RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-08-09 Thread RichardMcClary
[image removed] Alex From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives You?re right. The best approach is to make a decision based on what you want

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-08-05 Thread andy
all data is used to indicate what you want it to show. At 09:52 PM 7/29/2010, Ralph Smith wrote: Willlburrr!... -- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-08-05 Thread Ralph Smith
From: andy [mailto:afo...@psu.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives all data is used to indicate what you want it to show. At 09:52 PM 7/29/2010, Ralph Smith wrote: Willlburrr

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-08-02 Thread Steven Calvanese
: RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives I can understand FP's against lesser used applications, but when part of Windows or a commonly installed MS product is tagged, there's no real excuse for that IMHO. Still, I've asked Alex to provide any comparison data he can come up

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-07-30 Thread David Lum
As I have stated in previous AV threads, I actually use/manage 3 different AV products: Vipre Enterprise (3 clients, ~25 systems, plus my home machines), Trend WorryFree (1 client, 55 systems) and McAfee (%dayjob%, ~500 systems) and Vipre easily has more false positives than the other two: 3

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-07-30 Thread Carl Houseman
and convincing, I may put forth Vipre as an alternative. Thanks everybody for all the feedback. Carl From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 2:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives As I have stated in previous

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-07-29 Thread Michael B. Smith
Not if his name is Mr. Ed. :-) Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from ATT From: Ralph Smith m...@gatewayindustries.org Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Vipre effectiveness

Re: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-07-29 Thread Richard Stovall
Great (and terribly bored) minds think alike, I suppose. :-) On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote: Not if his name is Mr. Ed. :-) Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from ATT -- From: Ralph Smith

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-07-29 Thread Michael B. Smith
: Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives Great (and terribly bored) minds think alike, I suppose. :-) On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Michael B. Smith

RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives

2010-07-29 Thread Ralph Smith
Willlburrr!... From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Vipre effectiveness false positives Not if his name is Mr. Ed. :-) Sent from my HTC Tilt(tm) 2, a Windows(r