RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-03 Thread Ziots, Edward
...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB If you're setting it up for internal use only no, no REAL gotcha's. 2008 R2 license servers don't

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-03 Thread David Lum
System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Right now here is what I got. A Windows 2008 R2 DC as the Terminal Server Licensing Server ( 100 Per-Device CALS). 2 Windows 2008 SP2 Terminal Servers, which will become the TS APP servers for this application. I am assuming all

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-02 Thread Paul Everett
I hope after all the poking was done you realize that you cannot use WLB for your Terminal Servers since they are not Enterprise Ed. Paul From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 2003

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-02 Thread Webster
Not true. NLB is available with all editions of Server 2003. You have to be using the Enterprise edition if you want to use the Session Directory. Webster From: Paul Everett [mailto:evere...@leementalhealth.org] Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB I hope after all

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-02 Thread David Lum
[mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Not true. NLB is available with all editions of Server 2003. You have to be using the Enterprise edition if you want to use the Session Directory

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-02 Thread Ziots, Edward
@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Until 2008 R2...because now you get it with Std edition (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd560675(WS.10).aspx). It's now called Remote Desktop Connection

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-02 Thread David Lum
. Also run the Best Practice Analyzer for each role and recheck as you go along. Dave From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Just a question on the RDS install, any gotchas

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-02 Thread Webster
: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB If you're setting it up for internal use only no, no REAL gotcha's. 2008 R2 license servers don't need to be on a DC for other R2 RDS servers to find them either. My R2 license server is on a Session Host system and when I ran the license tool on the other

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread Webster
Let me get out my microscope to read your e-mail! http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2004/11/29/how-to-confi gure-windows-network-load-balancing-for-pure-terminal-server-environments.as px Or better yet, http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=terminal+server+2003+nlb and your first

Re: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread MarvinC
Is storage shared between the two servers? Two-node cluster maybe but quorum and shared storage are among the initial cluster requirements. On Dec 1, 2010 9:20 AM, Robert Jackson r...@walkermartyn.co.uk wrote: We currently have a couple of identical Windows Server 2003 R2 (Std x64 Edition SP2)

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread Martin Blackstone
My eyes!! From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 6:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB We currently have a couple of identical Windows Server 2003 R2 (Std x64 Edition SP2) running Terminal Services

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread Robert Jackson
: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Is storage shared between the two servers? Two-node cluster maybe but quorum and shared storage are among the initial cluster requirements. On Dec 1, 2010 9:20 AM, Robert Jackson r...@walkermartyn.co.uk wrote: We currently have a couple of identical

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread Robert Jackson
Are they bleedingJ From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday 01 December 2010 15:14 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB My eyes!! From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 01

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread Webster
Folder Redirection and Home Folders are a must in a TS/Ctx environment. Some kind of profile mgmt. is necessary also. Webster From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk] Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Good point. Hadn't thought about any kind of My

RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB

2010-12-01 Thread Webster
No, we are having to use a microscope to read your font size. I think your font size choice is measured in microns instead of points. Webster From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk] Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Terminal Services NLB Are they bleedingJ From: Martin