Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-21 Thread George Nurser
2008/5/21 Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Christopher Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've built a Mac binary for the 1.1 release candidate. Mac users, please test it from: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.1.0rc1-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg This is for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher Barker
Jarrod Millman wrote: please test it from: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.1.0rc1-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg Please test the Mac binaries. I can't tag the release until I know that our binary installers work on a wide variety of Mac machines. Has there been a new build since the endian

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher Burns
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Christopher Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has there been a new build since the endian bug in the tests was fixed? -Chris Nope. I figured that would be included in the 1.1.1 release. -- Christopher Burns Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher Barker
Christopher Burns wrote: Nope. I figured that would be included in the 1.1.1 release. It seems a few bugs have been found and fixed. It would be nice to put out another release candidate with those fixes at some point. Anyway: OS-X 10.4.11 Dual g5 PPC: FAILED (failures=3, errors=12)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher Burns
You're right, I'll put out a new rc. Sorry, I didn't see the other emails this morning and assumed the only errors were the endian issues in the test code. Apparently these are still an issue though, so I'll look into that. Chris On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Christopher Barker [EMAIL

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-21 Thread Thomas Hrabe
iBook G4 osX 10.5.2 hope this helps! Numpy is installed in /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy Numpy version 1.1.0rc1 Python version 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 22 2008, 07:57:53) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363)] Found 18/18 tests for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And now fixed on the trunk. I believe that's the correct place to fix bugs for 1.1.0 at this time. Yes, the trunk is where fixes should go. Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Robert Pyle
Hi all, On May 19, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Christopher Burns wrote: I've built a Mac binary for the 1.1 release candidate. Mac users, please test it from: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.1.0rc1-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg This is for the MacPython installed from python.org. From System

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Christopher Burns
Reminder to please test the installer. We already discovered a couple endian bugs on PPC, which is good, but we'd like to verify the release candidate on several more machines before the 1.1.0 tag on Thursday. It only takes a few minutes and you get the added bonus of having a current install of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Tommy Grav
Powerbook G4 with 10.5.2 and Activestate Python 2.5.1.1, no problems beyond the two endian test failures Cheers Tommy On May 20, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Christopher Burns wrote: Reminder to please test the installer. We already discovered a couple endian bugs on PPC, which is good, but we'd

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Christopher Burns
Great! I'm glad to see we have several PPC's in testing also. On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Christopher Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Burns wrote: Reminder to please test the installer. Dual G5 PPC mac, OS-X 10.4.11 python2.5 from python.org We already discovered a couple

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Christopher Burns
Hey Tommy, Does ActiveState install python in the same location as python.org? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:35:05 $ which python /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin/python On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Tommy Grav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Powerbook G4 with 10.5.2 and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Tommy Grav
Yes it does put python in that location as it should ;o) Cheers Tommy On May 20, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Christopher Burns wrote: Hey Tommy, Does ActiveState install python in the same location as python.org? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:35:05 $ which python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Christopher Burns
Good to know. Thanks! On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Tommy Grav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes it does put python in that location as it should ;o) Cheers Tommy On May 20, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Christopher Burns wrote: Hey Tommy, Does ActiveState install python in the same location as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-20 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Christopher Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've built a Mac binary for the 1.1 release candidate. Mac users, please test it from: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.1.0rc1-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg This is for the MacPython installed from python.org.

[Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Christopher Burns
I've built a Mac binary for the 1.1 release candidate. Mac users, please test it from: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.1.0rc1-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg This is for the MacPython installed from python.org. Thanks, Chris On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Tommy Grav
On May 19, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Christopher Burns wrote: I've built a Mac binary for the 1.1 release candidate. Mac users, please test it from: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.1.0rc1-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg This is for the MacPython installed from python.org. Thanks, Chris I tried

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Robert Kern
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Tommy Grav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: == FAIL: test_basic (numpy.core.tests.test_multiarray.TestView) -- Traceback (most recent

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Robert Kern
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Endianness issues. Probably bugs in the code. By which I meant test code. numpy itself is fine and is working correctly. The tests themselves incorrectly assume little-endianness. -- Robert Kern I have come to believe that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Robert Kern
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Endianness issues. Probably bugs in the code. By which I meant test code. numpy itself is fine and is working correctly. The tests themselves incorrectly

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Tommy Grav
On May 19, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Robert Kern wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Endianness issues. Probably bugs in the code. By which I meant test code. numpy itself is fine and is working correctly. The tests themselves incorrectly assume

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.1.0rc1 OSX Installer - please test

2008-05-19 Thread Christopher Burns
Thanks Tommy! Robert has already committed a fix. On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Tommy Grav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 19, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Robert Kern wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Endianness issues. Probably bugs in the code. By