On Monday 27 August 2007 14:09:33 Christopher Barker wrote:
This is the best bet, or we could call the new one ma, and the old one
ma_old. In any case, the old one needs to stick around until the new one
has been fully tested for compatibility (and otherwise).
That shouldn't be a pb, the
Pierre GM wrote:
* Does anyone see any *disadvantages* to this aspect of maskedarray relative
to numpy.ma?
Nope, but I sure do see the advantages!
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/ORR(206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point
Matt Knox wrote:
- put it in numpy as a separate module from numpy.ma initially?
(eg. numpy.ma_new ?)
This is the best bet, or we could call the new one ma, and the old one
ma_old. In any case, the old one needs to stick around until the new one
has been fully tested for compatibility (and
Pierre GM wrote:
All,
* Does anyone see any *disadvantages* to this aspect of maskedarray relative
to numpy.ma?
* What would be the requisites to move maskedarray out of the sandbox ? We
hope to be able in the short term to either replace or at least merge the two
implementations,
On 8/24/07, Travis Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the direction of this work. For me, the biggest issue is whether
or not matplotlib (and other code depending on numpy.ma) works with it.
I'm pretty sure this can be handled and so, I'd personally like to see it.
mpl already supports
On Saturday 25 August 2007 12:50:38 Eric Firing wrote:
Alexander Michael wrote:
Is there any documentation available for your maskedarray?
Pierre wrote some notes about maskedarray here:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/MaskedArray
starting half-way down the page.
Please note
Pierre GM wrote:
On Saturday 25 August 2007 12:50:38 Eric Firing wrote:
Alexander Michael wrote:
Is there any documentation available for your maskedarray?
Pierre wrote some notes about maskedarray here:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/MaskedArray
starting half-way down the page.
I think it's reasonably safe to say at this point that most people are in
favor of the new maskedarray implementation becoming the default numpy.ma at
some point in the future. So the question is, when/how will the migration
process be done?
- just swap the whole thing as is and hope for the
On Saturday 25 August 2007 15:48:00 Eric Firing wrote:
I've made a couple of small emergency edits, but a separate page would
make things much more visible and less confusing.
So here it is:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/MaskedArrayAlternative
Please note the section : Optimizing
All,
As you might be aware, there are currently two concurrent implementations of
masked arrays in numpy:
* numpy.ma is the official implementation, but it is unclear whether it is
still actively maintained.
* maskedarray is the alternative I've been developing initially for my own
purpose
10 matches
Mail list logo
