On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
here's the rule for a set of arbitrary arrays (not necessarily just 2):
- if all the arrays are scalars, do type promotion on the types as is
- otherwise, do type promotion on min_scalar_type(a) of each array a
The
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
here's the rule for a set of arbitrary arrays (not necessarily just 2):
- if all the arrays are scalars, do type promotion on the types as is
-
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 23:43, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
It would be good to see a simple test case and understand why the boolean
multiplied by the scalar double is becoming a float16. In other
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:20, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 23:43, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Travis Oliphant
oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:20, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 23:43, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:20, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 23:43, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Travis Oliphant
oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:27, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, the behavior with respect to scalars sort of happened in the code on
the fly, so this is a good discussion to have. We should end up with
documented rules and tests to enforce them. I agree with Mark that
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:27, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, the behavior with respect to scalars sort of happened in the code
on
the fly, so this is a good discussion to have. We should
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:27, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, the behavior with respect to scalars sort
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:49, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
You're missing the key part of the rule that numpy uses: for
array*scalar cases, when both array and scalar are the same kind (both
floating point or
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 13:17, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:27, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, the behavior with respect to scalars sort of
All,
We noticed some failing tests for statsmodels between numpy 1.5.1 and
numpy = 1.6.0. These are the versions where I noticed the change. It
seems that when you divide a float array and multiply by a boolean
array the answers are different (unless the others are also off by
some floating
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 13:54, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
We noticed some failing tests for statsmodels between numpy 1.5.1 and
numpy = 1.6.0. These are the versions where I noticed the change. It
seems that when you divide a float array and multiply by a boolean
array
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.comwrote:
All,
We noticed some failing tests for statsmodels between numpy 1.5.1 and
numpy = 1.6.0. These are the versions where I noticed the change. It
seems that when you divide a float array and multiply by a boolean
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 13:54, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
We noticed some failing tests for statsmodels between numpy 1.5.1 and
numpy = 1.6.0. These are the versions where I noticed the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 13:54, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
We noticed some failing tests for statsmodels between numpy 1.5.1
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 13:54, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
We
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
snip
I agree with Charles. Let's take the needed time and work this through.
This is the sort of thing I was a bit nervous about with the changes made to
the
19 matches
Mail list logo
