The new DFS - DFS/R in Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2.
From: John Aldrich [jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Data replication in real-time (or near real-time)
We are currently using DFS to
psexec computername shutdown -r -f -t 0
:-)
From: James Rankin [kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Best way to schedule server reboots?
Script the shutdown command with the required parameters,
Feel free to contact me off list.
I do a lot of subcontract work for other consulting companies.
From: David Lum [david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Managed Services
And then there's us SMB
LOL!
I needed that
(I've been deep in the bowels of MAPI this morningugh.)
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Best way to schedule server reboots?
On Wed, Jul
, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Webstercarlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Best way to schedule server reboots?
Nice new title there
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com
wrote:
Michael B. Smith, Exchange
I believe that that is what Paul Thurott said in his newsletter yesterday.
Beyond having read that newsletter, I certainly can't confirm anything...
From: Brian Clark [brianclark2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin
well it certainly is a license violation!
From: Clayton Doige [clayton.do...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: enabling remote desktop on vista home prem
So I take it this is a no go then?
I had to get Sunbelt involved for me. A Lyris software upgrade in July had been
dropping ALL of my messages since July 7!
Dennis at Sunbelt made a couple of changes for me to get me back online with
the lists.
From: Joe Heaton [jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent:
not intentionally. ;-)
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 8:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Good NT sysadmin list?
If it weren't for OWA 2010's conversation view, I would've had to drop out
awhile ago
yes.
From: David W. McSpadden [dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Protocol SMTP interface Data1 (IP 10.0.10.15) on incoming connection (ICID
215625) from sender IP
i don't know what you mean by this statement: I see on the 2008 NICS they all
have 0.0.0.0 in them but apparently this is ok.
you should have a default gateway on the NLB network and NO default getway on
the heartbeat network.
your public and private networks must be different networks.
I see this behavior from time to time if a VM has been moved from one physical
server to another and ARP caching has been turned up to a large value on
switches.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:29 AM
To: NT
I recommend you do spam off-server (whether that be an Edge server for Exchange
or a third party provider, really isn't that relevant - just don't let it touch
your Exchange mailbox databases).
Exchange 2007 has Messaging Records Management (MRM) and Exchange 2010 has that
plus Retention
??
Do you expect to be able to run Exchange 2003 on Windows Server 2008 R2?
Same concept, just server level instead of user level.
From: Rene de Haas [rene.deh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IE8
Mydefrag.
From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
The only real benefit of a commercial product is they tend to be less
obtrusive to the users when they kick off - I
I used liberum in a former life (i.e., before I became an independent
consultant) and modified it heavily. I'm surprised to see that it doesn't
really appear to have been maintained at all. What's that about?
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Senior personnel should be able to lead by example, and they should be able to
handle client interactions without additional supervision (that is, they can be
nice to end-users even though they may be wrong).
Otherwise, it's about experience, IMHO.
YMMV. Void in the state of Wisconsin.
From:
Do NOT P2V a DC without permanently destroying (i.e., format) the physical DC.
You need to build a new DC, P or V doesn't matter, promote it, change the IP
address to the final IP address, shut it down, and put it in its permanent
location, and move it to the proper site in AD Sites and
I would never use a p2v to restore a DC unless there was only one DC in the
forest. Google/bing USN Rollback.
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: P2V on a DC
Build it from scratch. I would only
Depends on the kind of licensing deal you have with MSFT.
As I recollect, that's part of SA or EA or Select licensing. Not retail or open.
IANAL.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: P2V on a DC
If
The patch to correct this issue is already available and will probably be
pushed by MSFT soon.
There may be some issues with retail copies in the channel that need to be
replaced; but no major issues are expected.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
There were issues with IAS and RRAS between 2000 and 2003 that dealt with
default levels of security. I don't remember the details, although they should
be in the windows 2003 upgrade whitepapers at Microsoft.com.
From: Matt Falenski [mailto:matt.falen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28,
Where were you when we discussed this last month? :)
The conclusions come down to this, as I remember them:
1] in a domain environment, it's no problem. In a workgroup/homegroup
environment, SID duplication is a possibility.
2] some third party applications do depend on SID uniqueness.
From:
You need to run adprep forestprep and adprep domainprep. But it'll still be a
2003 domain until you update the other DCs and bump the FFL or DFL.
From: Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@all-mode.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server 2k8 in 2k3
Dell has recently moved quite a bit of their manufacturing to lower-cost parts
of the world.
This is what happens.
You can always ask your rep what is IN STOCK and available for shipment. That
doesn't necessarily get you the least expensive price though.
From: Matt Plahtinsky
The DC holding the PDC FSMO role.
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 9:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Time
I received a complaint from one of my users that the time on her computer is
four
Setsntp is GONE in Server 2008 R2.
C:\Users\Administratornet help time
The syntax of this command is:
NET TIME
[\\computername | /DOMAIN[:domainname] | /RTSDOMAIN[:domainname]] [/SET]
NET TIME synchronizes the computer's clock with that of another computer
or domain, or displays the time for a
You have to run the schema upgrade, but nothing says that you ever have to bump
the domain functional level or the forest functional level.
I've done this for a number of customers, with no ill effect.
I'd recommend you roll out 2008 or 2008 R2. It'll save you work in the future.
From: David
You can disable that requirement. See
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731654(WS.10).aspx
and/or
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942564
Although, I wouldn't expect that to come into play until after you bump the DFL
or FFL...
From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
to 2008 doesn't really do
anything I particular anyway, right?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding 2008 DC's...
You have to run the schema upgrade, but nothing says that you ever have
: bounce-8784996-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8784996-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Michael
B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding 2008 DC's...
It removes a number of obsolete security options.
I quote
seen the 2008 DCs removed some crypto options from netlogon, but there's
a GPO setting to add the support back.
-Mike
From: bounce-8784996-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8784996-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Michael
B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12
SharePoint/WSS.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Is E-mail the right solution for this request?
Saw this Help Desk ticket flow to my team today:
Need a mailbox set up for expense reports: This mailbox will be
What cert is that?
Anyway, I work for myself now; but except for certs that I had to use a work
lab for (I'm thinking Cisco Unity and CCNP back in the days before router sims
were cheap), I never used any work time.
-Original Message-
From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com]
Sent:
I would suggest you take ownership over all files, first; and second ensure
that you are starting a Windows Explorer with elevated permissions.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 1:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Creator/owner changes in server 2008.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12.5 file restore missing a bunch of files
OK. This is getting stranger... :-)
I
This is a path to problems.
I recommend that after you demote a DC, and BEFORE CLICKING THE REBOOT BUTTON,
go and remove DNS Server. Reboot. Go clean up DNS on another DC in the same or
a covering site ASAP.
After you have run all of your demotions, use dcdiag and dnslint and netdiag to
is there a particular reason you want to use II? And I'm not completely clear
about your quoting requirements, but I'd do something like this:
$arrayPaths = Dir/1, Dir/2, Dir/3 -- don't need the initializer since you
have the comma operator
$options = '--verbose --recursive --blah
This would be why I said I wasn't clear on your quoting requirements. :-)
I know the whole Cygwin thing combined with PowerShell combined with cmd.exe
can be a littlestrange.
This seems to work, on my system.
$arrayPaths = administrator/, administrator.WXP000/, All Users/
$Options =
It says specifically in that KB that the issue referred to by that KB doesn't
occur in Win7! :-P
Note: This issue does not occur in Windows 7. The registry key
DhcpConnEnableBcastFlagToggle is set to 1 by default.
-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming
That's not a regular expression! That's just System.String.Replace().
So
$strLog = ($path.Replace(/$, )).Replace(/, _) + '.log'
If you actually meant /$ as a regex, so that it removes the last character of
$path, if it's a /, you can keep that and do:
$strLog = ([regex]::Replace($path,
When did THAT happen? Hmph. No-one told me.
From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange list?
David,
I think the list your thinking about which shut down around that time has moved
to a forum style
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange list?
Is the Exchange list very active? Heck I haven't even seen my confirmation yet.
Eh, been but 5 hours, maybe tomorrow it'll show.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 1
It appears that Lyris is commonly dropping the replies of those of us using
Outlook 2010, unless we switch them to plain text (as I just did for this one).
That has quite a bit to do with it. I posted 31 messages in replies this past
week, based on a review of the Lyris website, 4 of them were
You should NOT have time skews...
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: just who's in charge here (dom controller query)
Make the other one a GC too.
You should have time skews like that. That's
You can always avoid output, as far as I know.
Anything output by a function is put onto the pipe. That's by design.
Give me a specific example where you think you can't avoid output?
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January
So...Win 7 has nltest built-in, right?
You may want to try a nltest /sc_change_pwd:domain every week or so while
you are VPN'ed in.
I'm guessing the computer account password is expiring. I not sure if
sc_change_pwd causes that to re-handshake or not, but it's my best guess.
BDesmond or BFree
-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Win 7 trust relationship failure via VPN
So...Win 7 has nltest built-in, right?
You may want to try a nltest /sc_change_pwd:domain every week or
so while
I've never heard of such a thing.
I'd want to see the error.
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Too many replies causes Outlook to not send???
I've noticed that on messages where there has been an
Is this Windows software raid?
Then you’ll have to update boot.ini to point to the second drive.
Alternately switch the cables (or switch the drives).
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
As long as they don't require special drivers.
I moved PART of an org to 64bit with little trouble. When we tried to expand
into their manufacturing and instrumentation areas, we gave up. Some of those
computers were (and are) running NT 4 because drivers had never been updated...
Hi Bill.
I graduated from ECU in 1983 and did some of my grad work at Pitt Memorial. I
have fond memories of Pitt County.
Enough of old home week - push back. Really really hard.
That's ridiculous. Services are even easy to do in the Win32 API.
It takes less than 20 lines of code in C# to
Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 1:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange list?
It's quite active, but I submitted a complaint about my reply messages not
showing up so they may have taken it temporarily offline
Could one of you who has a non-domain-joined Server 2008 or Server 2008 R2 (or
Vista or Win7) image running in _VMware_ open a command prompt and run
W32tm /query /source
Please note that if you've previously done a net time /setsntp:... these
results won't help me. I'm looking to find
These are simple 2008 security enhancements.
Why are you creating files at the root of a partition anyway? It's a bad idea!
Otherwise, you need to open your cmd prompt or windows explore elevated - that
is, click on the icon for them and select Run as Administrator.
From: Neil Standley
And how does the wife feel about that?
[sorry, couldn't resist.]
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Managed Switches...
I love my Procurves.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Reimer, Mark
I don't understand why you wouldn't use the Microsoft Swing method, my
abbreviated Swing method, or SBS MVP Jeff Middleton's Swing method. Jeff's kit
is only USD $200, and it'll cost more time than that just to fix all the
desktop profiles.
A very worthwhile investment.
[Note: my method is
from a 2003 non-SBS domain to 2008 SBS domain. Company is downsizing.
I haven't found a good migration document for that yet. Still looking.
Matt
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I don't understand why you wouldn't use
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: [OT] (early) Friday funny... iPad
Der Fuhrer is disappointed over Apples latest...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQnT0zp8Ya4
--
--
Gregory
The use of back lighting make it NO WHERE more functional than a Kindle.
-Original Message-
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [OT] (early) Friday funny... iPad
No multitasking = Fail. Personally,
Thanks to everyone who helped with this! I used these results in a blog entry I
just posted.
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2010/01/29/a-brief-history-of-time-ok-ok-let-s-go-with-quot-an-introduction-to-the-windows-time-service-quot.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
seriously thinking
about moving to VPS hosting anyway.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Exchange MVP Owner: The Essential Exchange
http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
From: Brian Richards [mailto:locomotive_breath_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Is D: formatted NTFS?
From: James Hill [mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 4:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 - Page file
Haven't seen that one. I know this isn't any help but I have changed the page
file to a different drive on and
How large is the volume? Is it Basic, Dynamic, or GPT?
Is this Windows x86 or x64?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauth...@lastar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I've got several clients that use it, and I personally use it. Insofar as a
corporate solution, I'd recommend you look at LiveMeeting, OCS, and/or
friends. But for a one-on-one solution, I think Skype works just fine.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
Each time I sit down in front of a windows xp box now I hate it. Windows 7 is
MUCH easier and quicker to use.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:27
From the non-domain computer, map a drive to the BE computer.
CD down the tree to the RANT directory and run setup.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:07 PM
To: NT
I've always run setup. YMMV.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 5:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BEX 12.5 adding agent to non domain pc
Setup
Import it into their local certificate store, including the trusted root.
Same as with any certificate.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:04 PM
To: NT
Many carriers differentiate between business and personal use. And they
consider hosting to be business use.
GoDaddy is something ridiculously cheap like $4.50 a month. (I prepay annually
and my cost is less than $4 a month.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
Cpanel installs with a self-signed cert to get the isp up for testing. They are
supposed to replace it with a real one.
Sounds like ETC Advanced Technology isn't very advanced.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message
Adprep adds the schema changes.
None of the new features are activated until the DFL or FFL is increased.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Palmer, Neal [mailto:npal...@uwic.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 7:53 AM
To: NT System
Yes. If you are using 2003 R2 media on a 2003 no-R2 domain.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ODD W2K3 DC DCPROMO
Nit picker. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding 2008 DC's... (revisited
Nltest /sc_reset:domain\desired-dc
Note that a domain member, once connected to a particular DC, will continue to
talk to that DC unless the site is changed or the secure channel reset or the
DC isn't available.
Netdom can do this too.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
No. if you separate the sites you should be fine.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 7:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I've wondered - what is the overhead involved with that?
You didn't really cover that in AD 4e.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010
Microsoft online has a SharePoint offering, about USD 15 per user per month.
There are lots of in-house answers to this question but they involve detailed
licensing scenarios.
WSS, for example, MIGHT be free. But it depends.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
Sure - strong assembly signing.
It serves to validate that the executables you are loading are actually from
who they say they are from.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Christopher [mailto:c.bo
with nary a problem.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Jeremy Anderson [mailto:jer...@mapiadmin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT ? Server ROI - Reuse ?
I am not even sure what the subject
Whoa. They've done some serious updating to those articles in the last couple
of months. I've not seen those mentioned in any of the other lists I read -
where did you get those Bob? From your PFE or TAM? Or someplace more public?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
Great stuff. Thanks.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding 2008 DC's... (revisited)
The PFE
solutions (although I
understand getting an exemption is pretty easy).
I've taken and passed tests and labs in it. No real-world experience though.
But I'm ready when necessary. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From
Yes. But then they introduced CIDR (look it up!) :-) and that saved the
Internet for about a decade.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010
CIDR, again.
IPv5 was a lab protocol; never deployed in the wild.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin
I could have the year wrong. I take so many certification tests I can't keep
anything straight any more. I just read the book, take the test, and go on...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff
http://compnetworking.about.com/b/2008/11/05/what-happened-to-ipv5.htm
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:24 PM
To: NT System
No.
Gmail's behavior is not RFC compliant.
They started out using the '+'s for throw-away addresses, but apparently
websites caught onto that pretty quick so they expanded into full-stops.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl
Actually not quite the same! :-) Exchange requires you to specifically define
the email addresses it will accept.
With gmail, an infinite number of addresses can match a mailbox.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sherry Abercrombie
Google is an internet darling and has been pretty much since day one.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT
OK, I got accused (rightfully so) of this issue. All of the rest of you running
Outlook 2010 beta should apply this too!
http://blogs.technet.com/office2010/archive/2010/02/11/fix-for-message-size-issue-in-outlook-2010-beta.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
OK, I got accused (rightfully so) of this issue. All of the rest of you running
Outlook 2010 beta should apply this too!
http://blogs.technet.com/office2010/archive/2010/02/11/fix-for-message-size-issue-in-outlook-2010-beta.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
Yes there are differences.
There is an adprep32.exe on the installation media to work around this issue.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 9:24 PM
To: NT System
You may not have an exactly matching configuration. That is, the exact same SKU
and SP and patches on the VM as you did on the physical box.
2000/2003 are very finicky about system state restores.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
That's the same version I have (Win7 ultimate x64).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What is the latest version
They are in Exchange.
They are not required to be, per RFC.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Recipient
, not file based.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Removable SATA backups
Has anyone looked into removable SATA drives
that Microsoft DPM has, and I know recent
versions of BackupExec/NetBackup support it too.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Not is through the backup media, but is through the backup application.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Actually, the bare metal recovery (part of the 2008 kernel) is pretty easy. Not
significantly different than bare metal recovery in 2008 R2.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Mike Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net]
Sent: Tuesday
1 - 100 of 3233 matches
Mail list logo
