2012 / server 2008 r2 KMS
This begs the question - MAC vs. KMS, when should a company go to KMS instead
of individual MAC keys? We have plenty of systems in our environment, my guess
it's really a matter of preference.
Is there any reason NOT to implement KMS activation in an environment large
Only if you have automated deployment tasks that depend on MAC.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: server 2012 / server 2008 r2 KMS
This begs the question - MAC vs. KMS, when should a company go to KMS
Adding KMS activation to my task list
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: server 2012 / server 2008 r2 KMS
Only if you have automated deployment tasks that depend on MAC.
From: David Lum
I don't have any experience with it, but that's how I read the KB article.
FWIW, this post seems to agree
http://www.winsysadminblog.com/2012/08/upgrading-your-current-kms-server-server-2008-r2-to-support-windows-8-and-server-2012-activation/
Jeff
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Michael B.
