RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-17 Thread Ken Cornetet
: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs Given the business situation, it would seem that you have the choice between the following: -- Upgrading to 2008R2, and not authenticating

Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-17 Thread Andrew S. Baker
] *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:24 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs ** ** Given the business situation, it would seem that you have the choice between the following: -- Upgrading to 2008R2, and not authenticating the Win95 systems

RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Guyer, Don
Do they have to auth against the domain? Don Guyer Windows Systems Engineer RIM Operations Engineering Distributed - A Team, Tier 2 Enterprise Technology Group Fiserv don.gu...@fiserv.com Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673 Fax: 610-233-0404 www.fiserv.com http://www.fiserv.com/

RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Ken Cornetet
812.482.8499 To err is human - to moo, bovine. From: Guyer, Don [mailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs Do they have to auth against the domain? Don Guyer Windows Systems Engineer RIM Operations

Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Kurt Buff
Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs ** ** Do they “have to” auth against the domain? ** ** *Don Guyer* Windows Systems Engineer RIM Operations Engineering Distributed – A Team, Tier 2 Enterprise Technology Group *Fiserv* don.gu

RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Guyer, Don
://www.fiserv.com/ From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs It is preferable to have them authenticate to the domain, but I might be able to convince them

Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Andrew S. Baker
Given the business situation, it would seem that you have the choice between the following: -- Upgrading to 2008R2, and not authenticating the Win95 systems at all (as it is not supported) - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954387 -- Leaving the Win2K3 DCs in place * * *ASB*

Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread kz20fl
at any moment -Original Message- From: Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:24:28 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Andrew S. Baker
-- *From: * Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com *Date: *Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:24:28 -0400 *To: *NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *ReplyTo: * NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *Subject: *Re: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs Given

RE: WIndows 95 and Server 2008 R2 DCs

2011-08-16 Thread Ralph Smith
Could you P2V one of the Win95 machines and install the AD client extension on it as a test to see if it works? Back when I had Win 95 machines on a 2003 domain I ended up installing it on all the win9x machines with good success. Alternately, and this is kind of a kludgey (is that a word?),

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Parker
or action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 August 2010 03:27 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Richard Stovall

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Jim Holmgren
) 443.524.8573 (direct) 443-506.2400 (cell) www.xlhealth.com -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread RichardMcClary
You make a grown man cry! Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote on 08/25/2010 03:55:34 PM: Hey for all of you who missed this like me, Happy Belated Birthday to Windows 95. It turned 15 yesterday. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Nope. I still have one machine that's running it only because I have just one application that refuses to run on anything else. *sigh*. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 4:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. I

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Maglinger, Paul
You don't happen to work around the Chicago area do you? I just heard a similar story from my brother-in-law. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed, Aug 25

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Egads. For all the kludge it was under the covers... it is what introduced the Win32 API to the masses, and ultimately paved the way for XP which unified the Windows families on the NT kernel codebase... I wonder if I still have my copy of Andrew Schulman's Windows 95 Undocumented

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Andy Shook
I wonder if anybody cares Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Egads. For all the kludge it was under the covers... it is what introduced the Win32 API to the masses

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread RichardMcClary
You make a grown man cry! Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote on 08/26/2010 08:02:33 AM: I wonder if anybody cares?. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Egads

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Steven M. Caesare
: Re: Windows 95. You make a grown man cry! Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote on 08/25/2010 03:55:34 PM: Hey for all of you who missed this like me, Happy Belated Birthday to Windows 95. It turned 15 yesterday. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Don Guyer
mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Egads. For all the kludge it was under the covers... it is what introduced the Win32 API to the masses, and ultimately

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: Until a few months ago, we had a measurement system in production that was still running Win 3.x. ... Then a few months ago the interface board died. You don't happen to work around the Chicago area do you?  I just

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Webster
That leaves Shooky Baby out of this then. J Webster From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org] Subject: Re: Windows 95. You make a grown man cry! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Don't hate just because technical talk scares you. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. I wonder if anybody cares Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Steven M. Caesare
It's because Shooky doesn't reciprocate. -sc From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. You make a grown man cry! Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote on 08/26/2010

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Andy Shook
Hey! I can talk mega-rams and 1.21 gigawatts as good as anyone. You're mean. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Don't hate just because technical talk scares you. -sc From

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Steven M. Caesare
And you're average. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Hey! I can talk mega-rams and 1.21 gigawatts as good as anyone. You're mean. Shook From: Steven M

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Jim Holmgren
But do you have the wi-fi's ? From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Hey! I can talk mega-rams and 1.21 gigawatts as good as anyone. You're mean. Shook From: Steven M

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Richard Stovall
The wi-fi's what? On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Jim Holmgren jholmg...@xlhealth.comwrote: But do you have the wi-fi’s ? *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] *Sent:* Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:29 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Windows 95. Hey! I

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Jim Holmgren
Just the wi-fi's - it is what makes the iPhone4 the best phone. From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. The wi-fi's what? On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Jim Holmgren jholmg

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread John Cook
I don't care From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Just the wi-fi's - it is what makes the iPhone4 the best phone. From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Jim Holmgren
My cat is now homeless. From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. I don't care From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:39 AM To: NT System Admin

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Holstrom, Don
Our old phone system still runs on DOS. I've been sweating this for years... -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Richard Stovall

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread James Rankin
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote: I still have one dinosaur running an app on W9x that won't run on NT-or-newer. Can this be virtualized

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:54 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Good God. I've only got eight 2003 R2 systems left to upgrade, and three XP workstations. IBM mainframe systems are well-known for having programs written in assembler in the 1960s still in production. We PC people

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Terry Dickson
I still have a set or two in the safe across the room, boy do I need to clean that out. From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. I FINALLY let go and just threw out the Win 95 floppies that I

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Don Guyer
431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com From: Terry Dickson [mailto:te...@treasurer.state.ks.us] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Jacob
: Windows 95. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: Until a few months ago, we had a measurement system in production that was still running Win 3.x. ... Then a few months ago the interface board died. You don't happen to work around the Chicago area do

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread John Aldrich
System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Our old phone system still runs on DOS. I've been sweating this for years... -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Phillip Partipilo
not be using LBA for all I know) Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Our voicemail

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Phillip Partipilo p...@psnet.com wrote: Our NEC Electra voicemail system is DOS based. ... I have an image of it, but the bummer is that the mainboard is picky about hard disk size. One thing going for you is that DOS stuff largely didn't care about

RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail

2010-08-26 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
[mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Our voicemail system runs on OS/2. Fortunately, I have an image of the hard drive, should it ever crash. Of course, if the Dialogic boards ever die, we're up a creek

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread John Aldrich
, 2010 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Our NEC Electra voicemail system is DOS based. Not a very large image either. The hard disk is 1.2gb, out of which maybe a hundred megabytes is used. I have an image of it, but the bummer is that the mainboard is picky about hard

RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail

2010-08-26 Thread John Aldrich
[mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail Let me guess... ActiveVoice Repartee? You can still source dialogic boards, by the way... http://www.voxeo.com/dialogic/ Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread tony patton
8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com From: John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Date: 26/08/2010 15:44 Subject:RE: Windows 95. Our voicemail system runs on OS/2. Fortunately, I

RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail

2010-08-26 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail Yep. Repartee indeed. :-) As for the Dialogic cards, yes

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Bob Hartung
-3106 x215 Fax: (608) 835-7399 e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com _ From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:15:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Windows 95. It's dead, Jim -ASB: http

RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail

2010-08-26 Thread John Aldrich
System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail We're running our Repartee on a G1 tower as well. The Optiplex G1 has both ISA and PCI slots. http://support.dell.com/support/systemsinfo/document.aspx?c=usl=ens=hea~f ile=/systems/ddur/specs.htm The voicemail you have actually

RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail

2010-08-26 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 95. Hijack - OS/2 voicemail Nope. I was not aware that it had email

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Andrew S. Baker
Aug 2010 22:15:47 -0500 *Subject:* Re: Windows 95. It's dead, Jim -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Aug 25, 2010 4:55 PM, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote: Hey for all of you who missed this like me, Happy Belated Birthday to Windows 95

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-26 Thread Mike Gill
...@wiscoind.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. Not as dead as you might think. We have (2) Mitsubishi Lasers we purchased within the last 3 years and guess what they use on the controls for these $800,000 machines? Windows 95

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Jonathan Link
I thought it was dead. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.uswrote: Hey for all of you who missed this like me, Happy Belated Birthday to Windows 95. It turned 15 yesterday. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Mike Tavares
it is seems like yesterday that I was invited to the 95 (Chicago) beta. If I remember correctly the first 2 or 3 beta versions were shipped to us on Floppies, and then by the final they were shipping CD's to those of us that could afford cd rom drives. How times have changed. - Original

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 25 Aug 2010 at 17:05, Jonathan Link wrote: I thought it was dead. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote: Hey for all of you who missed this like me, Happy Belated Birthday to Windows 95. It turned 15 yesterday. I still have one

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Jonathan Link
My sympathies. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.comwrote: On 25 Aug 2010 at 17:05, Jonathan Link wrote: I thought it was dead. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote: Hey for all of you who missed this

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Richard Stovall
Wow. Can this be virtualized somehow or other, or are you scavenging eBay even now for parts? On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote: My sympathies. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.comwrote: On 25 Aug 2010 at

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote: I still have one dinosaur running an app on W9x that won't run on NT-or-newer. Can this be virtualized somehow or other, or are you scavenging eBay even now for parts? Until a few months ago, we had a measurement

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Andrew S. Baker
It's dead, Jim -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Aug 25, 2010 4:55 PM, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote: Hey for all of you who missed this like me, Happy Belated Birthday to Windows 95. It turned 15 yesterday. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint

Re: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: It's dead, Jim Damn it, Jim, I'm a sysadmin, not a miracle worker! -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~

RE: Windows 95.

2010-08-25 Thread greg.sweers
25, 2010 10:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 95. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote: I still have one dinosaur running an app on W9x that won't run on NT-or-newer. Can this be virtualized somehow or other, or are you scavenging eBay