Best of luck. Let us know the results.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Thanks Steven, I am very impressed so far. Their documentation is top
Admin Issues
Cc: Sam Cayze
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Best of luck. Let us know the results.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Thanks Steven, I
that using another product like websense.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Steve, the Fortinet 60B looks perfect, I like the PC Card for EVDO card
12, 2009 12:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
There are a number of options - you will need to talk with a sales rep.
When I evaluated multiple different firewalls (sonicwall, fortinet,
firebox, etc) the FG came out on top.The FG folks got me a an eval unit,
and I fell
, March 06, 2009 3:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Try using Fortigate units (even the 60bs) from fortinet. I love them.
They work well, and the site to site is great. I am running a few
offices off of them. Including VoIP. Good stuff.
And the interface is pretty
Why spend that when you could do it with a couple ASA's and DSL/Cable
Connections.
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Site to Site VPN?
Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (1800 or
Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally.
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Why spend that when you could do it with a couple ASA's and DSL/Cable
Connections
.
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:23 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally.
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com]
Sent: Friday
...@mortonwelding.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Generally but depending on requirements it could be ok for him. We are running
an offsite warehouse with computers, ip phones, network printers, etc with
Cable at their end and DSL
Actually the reason I need this is because we are getting rid of a mpls site to
site connection...
Thanks for the advice everyone.
-Sam
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Site to
I second the SonicWALL site to site VPN connections. They are 100% better
with support and the wizards do make creating the connections much easier.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near
Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Inviato: venerdì 6 marzo 2009 16.35
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Actually the reason I need this is because we are getting rid of a mpls site to
site connection...
Thanks for the advice everyone
Try using Fortigate units (even the 60bs) from fortinet. I love them.
They work well, and the site to site is great. I am running a few
offices off of them. Including VoIP. Good stuff.
And the interface is pretty easy to use.
From: Sam Cayze
) 766-4185Cell
gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com
www.abideinternational.com
-Original Message-
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 5:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN?
Why spend that when you could do
No experience with that model, but I can say that current SonicWALL
devices are very easy to site-2-site VPN. Their support for me in the
past year has been very easy to deal with.
--
ME2
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
We may be needing a VPN
I just recently asked the list about Site to Site VPN solutions. It's called
Site to Site VPN... What works? Check out them in the archives:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/search/results?forum=ntsysadminwords=Site+to+Site+VPN...+What+works?sb=1
We ended up using IPSec between our two
Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5
minutes to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site
VPN. It was super-easy.
One negative thing that I definately have to throw out there, is that
the CMD line interface (if thats you preference) is
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5 minutes
to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site VPN. It was
super-easy.
One negative
I looked.
I appreciate the input.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5
Well, we're using an ASA and two Pixes here to connect three lans together
if that helps. I'm the IT Manager, but I'm not a Cisco guy. I've got a
vendor who handles all that for us. J There's a Cisco user list that I'm
subscribe to. maybe you'd like to join up on there:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000?
Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different
LinkSys encryption boxes in the past, and they've all sucked.
Inadequate processing
So this was pre-2003? (When Linksys was acquired by Cisco?)
Any good recommendations?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
So this was pre-2003? (When Linksys was acquired by Cisco?)
It between 2001 and 2004. LinkSys might have been acquired by Cisco
during this time span, but Cisco certainly hadn't had a chance to
effect any real change
Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000?
Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different
LinkSys encryption boxes in the past
Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000?
Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different
LinkSys encryption boxes in the past, and they've
My experience is that things have not changed much on that front.
As of last August Linksys gear was still slow and unreliable.
Ben Scott wrote:
It between 2001 and 2004. LinkSys might have been acquired by Cisco
during this time span, but Cisco certainly hadn't had a chance to
effect any
I have a Netscreen 208 at the office and a Netscreen 5 at home to connect to
the office.
I think the Netscreen 5 was around $500. You could get two Netscreen 5s and
set up a VPN for around $1000. Easy to configure. I do not use VOIP with
the VPN set up, so I cannot help you there.
Looks like the Netscreen series is EOL. It is the SSG series now. Price a
little more than $500 now...LOL
-Original Message-
From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
I
The Sonicwalls do work and are pretty simple to setup too, btw.
For free though, I will take a pfsense vm with load balancer. Includes rrd
graphs and bandwidth meters and traffic shaping.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
We have a Cisco 3000 Concentrator at one end and a Cisco 3002 Hardware
Client at the other end. Was easy to setup and haven't had any problems
with the tunnel dropping. Although, won't be able to get it for under
$1,000. Could try looking for used Cisco equipment and try that.
Another thing you can try is ClarkConnect. They provide a firewall,
content filtering, vpn and the list continues. You can use the free
version or pay for a license, which only cost us around $160 for one
license.
___
Cameron Cooper
IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified
, February 26, 2009 7:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
We have a Cisco 3000 Concentrator at one end and a Cisco 3002 Hardware
Client at the other end. Was easy to setup and haven't had any problems
with the tunnel dropping. Although, won't be able to get
...@dpsciences.com
http://www.dpsciences.com/
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?
+1 on this. I've benchmarked the linksys WRT54G against
+1, although I will admit to being a Cisco bigot along with Aaron.
Shook
-Original Message-
From: Rohyans, Aaron [mailto:arohy...@dpsciences.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
Cisco ASA 5505 @ $350
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
+1, although I will admit to being a Cisco bigot along with Aaron.
Shook
-Original Message-
From: Rohyans, Aaron [mailto:arohy...@dpsciences.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject
On 25 Feb 2009 at 15:33, Matthew W. Ross wrote:
Greetings List,
I've got a small lab of computers offsite. I want to be able to access them
for support from HQ. While dail-in style VPN works okay, I'm thinking of
getting a real site-to-site network solution working. I do want all traffic
IPSec is a suite of protocols, which are implemented by various
vendors, in varying degrees of quality. When you said you tried IPSec,
what do you mean by that?
I'd also like to know what your issues were with OpenVPN, as it's
something I'd like to try at some point myself.
Anyway, check out the
issues do you have with it?
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Buff
[mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Wed, 25 Feb 2009
16:16:05 -0800
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works
Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?
I re-read my post, yeah, I left some details out:
I tried linux hosted OpenVPN and IPSec with varying degrees
Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Wed, 25 Feb 2009
16:16:05 -0800
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?
IPSec is a suite of protocols, which are implemented by various
vendors, in varying degrees of quality. When you said you tried IPSec,
what do you mean
+1 pfsense is rock solid IMO
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
Check out pfSense (www.pfsense.org) - I've had fantastic success
I user Fortinet SOHO units for some small offices on cable modem needing
site-to-site VPN to our HQ units. They should speak to other non-Fortinet
firewalls just fine since your HQ unit probably isn't Fortinet. They are I
think $300- $600 depending on the model and options. The Fortinet
You looking to setup a vpn tunnel to only one other location ?
You could for very low cost use a couple of NetGear FVS firewalls and just
have routing tables for each side point to the Netgear for the gateway to
the other network... Probably less than 30 minutes setup
Erik Goldoff
IT
SonicWALL TZ 180 - US $340 via NewEgg
Cisco 851 - US $250 (not for the faint of heart, IMO the web interface
is worthless)
Cisco 1711 - under US $100 on eBay - again, not for the faint of heart
Old PIII PC with 2 NICs and m0n0wall
Matthew W. Ross wrote:
1. Cheap, as in less than $1000. 2. Easy
Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?
SonicWALL TZ 180 - US $340 via NewEgg
Cisco 851 - US $250 (not for the faint of heart, IMO the web interface
is worthless)
Cisco 1711 - under US $100 on eBay - again, not for the faint of heart
Old PIII PC with 2 NICs and m0n0wall
Matthew W
I don't know if I would go that route, just on a basis of CPU horsepower.
Most of the options I listed have either hardware cryptographic
accelerators or enough horsepower to do it in software.
The Linksys WRT54G(L) boxes have very, very weak CPUs and do not possess
the necessary hardware
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
+1 on the SonicWALL.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?
SonicWALL TZ 180 - US $340 via NewEgg
Cisco 851 - US $250 (not for the faint of heart, IMO the web interface
is worthless)
Cisco 1711 - under US $100 on eBay - again, not for the faint of heart
Old PIII PC with 2 NICs and m0n0wall
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
+1 on the SonicWALL.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?
+1 on the SonicWALL.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com
:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive/index.php/t-242584.html
-Derek
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?
I don't know if I would go
+1 on this. I've benchmarked the linksys WRT54G against other
comparible models before, it it rated at the bottom of the list when
depending on hardware encryption performance.
I like it as a home routing device, but I dont recommend it for
site-to-site when performance needs to be maximized.
if the Site A machines don't use their local VPN device as their gateway
why NOT use the VPN tunnel device as default gateway? sounds like that what
you want
_
From: Adam Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 7:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
9:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing
if the Site A machines don't use their local VPN device as their
gateway
why NOT use the VPN tunnel device as default gateway? sounds like that
what you want
From: Adam
Proxy servers are typically not gateways, as they run on the application layer.
Give each site its own subnet and set appropriate routing, then just
set the proxy in your browser properties via GPO for your users.
--Durf
On 9/12/08, Adam Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to
You might also want to look into the Hub Network feature of the VPN tunnel,
much more secure since all traffic from your branch office will route through
the tunnel and out your central office WAN.
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Short answer yes but what are you driving at? If you implement a
site-to-site, you have to tell the firewalls to forward the traffic
destined for the other site directly to the other firewall, via the
tunnel or it will use its default route to the Internet.
What type of firewalls are you
Sounds like a pretty vague question... any more details available?
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: site-to-site VPN question
When you implement a site-to-site VPN
No
Standard IPsec VPNs use IP subnet(s) defined in the SA (security
association) to determine which packet goes where.
Joe Heaton wrote:
When you implement a site-to-site VPN between firewalls, does this
affect routes?
--
Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~ Upgrade to Next Generation
59 matches
Mail list logo
