Le mercredi 16 mai 2012 à 22:58 +0200, Ralf Gommers a écrit :
Both coverage=True and coverage=False work with your attached package.
But it seems you attached an old version, because test_a.py doesn't
include the actual test. obj = a.b.mycls() in test_a.py executes
fine, so it may be a
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Fabrice Silva si...@lma.cnrs-mrs.frwrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2012 à 22:58 +0200, Ralf Gommers a écrit :
Both coverage=True and coverage=False work with your attached package.
But it seems you attached an old version, because test_a.py doesn't
include the
Nautilus and file-roller are *** on me...
I hope this one is good.
Thanks for being patient :)
Best regards
--
Fabrice Silva
mypackage.tar
Description: Unix tar archive
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Fabrice Silva si...@lma.cnrs-mrs.frwrote:
Nautilus and file-roller are *** on me...
I hope this one is good.
Thanks for being patient :)
That was the right tar file. The issue was the one Josef was pointing too
(cover-inclusive), which has already been fixed
Le jeudi 17 mai 2012 à 11:16 +0200, Ralf Gommers a écrit :
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Fabrice Silva si...@lma.cnrs-mrs.frwrote:
Nautilus and file-roller are *** on me...
I hope this one is good.
Thanks for being patient :)
That was the right tar file. The issue was the one
Anthony,
Thanks for looking into this. A few other notes about fromstring() (
and fromfile() ).
Frankly they haven't gotten much love -- they are, as you have seen,
less than optimized, and kind of buggy (actually, not really buggy,
but not robust in the face of malformed input -- and they give
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Thouis Jones thouis.jo...@curie.fr wrote:
I wondered, however, if there were a better way to accomplish the same
goal, preferably in pure python.
Fabien recently posted this; not sure if it addresses your use case:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Thouis Jones thouis.jo...@curie.fr wrote:
I wondered, however, if there were a better way to accomplish the same
goal, preferably in pure python.
Fabien recently posted this; not
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I'd be tempted to just see if I could get by with massif or another
real heap profiler -- unfortunately the ones I know are C oriented,
but might still be useful...
I got some very useful information from Fabien's
I'm repeating myself a bit, but my previous thread of this ended up
being about something else, and also since then I've been on an
expedition to the hostile waters of python-dev.
I'm crazy enough to believe that I'm proposing a technical solution to
alleviate the problems we've faced as a
10 matches
Mail list logo
