Hi,
I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with Python
3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test program:
import numpy as np
print(np.__version__)
K = np.array([[ 0., 0., 0., 0.],
[-0., 0., 0.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Andrew Straw dr.andrew.st...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with
Python 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test program:
import numpy as np
print(np.__version__)
K = np.array([[ 0., 0.
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce the
availability of SciPy 0.13.0. This release contains some interesting new
features (see highlights below) and half a year's worth of maintenance
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Andrew Straw dr.andrew.st...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with Python
3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test program:
import numpy as np
print(np.__version__)
K = np.array([[ 0., 0.
It's py3 only, see the discussion in #3977.
On 25 Oct 2013 17:45, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Andrew Straw
dr.andrew.st...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with
Python 3.3.2 on
Yeah, sorry for the confusion. I thought my email didn't go through. I
created a bug report on github instead. Now I find the email was indeed
sent. Sorry about that. Looking at the github activity (see
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/3977 ), I think a fix is almost at
hand thanks to Julian
I recently came up with a way of vectorizing some recursive sequence
calculations. While it works, I am afraid it is relying on implementation
details potentially subject to change. The basic idea is illustrated by
this function, calculating the first n items of the Fibonacci sequence:
def
Jaime Fernández del Río jaime.f...@gmail.com a écrit :
I recently came up with a way of vectorizing some recursive sequence
calculations. While it works, I am afraid it is relying on
implementation
details potentially subject to change. The basic idea is illustrated by
this function, calculating
Ned,
I think this fell off the list (I really don't like when reply is not set
to the list...)
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
On Oct 25, 2013, at 15:17 , Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
Oops!
Wrong list--darn auto complete!
Sorry about that,
Chris
On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Ned,
I think this fell off the list (I really don't like when reply is not set
to the list...)
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
10 matches
Mail list logo