http://www.securitynewsportal.com/cgi-bin/news555.cgi?target=A/505643969?-2622securitynews=Searching%20for%20Google%20Chrome%20on%20Bing%20Leads%20to%20Malware
--
On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?'
Fantastic disclaimer. Do you know Dave Barry...?
James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com 7/11/2011 8:53 AM
http://www.securitynewsportal.com/cgi-bin/news555.cgi?target=A/505643969?-2622securitynews=Searching%20for%20Google%20Chrome%20on%20Bing%20Leads%20to%20Malware
--
On two occasions...I have
I don't, but having just Googled him, I have just realised that all the
material in the book that I am writing (currently eight years of work, and
counting) is probably pretty unoriginal. :-(
On 11 July 2011 14:00, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Fantastic disclaimer. Do you know Dave
Dave Barry is one funny guy.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:04 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't, but having just Googled him, I have just realised that all the
material in the book that I am writing (currently eight years of work, and
counting) is probably pretty unoriginal.
James, you should also look up the late Lewis Grizzard. He was absolutely
hilarious.
Webster
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Subject: Re: Some amusing search engine poisoning
I don't, but having just Googled him, I have just realised that all the
material
** **
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Subject:* Re: Some amusing search engine poisoning
** **
I don't, but having just Googled him, I have just realised that all the
material in the book that I am writing (currently eight years of work, and
counting) is probably pretty
amusing search engine poisoning
** **
I don't, but having just Googled him, I have just realised that all the
material in the book that I am writing (currently eight years of work, and
counting) is probably pretty unoriginal. :-(
On 11 July 2011 14:00, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote
Well I have lost all faith in the justice system. This guy won his case for
unfair dismissal. He is now awaiting compensation.
On 1 July 2011 14:58, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the
Internet. He is defending
Which part of the justice system failed here?
* *
*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:02 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well I have lost all faith in the justice system. This guy won
Maybe I should have said the legal systembut clearly whoever sits on
these tribunals must have been taken in by this guy's nonsensical verbiage.
Either that or our solicitors are useless.
Basically this guy was placed under suspension and investigated for spending
all day on his blog instead
Who was the expert witness?
* *
*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:48 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Maybe I should have said the legal systembut clearly whoever sits on
these
Not me :-) one of the guys from our networks team, who I haven't bumped
into yet
On 8 July 2011 13:20, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Who was the expert witness?
* *
*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On
Really? He won? I sincerely hope it wasn't based on that technical nonsense
he spewed.
is your employer At wil ?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:28 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Not me :-) one of the guys from our networks team, who I haven't bumped
into yet
On 8 July 2011
At Will -- apologies.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Harry Singh hbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Really? He won? I sincerely hope it wasn't based on that technical nonsense
he spewed.
is your employer At wil ?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:28 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.comwrote:
Not me
...@fiserv.com
Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673
Fax: 610-233-0404
www.fiserv.com http://www.fiserv.com/
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Amusing legal stuff
Maybe I should have said the legal system
www.fiserv.com
** **
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2011 7:48 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: OT: Amusing legal stuff
** **
Maybe I should have said the legal systembut clearly whoever sits on
these tribunals must have
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Amusing legal stuff
Constructive dismissali.e. he claims he was put in a position where
he had no choice but to resign.
On 8 July 2011 15:41, Guyer, Don don.gu...@fiserv.com wrote:
How can one resign and then turn around and claim dismissal
:401-639-3505
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Amusing legal stuff
I'm sorry; I have a big problem with that. It's Friday, I'm gonna
refrain from ranting over that, so I don't ruin my weekend
Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Amusing legal stuff
I?m sorry; I have a big problem with that. It?s Friday, I?m gonna
refrain from ranting over that, so I don?t ruin my weekend?..
J
I?ll just say I have no tolerance for people that ?misbehave? and
then pull a redirect, blaming it on someone
...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Amusing legal stuff Constructive dismissali.e. he claims
he was put in a position where he had no choice but to resign.On 8 July 2011
15:41, Guyer, Don don.gu...@fiserv.com wrote:How can one
...@fiserv.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2011 10:59 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: OT: Amusing legal stuff
** **
I’m sorry; I have a big problem with that. It’s Friday, I’m gonna refrain
from ranting over that, so I don’t ruin my weekend…..
** **
J
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the
Internet. He is defending himself, and some of the points he has risen truly
make me aware of the fact a little knowledge is a dangerous thing...
He claims that, since he uses Firefox, and Microsoft ISA Server is, in his
words,
Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Amusing legal stuff
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the Internet.
He is defending himself, and some of the points he has risen truly make me
aware of the fact a little knowledge is a dangerous thing...
He claims that, since he uses Firefox
The guy obviously does not use the same sig file as you. Then again,
perhaps that last part of the sig file hints at the nature of the
disciplinary action.
--
richard
James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 07/01/2011 08:58:31 AM:
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for
depends on what the definition of 'is' is
what a TOOL !
I say if he can provide empirical evidence or even officially recorded
precedence he should be set free, otherwise DOUBLE his punishment as a
bullsh*t penalty !!!
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
It should be easy enough to dispute all his lovely findings, observations
and assertions by (a) asking him to substantiate any of his statements using
third party data, and (b) pointing out that all of these timings are based
on network activity - at the network device itself - and thus not at all
We had to discipline someone because they surfed a non-adult related site.
Not kidding.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Amusing legal stuff
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action
System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Amusing legal stuff
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the
Internet. He is defending himself, and some of the points he has risen truly
make me aware of the fact a little knowledge is a dangerous thing...
He claims that, since he uses
Check his email address, it will all make perfect sense.
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Disciplined for NOT surfing pr0n?
Wow, that's harsh :P
a non-adult related
site.
Not kidding.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Amusing legal stuff
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the
Internet. He is defending himself
, 2011 7:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Amusing legal stuff
depends on what the definition of 'is' is
what a TOOL !
I say if he can provide empirical evidence or even officially recorded
precedence he should be set free, otherwise DOUBLE his punishment as a bullsh*t
-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Disciplined for NOT surfing pr0n?
Wow, that's harsh :P
Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com 7/1/2011 8:23 AM
We had to discipline someone because
can’t possibly be guilty of malfeasance, I use a Mac, it’s all that
Microsoft stuff causing me to appear to be a slacker!”
** **
** **
** **
*From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 01, 2011 7:19 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: OT: Amusing
that
Microsoft stuff causing me to appear to be a slacker!”
** **
** **
** **
*From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 01, 2011 7:19 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: OT: Amusing legal stuff
** **
depends on what the definition
Issues
Subject: OT: Amusing legal stuff
We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the
Internet. He is defending himself, and some of the points he has risen
truly
make me aware of the fact a little knowledge is a dangerous thing...
He claims that, since he uses Firefox
Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Are you hiring? :)
Op 1 jul. 2011 17:26 schreef Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com het
volgende:
We had to discipline someone because they surfed
pun intended?
From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 4:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Amen. You need someone to browse pr0n all day, its a tough job, but I am
up to the challenge.
Sent from my POS
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: RE: Amusing legal stuff
pun intended?
From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 4:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Amen. You
-
From: Rene de Haas rene.deh...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:54:33
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject:
Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Are you hiring? :)
Op 1 jul. 2011 17:26 schreef
Depends on your talents.
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:rene.deh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Are you hiring? :)
Op 1 jul. 2011 17:26 schreef Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com het
volgende:
We had
.
From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 1:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Amen. You need someone to browse pr0n all day, its a tough job, but I am up
to the challenge.
Sent from my POS BlackBerry wireless
Gives new meaning to employee training.
From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 5:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RE: Amusing legal stuff
Depends on your talents.
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:rene.deh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01
:03 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: RE: Amusing legal stuff
** **
Amen. You need someone to browse pr0n all day, its a tough job, but I am up
to the challenge.
Sent from my POS BlackBerry wireless device, which may wipe itself at any
moment
Who was actually paraphrasing Pauly.
;)
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I've said it before.
To paraphrase Henry Hill in Goodfellas F you, pay me.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at
:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
The general plan here is to improve performance when you have large mailboxes.
Most, but not all (granted) folks would say that it's OK to use more disk
space if that effectively removes a key performance blocker.
SIS was designed
If so, that's not what we've been told...
From: Ken Schaefer [...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 9:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
So this doesn't have anything to do with a tricky bit of code that requires
constant
: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 8:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
The statement was:
Who says what's right, though? That brings us back to trying to force humans
to adapt to technology rather than designing technology for the way
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
You can continue to use Exchange as a filesystem.
That's your answer to everything. Too many mass emails? We're
using it wrong. Too many old emails? We're using it wrong. Too many
attachments? We're using it
]
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 12:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
You can continue to use Exchange as a filesystem.
That's your answer to everything. Too many mass emails? We're
using it wrong
customers want very performant very large
mailboxes. Microsoft is making the necessary changes to meet that desire.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 8:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
On Fri, May 29, 2009
as
fast, easy, and reliable as the USB key is for them.
John
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I think when employee behavior compromises the ability to maintain a stable
network
[mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I agree-but in this context, we weren't talking about behavior that was
compromising network stability or organizational security.
In the case you give, we as IT pros need to look
[mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
*Sent:* Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:22 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Amusing
I agree—but in this context, we weren’t talking about behavior that was
compromising network stability or organizational security.
In the case you give, we
that they will readily accept.
Ralph
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 12:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I was being (somewhat) facetious.
Menus? Do you guys do intranet
Good, good... we agree that some things are indeed 'wrong from a
corporate perspective.
Apology accepted.
-sc
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 9:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
As IT professionals, we
That's why we need minions!
-sc
From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
Not really. I am basically a 1 person IT department with 1 other person
helping me with PC maintenance, for 200
30, 2009 12:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
Not really. I am basically a 1 person IT department with 1 other person
helping me with PC maintenance, for 200 users at 10 locations, so I have a long
list of things I want to /need to/ should do, but am very short on the time
:* Saturday, May 30, 2009 9:47 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Amusing
As IT professionals, we are resposible for all facets of technology in the
enterprise. User interaction with technoogy is but one part of the
equation. For example you mentioned USB keys and the VPN. USB based
It's all good.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 6:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
1) I wasn't really involved in this thread.
2) I certainly didn't say anything to you directly that would've
required an apology, I
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
Companies are seldom democracies, and as I think both scenarios
illustrate, there indeed can be a wrong.
The thing is, in this case, It's not an internal policy decision.
It's Microsoft that's the dictator, and
I've said it before.
To paraphrase Henry Hill in Goodfellas F you, pay me.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
Companies are seldom democracies, and as I think both scenarios
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 8:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
Companies are seldom democracies, and as I think both
by disrupting the network.
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
+1 brother. Ready for school to be out?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
OK so before we go down the Exchange 2010 sucks because I think I need single
instance [attachment] storage route, let's look at some other new stuff:
-- Threaded conversation view (ala GMAIL) in Outlook Web Access
-- Substantial filtering choices in Outlook
[mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov]
Sent: 28 May 2009 19:53
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I started a war. I just thought sending a 9 meg file to 3000 people was funny.
:)
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:51 PM
Hornbuckle [john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Friday, 29 May 2009 8:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I don't think anyone thinks Ex 2010 sucks; it has a number of exciting new
features. I just think that for some (many?) shops, the SIS issue could have a
significant negative
...@pfsf.org]
*Sent:* Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:53 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Amusing
+1 brother. Ready for school to be out?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
So what is MS' reason for getting rid of SIS? Perhaps another attempt to
convince people to use Sharepoint?
From: br...@briandesmond.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Amusing
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:50:57 +
Almost.
SIS is per database. So
Never mind, Brian. (I gotta start reading the entire thread before replying to
any particular post. And thanks for the explanation.
From: pdw1...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Amusing
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:18:59 -0400
So what is MS' reason
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:21 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Just make sure it's not RAID 5:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162
His point seems to be that if you have a single disk failure, the
system needs to read all the other disks to reconstruct the failed
-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
Hi,
Deploy Sharepoint, and email links instead. :-)
But as Brian has mentioned - it's working checking your actual SIS stats. I
agree with what he has said - many
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
I presume the database takes pains to store these several tables for
each mailbox together on disk?
[Brian Desmond] Yes. Online maintenance has been entirely rethought to ensure
this.
Well, that's certainly a
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
OK so before we go down the Exchange 2010 sucks because I think I
need single instance [attachment] storage route, let's look at some
other new stuff:
I'm not saying Exchange 2010 doesn't bring anything to the
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Deploy Sharepoint, and email links instead. :-)
SharePoint may well be the most overrated product in the history of
Microsoft. I can tell people to email links to files on the file
server just as easily. The problem
Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
They want to use email the way they want
. Did MS miss the green
bus here? There's public relations gold in being able to advertise green.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM
Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Deploy Sharepoint, and email links instead. :-)
SharePoint may well be the most overrated product in the history of
Microsoft. I can tell people to email links to files on the file
server just
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
This says so much right here... It's a common trap IT people fall into. We tell
people that the way they want to use the technology isn't the right way to use
it.
Huh? Why not? Technology exists to serve humans--not vice versa.
I agree that e-mail
: Amusing
Ill have to ponder that one a bit. Not sure I like it. Disks may be cheap, but
eliminating SIS would cause storage requirements to increase by an order of
magnitude. The OPs situation is a prime example
Suddenly a 9 MB storage
requirement becomes 2.7 GB storage requirement (if my
of subsequent tweaking,
I'm sure we'll not want to go back to what we had before.
Cheers
Ken
From: Carl Houseman [c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 29 May 2009 11:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I have to agree. What's the harm
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf counter you won't see anything
near a 10x reduction.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf counter you won't see anything
near a 10x reduction.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: John
multiplied times 500 mailboxes, add up to a lot of
storage space if a deduplication mechanism isn't used.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I agree in general.
But I
Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
The harm might be increased CPU or memory usage, reduced scalability etc.
Whilst you can quantify some direct benefits (more disks), I assume that
most
counters who are already projecting savings from reduced
staffing.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
The harm might be increased CPU or memory usage, reduced
, 29 May 2009 11:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
As for memory/CPU, does eliminating SIS mean lower RAM or slower CPU
requirements for the product? Doubtful. The thing they're eliminating is a
bunch of tricky code the programmers don't like and which needs a lot of
regression
a major factor in the decision, with a nod
from the bean counters who are already projecting savings from reduced
staffing.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf counter you won't see anything
near a 10x reduction.
-sc
-Original Message
14.5 for 200 users.
From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:robbonfig...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
5.25 for roughly 350 users.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Mazzaccaro
david.mazzacc
Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
I agree with several others that said just because you can don't make it right.
I have one user whinning that wants to store EVERYTHING in his Exchange
mailbox. His box is 1 GB at the moment and he has been hinting that he might
like to have more. I only get
Of course.
--
ME2
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, paul chinnery pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:
So what is MS' reason for getting rid of SIS? Perhaps another attempt to
convince people to use Sharepoint?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
?
http://www.pcworld.com/article/164946/google_outage_lesson_dont_get_stuck_in
_a_cloud.html
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
The thing they're
:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
If I'm wrong, I welcome an informed source to say so and reveal the complete
and unfiltered decision process for why a working feature with positive
benefits to many was removed. Not that that would ever happen of course,
because
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
As for memory/CPU, does eliminating SIS mean lower RAM or slower CPU
requirements for the product? Doubtful.
Someone already explained that Exchange 2010 moves from a single set
of tables for all mailboxes, to a
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jim Mediger j...@holaday.com wrote:
“Disk space savings from single instance storage are transient and drop off
very quickly over time.”
I believe that is misleading at best. It may even be deliberate
propaganda to justify removing SIS. We've had several
Wouldn't it have been nice that MS had done product research and created a
traditional upgrade keeping SIS, and then released a Datacenter Edition
for large scales of server farms/user bases which didn't have SIS?
I wonder what percentage of revenue is the small to medium business market
compared
SIS Ratio = 65 - 2400 mailboxes
- Sean
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jim Mediger j...@holaday.com wrote:
“Disk space savings from single instance storage are transient and drop
off
very quickly over time.”
I
perfmon counter before this
post.
Id' be interested to see what others are reporting
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf
System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
2.1, for about 250 mailboxes.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:36, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Mine is about 1.7 for 500 users on EX2007
2009/5/29 David Mazzaccaro david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com
Mine is at 40. (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never
]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing
Mine is about 1.7 for 500 users on EX2007
2009/5/29 David Mazzaccaro david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com
Mine is at 40. (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never thought to look at this particular perfmon counter before
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
