A Monday 28 February 2011 16:31:59 Ralf Gommers escrigué:
Proposed schedule:
March 15: beta 1
March 28: rc 1
April 17: rc 2 (if needed)
April 24: final release
Let me know what you think. Bonus points for volunteering to fix
some of those tickets:)
While doing tests on the new
A Sunday 06 March 2011 06:47:34 Mark Wiebe escrigué:
I think it's ok to revert this behavior for backwards compatibility,
but believe it's an inconsistent and unintuitive choice. In
broadcasting, there are two operations, growing a dimension 1 - n,
and appending a new 1 dimension to the left.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Francesc Alted fal...@pytables.org wrote:
A Monday 28 February 2011 16:31:59 Ralf Gommers escrigué:
Proposed schedule:
March 15: beta 1
March 28: rc 1
April 17: rc 2 (if needed)
April 24: final release
Let me know what you think. Bonus points
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:17:55 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
[clip]
from tables.utilsExtension import getPyTablesVersion, getHDF5Version
File definitions.pxd, line 138, in init tables.utilsExtension
(tables/utilsExtension.c:9238)
ValueError: numpy.dtype has the wrong size, try recompiling
A Monday 07 March 2011 14:49:26 Pauli Virtanen escrigué:
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:17:55 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
[clip]
from tables.utilsExtension import getPyTablesVersion,
getHDF5Version
File definitions.pxd, line 138, in init tables.utilsExtension
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:57:39 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
[clip]
However, the size of PyArray_Descr does not seem to have changed
between 1.5.1 and the Git master. So I'm not sure why you see this
error...
Maybe a Cython problem?
That would be seriously weird. Maybe the binaries you have
A Monday 07 March 2011 15:17:17 Pauli Virtanen escrigué:
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:57:39 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
[clip]
However, the size of PyArray_Descr does not seem to have changed
between 1.5.1 and the Git master. So I'm not sure why you see
this error...
Maybe a Cython
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:23:10 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
[clip]
ValueError: numpy.dtype has the wrong size, try recompiling
I don't think I'm wrong here, but I'd appreciate if somebody else can
reproduce this (either with tables or with another Cython-dependent
package).
Ok, seems this needs
A Monday 07 March 2011 15:39:38 Pauli Virtanen escrigué:
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:23:10 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
[clip]
ValueError: numpy.dtype has the wrong size, try recompiling
I don't think I'm wrong here, but I'd appreciate if somebody else
can reproduce this (either with tables
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
snip
A Saturday 05 March 2011 02:41:12 Charles R Harris escrigué:
There is a problem with code generated by Cython 0.13:
pytables-2.2.1 and pandas-0.3.0, which were built with Cython
0.13, report several failures and do crash during the tests. This
can probably be fixed by recythonizing with
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:58:14 -0600, Benjamin Root wrote:
I recently had to fix an example in matplotlib where there was a 1xN
array being assigned to a 1-D slice of a numpy array. It used to work,
but it now doesn't. I don't know if this was intended or not, though.
Probably not -- please
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Francesc Alted fal...@pytables.org wrote:
A Saturday 05 March 2011 02:41:12 Charles R Harris escrigué:
There is a problem with code generated by Cython 0.13:
pytables-2.2.1 and pandas-0.3.0, which were built with Cython
0.13, report several failures and
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:58:14 -0600, Benjamin Root wrote:
I recently had to fix an example in matplotlib where there was a 1xN
array being assigned to a 1-D slice of a numpy array. It used to work,
but it now doesn't. I
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:58:14 -0600, Benjamin Root wrote:
I recently had to fix an example in matplotlib where there was a 1xN
array being assigned to a
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
snip
I've had a look at the bug tracker, here's a list of tickets for 1.6:
#1748 (blocker: regression for astype('str'))
#1619 (issue with dtypes, with patch)
#1749 (distutils, py 3.2)
#1601 (distutils,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Before the first beta can be released I think #1748 should be fixed.
Before the first RC the
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:58:14 -0600, Benjamin Root wrote:
I recently had
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
This should be changed back so that the former works and the later does not.
It was intentional that the former worked --- it was consistent with
broadcasting rules.
A (1,20) array can be interpreted as a (20,) array.
Travis
(mobile phone of)
Travis Oliphant
Enthought, Inc.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Enthought oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
This should be changed back so that the former works and the later does
not. It was intentional that the former worked --- it was consistent with
broadcasting rules.
A (1,20) array can be interpreted as a (20,) array.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Enthought oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
This should be changed back so that the former works and the later does
not. It was intentional that the former worked --- it was
My point is also that we need to make sure the broadcasting rules are
consistent for both addition and array copy.
Addition would not create an error if a (1,20) array was added to a (20,)
array. Therefore, a (1,20) array can also copied into a (20,) array --- as
can a (1,1,1,1,20) array.
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
snip
I've had a look at the bug tracker, here's a list of tickets for 1.6:
#1748 (blocker: regression for astype('str'))
#1619 (issue with dtypes, with
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
My point is also that we need to make sure the broadcasting rules are
consistent for both addition and array copy.
Addition would not create an error if a (1,20) array was added to a (20,)
array. Therefore, a
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
My point is also that we need to make sure the broadcasting rules are
consistent for both addition and array copy.
Addition would
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
snip
I've had a look at the bug tracker, here's a list of tickets for 1.6:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southeybsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/28/2011 02:00 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Travis
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southeybsout...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 02/28/2011 02:00 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On 3/4/2011 11:54 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southeybsout...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:54:07AM -0800, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
I also ran tests and/or examples of a few 3rd party packages that were
built against numpy 1.5.1: scipy, pygame, PyMOL, numexpr, matplotlib,
basemap, scikits.learn, ETS.mayavi, Bottleneck, pytables, and pandas.
Wow, this is
Thanks (again) for taking this on Ralf. You are doing a superb job and deserve
much thanks for keeping the NumPy project on track.
I'm very encouraged by the NumPy 1.6 work. I was looking over the code some
more on the plane yesterday that Mark Wiebe has checked in (I finally was able
to
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.eduwrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Before the first beta can be released I think #1748 should be fixed.
Before the first RC the Solaris segfaults should be investigated, and
documentation for the new iterator
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
I tested the 32 and 64 bit msvc9/MKL builds for Python 2.7 and 3.2.
There are few test failures (listed below) that look familiar.
I also ran tests and/or examples of a few
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/28/2011 02:00 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Travis Oliphantoliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
The
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/28/2011 02:00 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Travis Oliphantoliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
The reason for a NumPy 1.6 suggestion, is that Mark (and others it would
seem) have
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great to do some 'housekeeping' and try to address some of
the old tickets dealt with before numpy 2.0. For example, I think
44 matches
Mail list logo
