On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
So ideally in your opinion the firewall would effectively give
each VLAN (each VLAN defined by 802.1Q tags) it's own
DHCP scope and thus their own IP settings, correct?
More or less.
I would separate your desired access
off with this little project.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 5:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
So
don't?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
Yep, what you describe is exactly what I was envisioning, thanks! (BTW Dell
also calls it tagging). Now
thought you'd use but really don't?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
Yep, what you describe is exactly what I was envisioning, thanks
but really don't?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
Yep, what you describe is exactly what I was envisioning, thanks! (BTW Dell
also calls
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you least important criteria of all
on a FW? Or that's it's the bottom of your must haves?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b
Have any of you guys checked out Palo Alto Networks?
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you least important
, August 04, 2011 3:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you least important criteria of
all on a FW? Or that's it's the bottom of your must haves?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent
of you guys checked out Palo Alto Networks?
** **
*From:* Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:18 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
** **
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you
is
going to pay off with this little project.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 5:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, David Lum david
gotcha
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
It's the feature that my clients tend to use/implement the least frequently on
a UTM device.
ASB
http://about.me
Same here. Other than that they are awesome.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
Yes. Have two PAs clustered. Love the security aspect
the documentation is on the Juniper website but as with most firewall
vendors it's like 2000 pages so can be a bit heavy going.
Paul
From: David Lum [david@nwea.org]
Sent: 03 August 2011 8:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b
Don't know, but here's what I've got running.
We're using Cisco 1240AG WAPs, but I think the situation is analagous.
I made sure that our firewall's internal interface had two VLANs that didn't
talk with each other, but that each had access to the Internet - each VLAN
interface is a different
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Use the Dell switch, have the firewall be promiscuous and VLAN off the
various ports so they can only see the firewall as well as get DHCP from it.
I would tend to prefer to keep IP traffic completely separated --
different
Also look at the Fortigate 50 series...
* *
*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Nice, looks like the SSG5 fits the bill. Looks like Watchguard XTM2 lives
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 13:20, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Use the Dell switch, have the firewall be promiscuous and VLAN off the
various ports so they can only see the firewall as well as get DHCP from it.
I
: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b)
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Use the Dell switch, have the firewall be promiscuous and VLAN off
18 matches
Mail list logo
