounding theme that all of this stuff was released in a
period where MS was just pumping out half baked crap.
Vista
Office 2007
Some server products that will go unnamed.
Most of it has been taken care of in subsequent service packs and for the
most part are solid now. But
If you do a ver in Windows 7, it comes back as 6.1.7000
Whereas Vista SP1 is 6.0.6001
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:51
with that,
either)
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
If you do a ver in Windows 7, it comes back as 6.1.7000
in production and
still got an alert email when I restarted it in maintenance mode.
Just found this post:
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/119038
so guess this feature doesn't work (we have v2.5 running)
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com
wrote
Now
Faster than Vista or XP?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Indeed.
I personally don't think there is much of anything GREAT about Vista. But I
don't think it's bad either. To me it's just not that much bang for the buck
as far as upgrade
That sure is what it sounds like
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: CSA and VMWare
Spanning trees
You need to enable portfast on that port.
Benjamin Zachary - Lists wrote:
Don't think SAN vendors haven't taken notice of that. That's why when
evaluating, you need to look at the applications.
Let's face it, ANYONE can sell you a bunch of cheap disk. The back pages of
PCMagazine and full of players.
But, look at what else they can offer you. Things like native
Take it one step further.
Change to template to doc.
Open in 2007
Save As Template
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Strange Word template issue
Template was originally created in Word 2k3.
If I had an ESX Server and a Windows VM in there, I would install AV on the
Windows VM. But I wouldn't run AV on the ESX host.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 8:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A/V on VM Host
+1
As for the MS virtualization policy see:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957006/
And remember, just because something isn't on here doesn't mean it can't be
virtualized. It's just not officially supported.
ESX falls under the SVVP program.
From: Andy Shook
You must be new around here. :)
-Original Message-
From: Edward B. DREGER [mailto:eddy+public+s...@noc.everquick.net]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 10:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Aaaiiiyyyee!!! OOO notices! (OT)
I normally get a few OOOs in response to a post... but
The rule of demo's is assume nothing will work.
So even if boss boss says it will work, what will the guy do if it doesn't?
Could he order the wireless service onsite?
From: ro...@office [mailto:rjr-off...@stl-logicalsolutions.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 5:12 AM
To: NT System
I doubt it. This doesn't appear to be a gaping hole like the other ones
were.
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 6:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Microsoft Security Advisory Notification
Think there'll be an
Season's Greetings to you as well James. And to everyone else on here as
well!
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 6:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Season's greetings
As I am about to commence my holidays, I would like to take
Don’t do OS upgrades? :)
If it was me, I would delete the printer and then reinstall with the latest XP
drivers and take it from there.
-Original Message-
From: cpusunb...@cox.net [mailto:cpusunb...@cox.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 9:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
It's been like this for 20 years. It apparently hasn't slowed them down too
much. J
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 7:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT - Anyone VM a Mac Leopard OS on a PC?
Thanks to everyone
I don't think a lot of people recognize the exposure to the company when
people are working during sick leave or on disability.
That's why in the past when dealing with folks in this situation I disable
their account, put an alternate recipient on their email, and take away or
turn everything
Same here.
It worked until I made one small change to it and blew up. I think the total
life span was in the area 10 minutes.
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Anyone VM a Mac
Good man. Take an extra 5 minutes for lunch!
From: Phil Guevara [mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Terminal Server - Licensing Issue
I think I fixed it.
_
From: Phil Guevara
all 8130 Pearls CDMA by default? Or are
there multiple types of 8130s? A download for one should work for all if
the vendor.xml file is removed, right?
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 6:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE
that meeting
requests from me (an outside domain), the administrator account and my test
user account all work fine is driving me nuts. It seems to be inter office
requests.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
they'd just point the finger at the other.
I'd say this was definitely a blackberry issue, but the fact that meeting
requests from me (an outside domain), the administrator account and my test
user account all work fine is driving me nuts. It seems to be inter office
requests.
From: Martin
Just need to find a guinna pig
phone to try.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrading BES
I think Sprint is behind the times. Verizon is at 4.5 which is a significant
upgrade
I would be willing to bet the download is corrupt. There is no reason it
wouldn't run on 32 bit machine (since that is what BES runs on).
A couple of other things that come to mind in regards to meeting requests
are permissions and perhaps even the BB OS version on the handheld. Everyone
I think it will go away next time the clients report in.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Declining an already approved WSUS update
I made a bonehead mistake, and approved the installation of
I think its 4.1 SP6 (most current version)
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BB Storm management
While I generally stay current on my BES patches on all my BES servers, I
want to say the IT Policies
,
which was previously known as BlackBerry Device Software Version 4.3.1, is
not yet available.
SP6 included enhancements including the new OCS client, HTML and rich
content emails messages, and just a few others. Many bug fixes relating to
E2K7.
- John Barsodi
From: Martin Blackstone
Typically when you upgrade the OS you need to reactivate the phone to the
BES server.
That usually means just sending them a new activation code and going through
the steps (Options, Advanced Options, Enterprise Activation). No need to
reset or wipe the device.
You may also try:
1. Options
Since there is no thumbwheel or ball, click whatever the heck you are
supposed to click to simulate balls or thumbwheels.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 12:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BB Storm
Typically when you
: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 15:45
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BB Storm
Since there is no thumbwheel or ball, click whatever the heck you are
supposed to click to simulate balls or thumbwheels.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Here you go
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dance-lyrics.com/ama/othe
r_songs_b5o6hx.jpgimgrefurl=http://www.dance-lyrics.com/artists/commodo
res.htmusg=__Y5zyYJa2Yd9sCe1EofrbyuWK6hg=h=298w=300sz=31hl=enstart=2u
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Retro Goodness
Got any Earth, Wind and Fire?
--
ME2
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here you go
From: John
Google is your friend here.
None of the standard AV / Antispyware tools is going to be of much help.
I've had good luck with helping friends and colleagues by using this.
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/malware-removal/uninstall-antivirus-2009
From: Sharie Breaux [mailto:[EMAIL
That's what I would recommend.
From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need help deleting Virus Response Lab 2009 from daughter's
computer
Did you try malware bytes anti malware ?
From: Sharie Breaux
That's what I'm thinking as well.
There may be bad memory.
Try running this though I'm not sure it will help.
%SystemRoot%\system32\MdSched.exe
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
I've often found memory testers to be very unreliable...It's worth trying,
but you may not be able to prove it without removing it.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I
- no errors.
Argh.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Did I just say that?
I'm tired...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I need some hardware help...
I guess just keep an eye on it.
-Original Message-
From
SuperMicro is a great non brand name. Many of the appliance systems you
buy today run on SuperMicro. http://www.supermicro.com/
I usually purchase them from Servers Direct.
They very helpful and are more than willing to build any configuration you
want.
Im sure you could find a Super Micro vendor
It's of value but nowhere near as fun as Facebook.
-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: LinkedIn?
Anyone here belong to LinkedIn? Found it any use?
Angus
~ Finally,
NetApp has a similar program.
http://www.netapp.com/us/solutions/infrastructure/virtualization/guarantee.h
tml
From: Dallas Burnworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wasabi VMX 2000 vs. HP EVA 4400
Compellent
Just because everything written in .NET runs at about 1/3 the speed it did
before doesn't mean it sucks.
Actually the framework itself is pretty sweet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New .NET Rootkits are you safe?
Just because everything written in .NET runs at about 1/3 the speed
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New .NET Rootkits are you safe?
Just because everything written in .NET runs at about 1/3 the speed it did
before doesn't mean it sucks.
Actually
I wouldn't use VMware Server or MS Virtual Server for an Enterprise app.
I would use ESX (or ESXi). Or Hyper-V if that is your flavor of choice.
-Original Message-
From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: vmserver or
I believe the same goes for HyperV as well.
As for specific to BB, we do all activations wirelessly.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: vmserver or esxi
ESX doesn't handle
that is setup, phone and
email
reception works just fine.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the same goes for HyperV as well.
As for specific to BB, we do all activations
wirelessly
Aye. Have seen this too many times to count.
From: David L Herrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What could cause this VPN issue?
+1
From: Sean Rector [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14,
We use (and sell) Aruba. I have not done the N yet but have G deployed
through my office and it is the only method our staff use to connect to the
network. We have not had one minute of unplanned downtime with the Aruba in
the year we have used it. Not a single one.
I love this part. It is the
The one that requires Java 5.1.3.2.5.2.555 exactly or won't work.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Assistance
When you use the ASA GUI to make rule changes, it doesn't put the correct
using ADSM 5.0(6) and it claims Java
Version 1.6.0_02 ... not even close to what you list...
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject
You beat me to it.
-Original Message-
From: N Parr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 6:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Activation @#% !!!
You can do a wipe like that from the advanced option/security menu also.
-Original
#1 BB Test.
Can you browse the internet with the web browser? If you can't, it's not
provisioned and you need to call Verizon.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 6:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry
+1
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT Departmental Meetings
I gotta tell you guys - I go into lots of companies where one of their major
issues is a lack of interdepartmental
Concur.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: webiste to create zip file
Then I would stick to ZIP. Why burden clients with stuff like this?
--
Mike Gill
-Original
Knowing Vista, whatever the problem is will take an act of God and Congress
to fix.
I'll tell you, I can fix about any XP problem but with Vista more often than
not, I have to flatten the box.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November
zip file
Political reasons. Not much choice
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 12:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: webiste to create zip file
Concur.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Gill [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm looking for something other than Windows search that will show me files
modified in the last X days.
For example give me a list of every file modified in the last 2 days or
since X date.
Seems pretty simple.
Gracias
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
that.
On 11/5/08, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for something other than Windows search that will show me
files
modified in the last X days.
For example give me a list of every file modified in the last 2 days or
since X date.
Seems pretty simple.
Gracias
This was a great one. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Find Recently Modified Files
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Live of course as well.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many of you are using Google apps in the business place today? I'm
interested in the collaboration features, but not the email.
Just wondering if any of you out here have tested
PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com b: www.sunbeltblog.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 8:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Google Apps
We are generally interested in the collaboration
As long as you don't need to boot and once you disable UAC, it's not bad.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Going back to XP?
I like Vista, it has some very nice perks,
How many of you are using Google apps in the business place today? I'm
interested in the collaboration features, but not the email.
Just wondering if any of you out here have tested or deployed it.
Thx
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
sales/marketing-driven organization.
--
ME2
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many of you are using Google apps in the business place today? I'm
interested in the collaboration features, but not the email.
Just wondering if any of you out here have
30 phones or not in an SBS environment
or want MDS, you should always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
They got bought by Oracle. Now everything is commercial and licensed $10K
per CPU.
From: Ken Hoegeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Is SourceForge down?
I can't get this site. Did I miss any news about their
environment
or want MDS, you should always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
specifically for the SBS market. If you are
planning on ever deploying more than 30 phones or not in an SBS environment
or want MDS, you should always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28
always just go with Enterprise on its own box, even
if it's just an old used PC.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I've noticed that as well. I would never ever install BES
W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
Painfully sent to you from my Blackberry
_
From: Martin Blackstone
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Wed Oct 29 14:48:53 2008
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I always have a problem with PPC RDP clients. I mean how do you
or via SMTP ?
--
ME2
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Gmail!
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
Nice triple post Blackstone
Your execs sound like smart guys.
Here is a product comparison.
http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/#tab_tab_compare
Professional is essentially for smaller deployments. It's like BES SBS. It
won't support over 30 BB devices.
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
docs. How about PDFs? Again,
I'm not trying to flame here, just trying to get a better understanding of
what the real truth is.
Thanks,
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin
Why did my WSUS download more updates today? Seriously?
New Update Alert
The following 16 new updates have been synchronized to T3UTIL since Tuesday,
October 28, 2008 7:15 PM (GMT).
Critical and Security Updates
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947821 System Update Readiness Tool for
the version of
the desktop software. Is that the same as what will be on the phone? If
so, the 8830 has 4.2, and the Curve has 4.3.
Should I hold out to see if they can deliver 4.5?
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28
Oh yea, here is what I call the motherload link.
http://www.dynoplex.com/rimos.shtml
Links to all the carriers and their respective BB OS updates.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry
Training Panel
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
This was something I posted on another list and I admit I may be off base on
some of it.
The device:
Frequent OS updates
software. Is that the same as what will be on the phone? If
so, the 8830 has 4.2, and the Curve has 4.3.
Should I hold out to see if they can deliver 4.5?
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:25 PM
To: NT
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: More Updates
Yup, I have them on mine also.
S
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 6:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: More Updates
Why did my WSUS download more updates today? Seriously?
New Update
is 'sized to run on email
server', which I thought was interesting...
_
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
Your execs sound like smart guys.
Here is a product comparison
___ = Shook
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 1:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Out of Cycle Critical Windows Patch ?
Why would you want to find ME2's giggle spot unless you're ___
Shook
From: Jim Majorowicz
They probably only regression tested back to 1987.
From: Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: KB958644
Anyone have any issues with the RPC/SMB patch? One of my users is saying it
effected his ProComm. In
I'm not sure I would agree with that. Developing a fix isn't a 15 minute
job. The chances are they were already hard at work on it. There is a ton of
compatibility and regression testing that goes into a fax.
They probably got their hand forced because it was out in the wild, but I
wouldn't go so
Fax = fix
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 7:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Out of Cycle Critical Windows Patch ?
I'm not sure I would agree with that. Developing a fix isn't a 15 minute
job. The chances
The 6800 is on the HCL.
http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/1032
The problem is they only test specific configurations.
From: Joe Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 6:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VMware Server 2.0
According to what I
Indeed.
Plan accordingly. And for god's sake, don't install BES on your Exchange
server. In other words, get more hardware. PC or VM works fine.
From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: One Blackberry device
Or Bob
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 4:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: So, I'm up late patching systems, and getting cranky...
Or NT4...
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue.
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 16:37 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE
301 - 400 of 927 matches
Mail list logo
