On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:01:10PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Hanni Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to see a 64bit build for windows as well if possible.
Unfortunately, this is difficult: windows 64 is not commonly available
(I don't have
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
I was just wondering, could we ask Microsoft for some help here. A build
bot, or a Windows 64 license... They are helping porting the SAGE project
to windows, so they do have interest in getting open source scientific
software working on windows.
Windows 64 is
I have used the trail of Visual Studio 2008 (on full Server 2003) it
copmiles and runs well if you comment out the lines meantioned earlier on in
this thread.
I am planning to spend some time with the intel fortran compiler to try to
compile blas/lapack in the next few weeks. It is part of my
Hi Robert,
Attached is the complete output, below is what I believe is the relevant
area of interest:
compiling C sources
creating build\temp.win-amd64-2.6\Release\build
creating build\temp.win-amd64-2.6\Release\build\src.win-amd64-2.6
creating
2008/6/8 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Right now there's if __name__ == '__main__' boilerplate at the end
of every test module; nose can find and run tests without that being
there. I wanted to get the list's take on removing that--it just
means that if you want to run the tests in one
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest we also remove ParametricTestCase now.
I don't mind converting the existing uses (looks like it's only used 5
times) to something else, it was causing trouble for me with nose
anyway--whenever the test module
Alan McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest we also remove ParametricTestCase now.
I don't mind converting the existing uses (looks like it's only used 5
times) to something else, it was causing trouble for me with nose
Hi,
I am sure you know this already, but you can just replace the tests
using ParametricTestCase with a nose test generator. See:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/wiki/TestingGuidelines
under Parametric tests.
Best,
Matthew
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using it in some of my code, but I'll happily switch to nose. It
will make my life easier, however, if I can see how you've converted it.
If you do this, can you indicate what svn revision made the switch?
Certainly,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Matthew Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure you know this already, but you can just replace the tests
using ParametricTestCase with a nose test generator.
Thanks for pointing that out; it's a rather cool feature. :)
With the most recent change in numpy 1.1 it seems that numpy.histogram
was broken when wanting a normalized histogram. I thought the idea
was to leave the functionality of histogram as it was in 1.1 and then
break
the api in 1.2?
import numpy
a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]
numpy.histogram(a)
ma, 2008-06-09 kello 11:11 -0400, Tommy Grav kirjoitti:
With the most recent change in numpy 1.1 it seems that numpy.histogram
was broken when wanting a normalized histogram. I thought the idea was
to leave the functionality of histogram as it was in 1.1 and then
break the api in 1.2?
[clip]
I understand this and agree, but it still means that the API for
histogram is
broken since normed can only be used with the new=True parameter. I
though
the whole point of the future warning was to avoid this. It is not a
big deal,
just means that one is forced to use the new API somewhat
Dear Friends,
Our wonderful buildbot is in declining health. The Mac can't update from
svn, Andrew's machines are offline, the Sparcs have lost their spark, and
bsd_64 is suffering from tolist() syndrome:
==
FAIL: Ticket #793,
Charles R Harris wrote:
Dear Friends,
Our wonderful buildbot is in declining health. The Mac can't update
from svn, Andrew's machines are offline, the Sparcs have lost their
spark, and bsd_64 is suffering from tolist() syndrome:
AFAIK, I don't have any machines on the buildbot... Is there
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only Windows_xp_64 still functions, but for how long? We need your help!
What version of the MS compilers is needed for a Windows build? I've
got a WinXP machine that could be used as a buildbot as long as I
don't have
Hi,
I'm getting an assembler error Error: suffix or operands invalid for
`fnstsw' while trying to build numpy on cygwin (running under windows
XP running on vmware on a mac pro). I've tried the last two releases
of numpy and the svn version. Has anybody ever seen this before?
-Chris
tail
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
Dear Friends,
Our wonderful buildbot is in declining health. The Mac can't update
from svn, Andrew's machines are offline, the Sparcs have lost their
spark, and bsd_64 is suffering from
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bruce Southey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only Windows_xp_64 still functions, but for how long? We need your help!
What version of the MS compilers is needed
2008/6/9 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
Dear Friends,
Our wonderful buildbot is in declining health. The Mac can't update
from svn, Andrew's machines are offline, the Sparcs have lost
2008/6/9 Tommy Grav [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I understand this and agree, but it still means that the API for
histogram is
broken since normed can only be used with the new=True parameter. I
though
the whole point of the future warning was to avoid this. It is not a
big deal,
just means that one
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/6/9 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
Dear Friends,
Our wonderful buildbot is in declining health.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to package numpy 1.1 and upload it to Debian, all worked fine,
I installed the package and:
In [1]: import numpy
---
ImportError
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 18:07, Anne Archibald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then again, it doesn't usually work for me to use the boilerplate to
run a single test without installing, since the non-installed test
doesn't necessarily find all the non-installed code, sometimes falling
back on the
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 18:34, Keith Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a function that converts ranks into a Gaussian?
I have an array x:
import numpy as np
x = np.random.rand(5)
I rank it:
x = x.argsort().argsort()
x_ranked = x.argsort().argsort()
x_ranked
array([3,
On Monday 09 June 2008 22:06:24 Keith Goodman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are subtleties in computing ranks when ties are involved. Take a
look at the implementation of scipy.stats.rankdata().
Good point. I had to deal with ties and
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Pierre GM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 22:06:24 Keith Goodman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are subtleties in computing ranks when ties are involved. Take a
look at the implementation of
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 21:06, Keith Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 18:34, Keith Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a function that converts ranks into a Gaussian?
I have an array x:
On Monday 09 June 2008 22:30:09 Keith Goodman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Pierre GM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a scipy.stats.mstats.rankdata() that take care of both ties and
missing data. Missing data are allocated a rank of either 0 or the
average rank, depending on some
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 21:06, Keith Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 18:34, Keith Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a
30 matches
Mail list logo
