On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
give our users
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Right, this part is specifically about ABI compatibility, not API
compatibility -- segfaults would only occur for extension libraries
that were compiled against one version of numpy and then used with a
different version.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Right, this part is specifically about ABI compatibility, not API
compatibility -- segfaults would only occur for extension libraries
that were
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
give our users what they want/need -- or even an appropriate way. So
we need to figure out
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
give our users
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what