On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it was removed right after the nose framework was working,
but I
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it was removed right after the nose framework was working,
but I think a decision was made to keep it around until 1.3 in case
somebody was using it, so I put it back. :) After the 1.2 release it
can just be
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it was removed right after the nose framework was working,
but I think a decision was made to keep it around until 1.3 in case
somebody
Hey all,
Now that we have switched to Nose as a test framework, we should look
into deprecating ParametricTestCase. Alan, have you looked into this
before?
Cheers
Stéfan
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that we have switched to Nose as a test framework, we should look
into deprecating ParametricTestCase. Alan, have you looked into this
before?
Actually, it was removed right after the nose framework was working,
