Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-25 Thread Bruce Southey
Robert Kern wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:58, Bruce Southey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October release so is there a policy on handling the migration

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-25 Thread Matthieu Brucher
As a footnote to this query, has the Scons community addressed the problem Scons had working with VS 2008 (=VS9)? No. I'm still facing the same issues, but I'll try to help David Cournapeau with his work on that (he is trying to simplify all Visual Studio supports). Matthieu -- French PhD

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Jon Wright
Travis E. Oliphant wrote: ... * Thus 1.2 will not break ABI compatibility but will add new API features. This is really great news (amongst the other good things). Many thanks for keeping the ABI compatible! All the best, Jon . ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Bruce Southey
Hi, I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October release so is there a policy on handling the migration to Python 3 or dual support of the 2 and 3 series? Thanks Bruce On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:39 PM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Alan G Isaac
Bruce Southey wrote: I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October release so is there a policy on handling the migration to Python 3 or dual support of the 2 and 3 series? As a footnote to this

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Robert Kern
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:58, Bruce Southey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October release so is there a policy on handling the migration to Python 3 or dual

[Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Travis E. Oliphant
Hi everybody, Robert K, Chuck H, Stefan VdW, Jarrod M, David C, and I had a nice discussion about the future directions of NumPy. We resolved some things and would like community feedback on them if there are opinions. * we will be moving to time-based releases (at least 2 times a year --

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
2008/8/23 Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]: By the way, as promised, the NumPy book is now available for download and the source to the book is checked in to the numpy SVN tree: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/numpy/doc/numpybook We just reorganised the docs somewhat, so this URL is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread James A. Benson
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: 2008/8/23 Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]: By the way, as promised, the NumPy book is now available for download and the source to the book is checked in to the numpy SVN tree: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/numpy/doc/numpybook We

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Keith Goodman
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, James A. Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: 2008/8/23 Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]: By the way, as promised, the NumPy book is now available for download and the source to the book is checked in to the