On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 6/26/2012 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 6/26/2012 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a
Hi Fernando,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis CI?
Yes, we use both Shining Panda and Travis CI:
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis
On 6/26/2012 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a Raspberry PI no less)
WIndows XP 32 bit
SPARC (courtesy of our friends at NeuroDebian)
On 06/26/2012 06:15 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
My uninformed opinion from the sidelines: For me, this begged the
question of why projects would wait so long and be upgrading 1.5.x -
1.7.x. it sounded to me like an outreach problem.
lenny: none
squeeze: 1.4.1
wheezy: 1.6.2
hardy: 1.0.4
lucid:
Some examples would be nice. A lot of people did move already. And I haven't
seen reports of those that tried and got stuck. Also, Debian and Python(x,
y) have 1.6.2, EPD has 1.6.1.
In my company, the numpy for our production python install is well
behind 1.6. In the world of trading, the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
Some examples would be nice. A lot of people did move already. And I
haven't
seen reports of those that tried and got stuck. Also, Debian and
Python(x,
y) have 1.6.2, EPD has 1.6.1.
In my company, the numpy for our
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
because the original developers are gone. So people are loathe to
upgrade. It is certainly true that deprecations that have lived for a
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Peter Wang pw...@continuum.io wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
because the original developers are gone. So people are loathe to
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to get a
1.7 release out before SciPy. I would like to get a beta release out by SciPy
(or even an rc1 release). But, given the number of code changes and
differences between 1.5.x and 1.7, I think we will
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to
get a 1.7 release out before SciPy. I would like to get a beta release
out by SciPy (or even an rc1 release). But, given the
On Jun 26, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to get
a 1.7 release out before SciPy. I would like to get a beta release
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to
get
On 6/26/12 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Unfortunately, I think there are issues we are just now seeing with
code that was released in 1.6.x, and there are many people who have
not moved forward to 1.6.x yet.
Some examples would be nice.
I'll bite. Here's an issue that prevents
Unfortunately, I think there are issues we are just now seeing with code that
was released in 1.6.x, and there are many people who have not moved forward
to 1.6.x yet.
Some examples would be nice. A lot of people did move already. And I haven't
seen reports of those that tried
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Unfortunately, I think there are issues we are just now seeing with code
that was released in 1.6.x, and there are many people who have not moved
forward to 1.6.x yet.
Some examples would be nice. A lot of people
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array interface
regression as noted by Jason. Any other regressions from 1.5.x need to be
addressed as well. We'll have to decide on a case-by-case basis if
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array interface
regression as noted by Jason. Any other regressions from 1.5.x need to
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array interface
regression as noted by Jason. Any other regressions from 1.5.x need to
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis CI?
Yes, we use both Shining Panda and Travis CI:
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/ipython/
http://travis-ci.org/#!/ipython/ipython
The SP setup is more complete, including Mac
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis CI?
Yes, we use both Shining Panda and Travis CI:
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/ipython/
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a Raspberry PI no less)
WIndows XP 32 bit
SPARC (courtesy of our friends at NeuroDebian)
http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a Raspberry PI no less)
WIndows XP 32 bit
SPARC
25 matches
Mail list logo
