Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Andrew Collette
Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and 2.6 and 2.7 will be even worse :-) Ha! Didn't even think of that. For our

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Non-meta indexing improvements discussion

2015-04-09 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Do, 2015-04-09 at 08:50 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: Hi all, Let me take a shot at summing up some suggestions to make the indexing less surprising, and maybe we can gather some more in a more concentrated way now. Did not want to comment on the first mail 1. Implement something like

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Nathaniel Smith
(Off-list) Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and 2.6 and 2.7 will be even worse :-) On Apr 9, 2015 2:07 PM, Andrew

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread josef.pktd
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote: Alan wrote: 3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours? The only confusing case is mixing slices and integer array indexing for ndim 2.

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Andrew Collette
Announcing HDF5 for Python (h5py) 2.5.0 The h5py team is happy to announce the availability of h5py 2.5.0. This release introduces experimental support for the highly-anticipated Single Writer Multiple Reader (SWMR) feature in the upcoming HDF5 1.10

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Non-meta indexing improvements discussion

2015-04-09 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote: On Do, 2015-04-09 at 08:50 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: 3. I do not know if it possible or useful, but I could imagine a module wide switch (similar to __future__ imports) to change the default indexing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Do, 2015-04-09 at 02:22 -0400, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote: 1. I use numpy in teaching. I have never heard a complaint about its indexing behavior. Have you heard such complaints? Some observations: 1) There's an

[Numpy-discussion] SIAM meeting in Snowbird anyone?

2015-04-09 Thread Sebastian Berg
Hey, since I am not in the US often and the SIAM conference is pretty large, I was wondering if some more of our community will be at the SIAM conference in Snowbird around May 17th-21st and would like to meet up then. - Sebastian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

[Numpy-discussion] Non-meta indexing improvements discussion

2015-04-09 Thread Sebastian Berg
Hi all, Let me take a shot at summing up some suggestions to make the indexing less surprising, and maybe we can gather some more in a more concentrated way now. 1. Implement something like `arr.fancy_index[...]` and `arr.ortho_index[...]` (i.e. Jaimes PR is the start for trying this) 2. Add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Derek Homeier
On 9 Apr 2015, at 9:41 pm, Andrew Collette andrew.colle...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Alan G Isaac
Alan wrote: 3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours? On 4/9/2015 2:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Well, okay, this would explain it, since integer fancy indexing is exactly the confusing case:-) On the plus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread josef.pktd
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: (Off-list) Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me do a serious double take before I figured out what was going

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Alan G Isaac
On 4/9/2015 1:57 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Do you think there's anything we could be doing to reduce this kind of adrenaline reaction while still allowing for relaxed discussion about out-there ideas? numpy3...@scipy.org :-) ___ NumPy-Discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Apr 9, 2015 2:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: (Off-list) Doh, we do reply-to munging, don't we. Oh well. -n ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote: 1. I use numpy in teaching. I have never heard a complaint about its indexing behavior. Have you heard such complaints? Some observations: 1) There's an unrelated thread on numpy-discussion right now in which a user is

[Numpy-discussion] what files to include with compiled fortran extension on Mac

2015-04-09 Thread Mark Bakker
Hello list, I want to send somebody my compiled fortran extension on a Mac (compiled with f2py and gfortran). Problem is that it doesn't work on other Macs unless they also instal xcode (2 GB, yikes!) and gfortran. So apparently there are some additional files missing when I just send the