Steven G. Johnson wrote:
Andrew Jaffe wrote:
numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are
actually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of
the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real numbers with the frequencies
as in rfftfreq (i.e., two real
Andrew Jaffe wrote:
numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are
actually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of
the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real numbers with the frequencies
as in rfftfreq (i.e., two real numbers at the same frequency,
On 9/7/06, Andrew Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,It seems that scipy and numpy define rfft differently.numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers areactually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of
the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real
Hi Charles,
Charles R Harris wrote:
On 9/7/06, *Andrew Jaffe* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that scipy and numpy define rfft differently.
numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are
actually real) with
On 9/7/06, Andrew Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Charles,Charles R Harris wrote: On 9/7/06, *Andrew Jaffe* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi all, It seems that scipy and numpy define rfft differently. numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are
