On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 08:58 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 01/05/2013 10:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 5 Jan 2013 12:16, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following on from Nathaniel's explorations of the scalar - array
casting rules, some resources on rank-0
On 6 Jan 2013 07:59, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
Try to enumerate all the fundamentally different things (if you count
memory use/running time) that can happen for ndarrays a, b, and
arbitrary x here:
a += b[x]
That's already quite a lot, your proposal adds even
On 01/06/2013 10:41 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 08:58 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 01/05/2013 10:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 5 Jan 2013 12:16, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following on from Nathaniel's explorations of the scalar - array
On 01/06/2013 11:16 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 6 Jan 2013 07:59, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Try to enumerate all the fundamentally different things (if you count
memory use/running time) that can happen for ndarrays a, b, and
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
To be clear, what you're talking about is basically deleting these two packages:
numpy.oldnumeric
numpy.numarray
plus the compatibility C API in
numpy/numarray/include
?
So this would only affect
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
To be clear, what you're talking about is basically deleting these two
packages:
numpy.oldnumeric
numpy.numarray
plus the
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I should have been more precise: I like the proposal, but also believe
the additional complexity introduced have significant costs that must be
considered.
a) Making += behave differently for readonly
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On 5 Jan 2013 12:16, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following on from Nathaniel's explorations of the scalar - array
casting rules, some resources on rank-0 arrays.
The discussion that Nathaniel
Question for everyone, is this really reasonable:
import numpy as np
from operator import index
index(np.array([[5]]))
5
int(np.array([[5]]))
5
[0,1,2,3][np.array([[2]])]
2
To me, this does not make sense, why should we allow to use a high
dimensional object like a normal scalar (its ok for
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On 5 Jan 2013 12:16, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following on from Nathaniel's explorations of the scalar -
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Question for everyone, is this really reasonable:
import numpy as np
from operator import index
index(np.array([[5]]))
5
int(np.array([[5]]))
5
[0,1,2,3][np.array([[2]])]
2
Not sure I understand the point
On 01/06/2013 05:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I should have been more precise: I like the proposal, but also believe
the additional complexity introduced have significant costs that must be
considered.
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 13:28 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Question for everyone, is this really reasonable:
import numpy as np
from operator import index
index(np.array([[5]]))
5
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
To be clear, what you're talking about is
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
Which exact Python do we need to use on Mac? Do we need to use the
binary installer from python.org?
Yes, the one from python.org.
Or can I install it from source?
you could install from source using the same method
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel
2013/1/5 Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Andrew Collette
andrew.colle...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the current behavior is confusing. Regardless of the details
of what to do, I suppose my main objection is that, to me, it's really
unexpected that adding a
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
2013/1/5 Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Andrew Collette
andrew.colle...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the current behavior is confusing. Regardless of the details
of what to do, I suppose my
2013/1/6 Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
2013/1/5 Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Andrew Collette
andrew.colle...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the current behavior is confusing. Regardless of
I realize we may be a minority but it
would be very nice if support for numeric could be kept for a few
more versions. We don't have any particular needs for numarray.
We just under went through an extremely long and painful process
to upgrade our software
21 matches
Mail list logo
