On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@enthought.com wrote:
In numpy 1.6.1, what's the most straightforward way to convert a datetime64
to a python datetime.datetime? E.g. I have
In [1]: d = datetime64(2011-12-03 12:34:56.75)
In [2]: d
Out[2]: 2011-12-03
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Didrik Pinte dpi...@enthought.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@enthought.com wrote:
In numpy 1.6.1, what's the most straightforward way to convert a
datetime64
to a python datetime.datetime? E.g. I have
In
On 12/4/2011 1:43 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I don't think there are 5 active developers, let alone 11.
With hard work you might scrape together two or three.
Having 5 or 11 people making decisions for the two or
three actually doing the work isn't going to go over well.
Very true! But you
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/4/2011 1:43 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I don't think there are 5 active developers, let alone 11.
With hard work you might scrape together two or three.
Having 5 or 11 people making decisions for the two or
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to add a fixed precision rational number dtype to numpy,
and am running into an issue trying to register ufunc loops. The code
in question looks like
int npy_rational =
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
When attempting to cast to a user defined type, PyArray_GetCast looks
up the cast function in the dictionary but doesn't check if the entry
exists. This causes segfaults. Here's a patch.
Geoffrey
diff --git
Hi ,
I am trying to learn python to convert some of my mlab codes to python.Am
new to python.Some help here would be appreciated
I am trying to make a column vector by stacking two scalars--Xstart,Xend
and second column of n X 2 2Darray--A
In matlab the code is b=[Xstart;A(:,1);Xend]
I have
You can do it in one shot with:
x = np.vstack((Xstart, A[:, 0:1], Xend))
Using A[:, 0:1] instead of A[:, 0] lets you keep it as a 2d matrix (this
should answer your last question).
Then the scalars Xstart and Xend will automatically be broadcasted to
accomodate the shape of A[:, 0:1], so you
This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm guessing
this code doesn't get a lot of testing. Glad it's there, though!
Geoffrey
diff --git a/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c
b/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c
index 0d6cf19..a93eda1 100644
---
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm guessing
this code doesn't get a lot of testing. Glad it's there, though!
Geoffrey
diff --git a/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
When attempting to cast to a user defined type, PyArray_GetCast looks
up the cast function in the dictionary but doesn't check if the entry
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
When attempting to cast to a user defined type,
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm guessing
this code doesn't get a lot of testing. Glad it's there, though!
Thanks Oliver.
You can do it in one shot with:
x = np.vstack((Xstart, A[:, 0:1], Xend))
Using A[:, 0:1] instead of A[:, 0] lets you keep it as a 2d matrix (this
should answer your last question).
Then the scalars Xstart and Xend will automatically be broadcasted to
accomodate the shape of
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm
Great points. My initial suggestion of 5-11 was more about current board size
rather than trying to fix it.
I agree that having someone represent from major downstream projects would be a
great thing.
-Travis
On Dec 4, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On 12/4/2011 1:43 AM,
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving
17 matches
Mail list logo
