Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-02 Thread Kurt Buff
then so they went with SEP   ;) -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt We had ePO - it was one of the driving reasons for us

RE: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-01 Thread Mathew Shember
(another company) but decided against it after hearing the announcement. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt Well, yes, actually

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-01 Thread Kurt Buff
[mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt Well, yes, actually, and they are part of Intel, and have been acquiring companies for themselves - for instance, Secure Computing a few years ago

RE: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-01 Thread Mathew Shember
: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt We had ePO - it was one of the driving reasons for us to abandon it. The other reason was the unreasonable amount of resources the client sucked out of the workstations. Yet another reason was the price - we got VIPRE Enterprise for the renewal price of McAfee

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-01 Thread Kurt Buff
- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt We had ePO - it was one of the driving reasons for us to abandon it. The other reason was the unreasonable amount

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-01 Thread Erik Goldoff
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt We had ePO - it was one of the driving reasons for us to abandon it. The other reason was the unreasonable amount of resources the client sucked out

RE: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-02-01 Thread Mathew Shember
of the pack... -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt We found that it didn't actually push the clients out as we wanted - it was quite

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-31 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
The concept certainly isnt new to us; we've been talking about that for years. I think the shock here is that someone is listening to anything the McAfee is saying. -- Espi On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Stu

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-31 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: The concept certainly isnt new to us; we've been talking about that for years.  I think the shock here is that someone is listening to anything the McAfee is saying. ROTFL! -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-31 Thread Jonathan Link
Well, no one is listenign to Symantec, so McAffee gets it by default. On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: The concept certainly isnt new to us; we've been talking about

The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-30 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
* The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt Wow, this is actually major security news. I found this on the blog from Coretrace, and they said: This week, McAfee, one of the two dominant forces in reactive, blacklist-based endpoint security, actively and unequivocally endorsed Application

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-30 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Stu Sjouwerman s...@sunbelt-software.com wrote: So, what is the big news? It turns security on its head. Instead of keeping bad code out, with application whitelisting (also known as Application Control) you only allow known-good code to run. That's really a

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-30 Thread Mathew Shember
Mcafee is sti in business? - Original Message - From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 02:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt * The Security

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-30 Thread Kurt Buff
Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt      * The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt Wow, this is actually major security news. I found this on the blog from Coretrace, and they said: This week, McAfee, one of the two dominant forces

Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt

2012-01-30 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 15:49, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Stu Sjouwerman s...@sunbelt-software.com wrote: So, what is the big news? It turns security on its head. Instead of keeping bad code out, with application whitelisting (also known as