Hi,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre
On 2/6/2013 10:35 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Christoph,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
[...]
In order not to leave this discussion without a resolution:
Christophe - would you allow us to distribute your numpy binaries for
1.7 from the numpy
Hi,
As expected all Theano's tests passed.
thanks
Fred
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of
NumPy 1.7.0rc2.
Sources and binary installers can be found at
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
any ETA for those?
No, I'll have to ask again.
I think I'm right in thinking you'll need a Fortran compiler for Scipy
but not Numpy?
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
any ETA for those?
No, I'll have to ask again.
I think
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
any ETA for those?
No, I'll have to ask again.
I think
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think you will need a developer's license for MKL
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
I must say I'm a little confused as to how we're going to make the
decisions here.
How about: attempt to
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
I must say I'm a little
Hi,
I have recently setup a page about modern Fortran:
http://fortran90.org/
and in particular, it has a long section with side by side syntax
examples of Python/NumPy vs Fortran:
http://fortran90.org/src/rosetta.html
I would be very interested if some NumPy gurus would provide me
feedback. I
Hi,
I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and
fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was
still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran and some other
stuff was harder to do. The fastest was fortran, then C++, but pypy around
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
I must say I'm a
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we defer the Scipy build until after
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to
release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it isn't, we
haven't discussed that. It may not come up.
Is anyone suggesting we hold the whole
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to
release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to
release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it
On 2/6/2013 7:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of
NumPy 1.7.0rc2.
Sources and binary installers can be found at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0rc2/
We have fixed all issues known to us since
Frédéric,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and
fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was
still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran
Hi Wes,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
We've released pandas 0.10.1 which includes many bug fixes from
0.10.0 (including a number of issues with the new file parser,
e.g. reading multiple files in separate threads), various
performance
Thanks for providing this. Reference is excellent, especially as I was
collecting Fortran and f2py resources, some month ago, and I found nothing
similar to answers you expose.
Side by side syntax is just great and intuitive
And rest is...
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ondřej Čertík
21 matches
Mail list logo
