On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
tried in scipy. I thought I'd open the topic for
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
because it caused all sorts of problems on
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really have any deep issue with `skip_header=True`, besides not
really liking having an argument whose type can vary. But that's only a
matter of personal taste. And yes, we could always check the type…
I guess I
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 17:47 , Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I guess I still have a small preference for skip_header=comments
over skip_header=True, since the latter is more opaque for no purpose.
Also it makes me slightly antsy since skip_header is normally an
integer, and True is, in fact,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Working lazy imports would be
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
Note that my being opposed is because the benefits are smaller than the
cost. If there was a better reason than shaving a couple of extra
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
--- systems that try to freeze Python programs were
particularly annoyed at SciPy's lazy import mechanism.
That's ironic to me -- while the solution to a lot of freezing
problems is to include everything including the
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Current issues can be seen from the last test log on our Windows XP
buildbot
(June 29,
Hey John,
Will you be able to clean up the indentation issues for your inplace increment
patch today. I would like to include it in NumPy 1.7.
Thanks,
-Travis
On Jul 6, 2012, at 10:37 AM, John Salvatier wrote:
Okay, done (
I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
* 326 -- inplace increment function
* 325 -- prefer gfortran on OSX and Linux
* 192 -- meshgrid enhancements
* 327 -- restore commas and update C-API doc a bit
* 352 -- simplifying case for insert and adding tests (#2028)
* 350
I (or somebody else) needs to fix 325, Ralf pointed out that I was slightly
too aggressive preferring gfortran on vendor operating systems. I think I
should be able to fix this in the next couple of hours, I've been
delinquent in getting back to it.
A
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Travis
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
* 326 -- inplace increment function
-1, for the reasons stated in the comment thread -- we shouldn't lock
ourselves into an ugly API when there's
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, John Salvatier
jsalv...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile numpy on Windows 7 using the command: python setup.py
config --compiler=mingw32 build but I get an error about a symbol table not
found. Anyone know how to work around this or what to
On Jul 17, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
* 326 -- inplace increment function
-1, for the reasons stated in the comment thread -- we
14 matches
Mail list logo
