RE: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-23 Thread ed ziots
, Sincerely, EZ Edward E. Ziots Security Engineer CISSP,Security +,Network+ From: pmaglin...@scvl.com To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: supereseded patches/hotfixes Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:45:25 + Sweet! Nice resource. Thanks for sharing! -Original

Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-22 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, ed ziots ezi...@hotmail.com wrote: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin NO worries, that one is a gold-mine for the M$ patches, I wish Oracle and Redhat and others had something similar. Is this what you're looking for?

RE: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-22 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Sweet! Nice resource. Thanks for sharing! -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, ed ziots ezi...@hotmail.com wrote

supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-16 Thread Jeff Bunting
Wondering if anyone knows of a queryable online resource that would let me know if a particular windows update or hotfix has been superseded by something newer? I know WSUS used to show this info, but we're not using it in this environment, and IIRC, it isn't searchable. I know KB articles will

RE: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-16 Thread ed ziots
, 16 Feb 2012 11:34:28 -0500 Subject: supereseded patches/hotfixes From: bunting.j...@gmail.com To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Wondering if anyone knows of a queryable online resource that would let me know if a particular windows update or hotfix has been superseded by something newer

Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-16 Thread Jeff Bunting
E. Ziots Senior Informational Security Engineer CISSP,Security +,Network+ -- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:34:28 -0500 Subject: supereseded patches/hotfixes From: bunting.j...@gmail.com To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Wondering if anyone knows

RE: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-16 Thread Randal, Phil
2012 18:18 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes Thanks, Ed. I didn't realize that info was included, and nicely highlighted. Very nice! However, I was primarily interested in KB2553549, which I suppose is a non-security hotfix. I thought there had been an update

Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-16 Thread Jeff Bunting
| Hereford HR2 6JT* Tel: 01432 260415 | Email: phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk *From:* Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 16 February 2012 18:18 *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes Thanks, Ed. I didn't realize that info was included

RE: supereseded patches/hotfixes

2012-02-16 Thread ed ziots
NO worries, that one is a gold-mine for the M$ patches, I wish Oracle and Redhat and others had something similar. Z Edward E. Ziots Senior Informational Security Engineer CISSP,Security +,Network+ Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:17:32 -0500 Subject: Re: supereseded patches/hotfixes From