FYI.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/09/12/important-changes-to-forefront-product-roadmaps.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Nice to see that UAG has been left alone, I think.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
FYI.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/09/12/important-changes-to-forefront-product-roadmaps.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and
I'm still waiting to see if TMGs functionality will be rolled into UAG.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront roadmap changes
Nice to see that UAG has been left alone
[mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront roadmap changes
Nice to see that UAG has been left alone, I think.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
wrote:
FYI.
http
Oh really? Interesting. I'm pretty unfamiliar with UAG, having vever run it.
But, yeah that sounds likely.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Kurt Buff
Sent: 9/12/2012 2:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront roadmap changes
I'm going to guess
I anticipate that UAG will continue development and enhancement. But right now,
it's not on par with TMG.
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 4:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
Oh really? Interesting
than an iPhone launch day
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
I anticipate that UAG will continue development and enhancement. But right now,
it's not on par with TMG
That's what I figured, but if UAG requires TMG, isn't it, by definition, an add
on, and therefore would have no feature overlap?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
I
the changes
from TMG to UAG. I have no idea if that is true or not. But at least currently,
that has not happened.
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
That's what I figured
Yeah, well, TMG and on-premises Forefront for Exchange are the biggest losses
IMO.
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
Mary Jo Foley's take.
http://www.zdnet.com
: Forefront roadmap changes
Yeah, well, TMG and on-premises Forefront for Exchange are the biggest losses
IMO.
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
Mary Jo Foley’s take.
http
increase to re-add something like WebSense.
I was quite happy when that functionality was added to TMG.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
Yeah, well, TMG and on-premises
[mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront roadmap changes
So much for the purchase/demise of Sybari.
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Michael B. Smith
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
We're about waist deep in a migration to O365, so I'm not too upset about
losing Forefront for Exchange and even if we stayed in-house, I like that its
just built in in 2013.
However, if we lose TMG and the accompanying website filtering
:* Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:12 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Forefront roadmap changes
** **
So much for the purchase/demise of Sybari.
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
*From*: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich
HAH.
That’s ok. I’m just conservative.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
- George Santayana
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront roadmap changes
We can
: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront roadmap changes
So much for the purchase/demise of Sybari.
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Michael B. Smith
Ahh.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes
NO. Only single engine (basic) scanning is built into Exchange 2013 and the
capabilities of the single engine and associated
18 matches
Mail list logo
