On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
In a recent scipy pull request (https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/459),
I
ran into the problem of ufuncs automatically
On 20 Mar 2013 17:11, Warren Weckesser warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
In a recent scipy pull request
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
15.03.2013 22:39, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
[clip]
- Something else...
How about: scrap the automatic signatures altogether, and directly use
the docstring provided to the ufunc creation function?
I suspect ufuncs are not
Hi all,
In a recent scipy pull request (https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/459), I
ran into the problem of ufuncs automatically generating a signature in the
docstring using arguments such as 'x' or 'x1, x2'. scipy.special has a lot
of ufuncs, and for most of them, there are much more
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
In a recent scipy pull request (https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/459), I
ran into the problem of ufuncs automatically generating a signature in the
docstring using arguments such as 'x' or 'x1, x2'.
15.03.2013 22:39, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
[clip]
- Something else...
How about: scrap the automatic signatures altogether, and directly use
the docstring provided to the ufunc creation function?
I suspect ufuncs are not very widely used in 3rd party code, as it
requires somewhat tricky