Thanks Ben! This list makes me look good, so returning the favor in a small way
is the least I can do.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success
He really misses Shookie, that's all.
Joe Heaton
ITB - Windows Server Support
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 4:36 PM
To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
On Tue
On 1/18/2012 9:50 AM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote:
He really misses Shookie, that's all.
Whatever happened to Shook, anyway? I don't get to follow this group all
that closely anymore
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
He's IRL now...
--
Espi
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Mike Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/18/2012 9:50 AM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote:
He really misses Shookie, that's all.
Whatever happened to Shook, anyway? I don't get to follow this group all
that closely anymore
~
Shook is extremely busy with Peak10. He rejoined the list a while back
but had to leave, again, because of his work schedule. I will be spending
3 weeks in Charlotte, NC in March and will be there for his birthday (the
7th). Hope to get to spend some time with him.
Thanks
Carl Webster
Please give him a wet-willie for me.
--
Espi
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote:
Shook is extremely busy with Peak10. He rejoined the list a while back
but had to leave, again, because of his work schedule. I will be spending
3 weeks in Charlotte, NC
,
** **
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
** **
*From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, January 16, 2012 4:15 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success
/
1.i.e. cleaning up all of MBS' red ink from shredding my articles to
pieces
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
2 hours of screenshots and obfuscation and I am only
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
How your first blog post coming?
A lot of my articles cover 5 to 30 minute processes and it can take a couple of
weeks to several months to go thru the entire writing process [1].
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix
I submitted the document less than two hours ago. Wait, it will actually seen?
:)
Dave
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
How your first blog post coming?
A lot
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
How your first blog post coming?
A lot of my articles cover 5
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
As you guys know, after much gnashing on this list I was finally
able to get SAML working with ADFS. ...
Hey, Dave, I just wanted to voice some more thanks for posting this,
and saying yes to the follow-up offer from MBS.
hands Ben a baby wipe
You've got something on your lips..
/hands Ben a baby wipe
Kudos to information sharing though!
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
As you guys know, after much
-To: NT Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:55:24 +
To: NT Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
Hehehehehe. I didn’t
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote:
hands Ben a baby wipe
You've got something on your lips..
Amusing, but I really do mean it. Computers currently involve way
too much tribal knowledge and not-invented-here and
everyone-doing-something-different and
I know you meant it and you are correct. Still couldn't help poking fun at
you!! :D
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote:
hands Ben a baby wipe
You've got something on your lips..
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote:
I know you meant it and you are correct. Still couldn't help poking fun at
you!! :D
I'm glad I could serve some purpose. ;-)
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
As you guys know, after much gnashing on this list I was finally able to get
SAML working with ADFS. What took too-many hours of banging on it can know be
done soup-to-nuts (including building a server OS from scratch - just to make
sure I have the steps right) in two hours.
There were a
:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
As you guys know, after much gnashing on this list I was finally able to get
SAML working with ADFS. What took too-many hours of banging on it can
know be done soup-to-nuts (including building a server OS from
If I had a blog, I would. My internal document is far more detailed :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 11:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
Now write that up
= success!
If I had a blog, I would. My internal document is far more detailed :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 11:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
Now write
, January 16, 2012 2:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
If I had a blog, I would. My internal document is far more detailed :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com
as s guest author.
Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from ATT
-Original Message-
From: David Lum david@nwea.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 2:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success
That settles that, you will have it by this time tomorrow!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
Happy to feature you as s guest
= success!
That settles that, you will have it by this time tomorrow!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
Happy
Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
That settles that, you will have it by this time tomorrow!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success
I want to know this myself. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success
tripped me up so
looking back now I can see how it took 40-ish hours to get it right.
Dave
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ADFS + SAML 2.0 w/ Concur = success!
I want to know this myself. :)
Regards
28 matches
Mail list logo
