Hi,
Just to note, as they plan to remove there dependency on it this year,
is it bad that they can't use 1.8 for a few mounts until they finish
the conversion? They already have a working version. They can continue
to use it for as long they want. The only advantage for them if the
compat layers
I'm all for a big scary warning on import. Fair warning is good for
everyone, not just our developers.
As for testing, our software that uses the API is tested nightly. So if
our software stops working, and the compatibility layer is the cause, we
would definitely be looking into what happened.
based on our situation
On 10/01/2013 9:02 AM, Christopher Hanley wrote:
I'm all for a big scary warning on import. Fair
warning is good for everyone, not just our developers.
agree
As
After poking around our code base and talking to a few folks I predict that
we at STScI can remove our dependence on the numpy-numarray compatibility
layer by the end of this calendar year. I'm unsure of what the timeline
for numpy 1.8 is so I don't know if this schedule supports removal of the
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Christopher Hanley chan...@gmail.com wrote:
After poking around our code base and talking to a few folks I predict that
we at STScI can remove our dependence on the numpy-numarray compatibility
layer by the end of this calendar year. I'm unsure of what the
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Christopher Hanley chan...@gmail.comwrote:
After poking around our code base and talking to a few folks I predict
that we at STScI can remove our dependence on the numpy-numarray
compatibility layer by the end of this calendar year. I'm unsure of what
the
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Raul Cota r...@virtualmaterials.com wrote:
I realize we may be a minority but it would be very nice if support for
numeric could be kept for a few more versions. We don't have any particular
needs for numarray.
We just under went through an extremely long and
On 07/01/2013 9:22 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Raul Cota
r...@virtualmaterials.com
wrote:
I realize we may be a minority but it would be very
nice if support for
Ran a fair bit of our test suite using
numpy 1.7 compiling against the corresponding 'numpy/oldnumeric.h'
and everything worked well .
All I saw was the warning below which is obviously expected:
"""
Warning 23 warning Msg: Using deprecated NumPy
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Raul Cota r...@virtualmaterials.com wrote:
Ran a fair bit of our test suite using numpy 1.7 compiling against the
corresponding 'numpy/oldnumeric.h' and everything worked well .
All I saw was the warning below which is obviously expected:
Warning23
We can keep testing it in coming
versions while we catch up.
Raul Cota (P.Eng., Ph.D. Chemical Engineering)
Research Development Manager
Virtual Materials Group - Canada
www.virtualmaterials.com
===
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
To be clear, what you're talking about is basically deleting these two packages:
numpy.oldnumeric
numpy.numarray
plus the compatibility C API in
numpy/numarray/include
?
So this would only affect
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
To be clear, what you're talking about is basically deleting these two
packages:
numpy.oldnumeric
numpy.numarray
plus the
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
To be clear, what you're talking about is
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel
I realize we may be a minority but it
would be very nice if support for numeric could be kept for a few
more versions. We don't have any particular needs for numarray.
We just under went through an extremely long and painful process
to upgrade our software
17 matches
Mail list logo
