23.02.2013 20:31, Sergio Callegari kirjoitti:
Partially fixed.
I was messing the row, column order. For some reason this was working in some
case. Now I've fixed it and it *always* works.
However, it is still slower than the cblas
cblas - 0.69 sec
scipy blas - 0.74 sec
The possible
Hi,
following the excellent advice of V. Armando Sole, I have finally succeeded in
calling the blas routines shipped with scipy from cython.
I am doing this to avoid shipping an extra blas library for some project of
mine that uses scipy but has some things coded in cython for extra speed.
So
... and it is not deterministic too...
About 1 time over 6 the code calling the scipy blas gives a completely wrong
result. How can this be?
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
Partially fixed.
I was messing the row, column order. For some reason this was working in some
case. Now I've fixed it and it *always* works.
However, it is still slower than the cblas
cblas - 0.69 sec
scipy blas - 0.74 sec
Any clue why?
___
